Archive for the ‘Life Extension’ Category

The number of total unemployment claims filed in the United Statesthroughout the now-months-longCOVID-19 recession just surpassed 44 million.

As restaurants and institutions were forced to shut down or drastically curtail their operations, and the financial repercussions spread to the rest of the economy, many Americans found themselves out of a job and struggling to pay for basic necessities such as rent and food. In April, Feeding America, a network of 200 food banks across the country, reported that demand across its affiliate food banks has increased on average by 40 percent.

And yet, at the same time, reports about mountains of surplus produce and thousands of acres of harvestable crops being plowed under appeared in the news. It was disturbing to see so much food go to waste at a time when the need for it was greatest. Why couldnt farmers simply redirect their surplus to the people who needed it?

The reason is that the food industry, with its complex network of sellers, buyers, processors and supply chains, was experiencing its own significant upheaval. In response, many organizations have worked hard over the past few months to bridge the gap between glut and scarcity. Many of these organizations are businesses or nonprofits that are part of the agricultural industry, while some had no experience with it before. They scrambled to form new partnerships, develop new sales channels and adopt new technologies, sometimes building entirely new supply chains up from scratch, all the while racing against the clock to save as many of the perishable goods that are the product of their industrys labor as possible.

MORE ON OPERATIONSTech Is Helping Restaurant Food Suppliers Deliver to Consumers

Food sometimes seems like the most boring of industries. You go into the grocery store and its always there, looking pretty much the same from week to week. There are red, yellow and green bell peppers. There are apples and tomatoes and garlic. Food begins to seem like any other mass-produced product, manufactured for our convenience off an endless assembly line somewhere.

But behind the scenes, there is a mad dash to get the food from farms, livestock producers and fisheries to consumers, with as little loss from damage or spoilage as possible. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, an estimated 30 to 40 percent of the total food produced in the U.S. is never consumed, which in 2010 equated to 133 billion pounds or $161 billion. And there are hints that even those numbers could be low, according to a study published last year by Santa Clara University that found a third of edible food grown on farms in California never even makes it off the field.

To prevent spoilage, according to Wired, three fourths of the food in an average meal is funneled through the food supply chain under refrigeration, which is necessary to prevent loss of food as its transported mostly from where its grown in California to where its consumed across the country. Also according to Wired, produce like tomatoes are optimized for how well they hold up in cold storage, rather than for taste.

Thirty to 40 percent of the total food produced in the U.S. is never consumed.

Even so, its a race against the clock. Food loss at a grocery store is a significant part of shrink a retail industry term for the percentage of items that are delivered for sale at a store that dont get sold. At a grocery store, the meat department has the highest level of shrink, followed by the produce department, whose shrink is on average 4.8 percent of sales within the department and contributes to 16 percent of total average store shrink.

Which is all to say that, when COVID-19 hit and restaurants, schools, and other institutions across the country closed down, many farmers suddenly found themselves with no place to send their food and a limited window of time before the crops that they spent months planting, growing and harvesting would all go to waste.

For farmers, the immediate thing that happened when all this shelter in place happened was overnight, all the restaurants, all the K-12 schools and institutions basically stopped ordering any food, said Joe Blunda. For fishers, for many farmers, up to 70 percent of their business evaporated overnight with no warning. Just literally flip a switch, its gone.

Blunda is CEO at Forager, a Maine-based company whose app connects local farms with large buyers, mostly grocery stores. Started in 2017, Forager helps small and local growers tap into larger markets such as grocers, schools and hospitals institutions that normally source food from large farms because it is easier to manage.

If youre a grocery store, for example, you buy a lot of food from what you call mainline or large distributors, who pack big trucks and drive this food from where it is mass-cultivated in warmer areas California, Florida, Mexico and others acrossthe country in cold trucks and deliver to grocers, Blunda said. Its very easy for grocers because distributors aggregate and organize a lot of products into one delivery, but the downside is it really cuts out the local farmer and the local fisher, particularly seafood as well.

According to Blunda, the amount of local food sold in grocery stores and restaurants to consumers is normally between 3 and 5 percent, and local growers often dont reach profitability without developing wholesale channels.

For fishers, for many farmers, up to 70 percent of their business evaporated overnight with no warning. Just literally flip a switch, its gone.

Even for grocery stores that would like to purchase more from local growers, it can be challenging to coordinate, because smaller farms lack the capital to invest in things like support software for logistics and supply chain management.

If youre a grocer and youre buying from a large distributor, youre able to leverage software, and its very efficient to generate orders and to integrate that ordering activity with some of the other systems in your business, Blunda said.

Working with small farms, on the other hand, can take significantly more time to coordinate manually using spreadsheets, emails and texts. And because smaller farms dont grow as much food as large farms, grocers have to work with more of them to get the same amount of inventory.

Forager founder David Stone told Food Industry Executive magazine in an interview that,if a grocer or restaurant wants to source from local food producers, they may have to work with 30, 40, or more independent suppliers.

The classic example we had early on when we started this company was one grocer with six locations and a warehouse, Stone said in an interview with Agriculture.com. On Sunday night, during the height of the season, he would receive 30 to 40 individual emails from farmers with their product lists in them, sometimes as many as 20 or 30 products with prices, and he would print them, put them out on the table, then input them into a Google Sheet and individually email each one of them back.

Foragers platform simplifies these interactions between sellers and buyers by bringing them into one app.

In March, when COVID-19 hit the U.S. hard, the company noticed that buyers on the platform increased the amount they were buying by 180 percent. The company realized that Forager could help with the food waste problem caused by COVID-19 as well. It applied for and received a grant from ReFED, an organization focused on reducing food waste in the U.S.

Local farms are always threatened with profitability risk. Every pound of food that they dont sell becomes a danger for them.

ReFEDs COVID-19 Food Waste Solutions Fund was created to quickly deliver vital funding to organizations that can rapidly scale food waste reduction and hunger relief efforts, according to its website. Angel Veza, who works on ReFEDs capital and innovation team, said the grants were focused on food loss on farms, logistics, distribution and last-mile delivery.

Forager applied for a grant from ReFED so that the company could scale up a pilot partnership program it started this year with a number of gleaning organizations. Gleaning organizations are groups that go to farms following a harvest and collect remaining food that is unharvested for whatever reason whether because an order fell through, or the farmer planted a surplus, or the food looks ugly or imperfect.

Most gleaning organizations are volunteer-based, and the food they glean is donated to food banks, but some organizations are experimenting with making gleaning profitable for farmers.

Local farms are always threatened with profitability risk, Blunda said. Every pound of food that they dont sell becomes a danger for them. So [gleaning organizations] are trying to help farms improve the profitability and sustainability of local food production.

In its pilot, Forager partnered with one gleaning organization to help it find customers for the excess food collected. With the ReFED grant, Forager plans to help farmers across 10 states sell a target of five million pounds of gleaned produce.

Blunda said the idea was to bring the gleaning process into the normal supply chain, and selling to the kinds of customers who can use it for food service deli and prepared food ingredients or even sell directly to consumers.

MORE ON OPERATIONSReal-Time Visibility Software Can Unclog Our Congested Supply Chains

Full Harvest, a San Francisco-based company, is built around a similar concept. The company provides an online marketplace that allows mostly large farms to sell surplus and imperfect produce to food manufacturing companies, which includes customers such as soup companies, press juiceries, baby food and pet food companies across the country.

In May, when Built In spoke to Keely Wachs, head of marketing at Full Harvest, he said the company was trying to connect farmers who had large amounts of surplus due to COVID-19 food service industry closures to food manufacturing companies that make consumer packaged goods.

Weve had some success there, Wachs said. But the truth is that the demand for consumer packaged goods and retail hasnt gone up commensurate with the drop in food service.

Full Harvest has also been starting to connect with organizations such as food banks.

One of the big things weve been trying to figure out is how to get the nonprofit agency types of buyers onto the marketplace, because its kind of a different thing, Wachs said.

But he said that even if farmers with surpluses are able to connect with food banks, there is still an underlying issue. Simply locating surplus crops isnt enough farmers have acres upon acres of produce, which requires significant labor to harvest, package and transport.

The biggest problem is, who pays for it? Wachs said. Typically food banks and those organizations work on donations. The farmers arent going to harvest if theyre not going to get paid some of them will do some donations, but by and large farmers work on very thin margins. So the idea of just going out and harvesting without getting paid is not something that they can do, even if they want to.

Not all of the organizations working to help bridge this gap have worked in the agricultural industry before. One of them, a nonprofit named FarmLink that was founded in March, is run by a group of student volunteers. FarmLink uses donations to pay farmers for their surplus produce and to pay truckers shipping the food to food banks. In May, the nonprofit also received a grant from ReFED to help fund its operations.

We want to kind of slip into the supply chain where its broken, said Jordan Hartzell, a junior at Brown University living in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, who works on logistics at FarmLink. The nonprofit operates by cold calling farmers to ask about whether they have surplus food and, if so, negotiating a price to buy the surplus from them using the donations FarmLink has raised. The volunteers then find local food banks and ask how much produce they need and are able to take, and finally arrange for the transportation of the food.

One thing that weve really noticed is how difficult it is to connect and reach out to farmers in a scalable way, said Andrew Hojel, a Stanford University student living in Austin, Texas, who helps lead the nonprofits development team. Thats probably one of our biggest bottlenecks, actually getting the farmers to interact with our website, actually just reaching out to the farmers.

A lot of reaching out to farms, finding food banks, and actually engaging with them and figuring out if they need our help, or how we can help, just is very manual.

We were lucky to have a student join us whos really interested in writing scripts to scrape websites, Hartzell said. He did that and found about 1,500 farms and was able to compile a list. That is kind of a new way that we found to research farms, just by scraping a bunch of web pages to find farm names, and contact info, and a gauge of how big the farm is and what produce they have.

But even with a dedicated development team, the nonprofit has found that the work of helping connect farms to food banks still requires a lot of elbow grease.

What weve seen with a lot of these processes is that they really cant be automated easily, Hojel said. Early on we thought that we could drive traffic to our website, with farmers saying, Weve had this surplus, but it definitely is not a simple thing....A lot of reaching out to farms, finding food banks, and actually engaging with them and figuring out if they need our help, or how we can help, just is very manual.

Angel Veza from ReFED echoed this sentiment.

I dont ever think technology is a silver bullet, she said. But I think there are a lot of ways it can help reduce food waste.

Veza said that COVID-19 has highlighted the fragility of our food system, specifically that there can be a breakdown of labor and logistics. While she doesnt believe technology can necessarily fix these problems, she listed a few areas of innovation that could help with efforts to build solutions.

There were some trends pre-coronavirus that may be accelerated and involves technology, like farm sensor technologies to monitor key variables like weather and photosynthesis, drone technology that can help farmers monitor and analyze, and targeted use of nutrients and water use and shelf-life extension I think that theres some opportunities there moving forward beyond just this B2B, B2C technology.

I dont ever think technology is a silver bullet, but I think there are a lot of ways it can help reduce food waste.

For its part, FarmLink is working on ways to build up a volunteer network that can become self-sustaining. The development team is creating an app that engages [volunteers] in the work of FarmLink, and supports them with tasks such as lead generation and making calls to farms and food banks.

Were really looking into ways where we can reduce this manual labor and time-intensive tasks, but at this point we really havent found anything, Hojel said. So now were moving more toward taking advantage of the fact that there are so many people interested in helping with the food waste situation and actually getting action and work from them to help their own communities.

Its not hard to see why this is FarmLinks long-term strategy. The nonprofits current crop of student volunteers feel a passion for the work and its goals despite not knowing much about the industry a few months ago.

Its been really wonderful to meet all of these students who are passionate about the same things, Hartzell said. A lot of us have this running joke that well jump out of class to catch a meeting for FarmLink if we need to.

I had no idea how much food waste was generated, she said. I think if you told me to list a few of the steps in the industrial farming supply chain a month ago, I wouldnt have been able to. Just realizing what I dont know was important for me in this project.

MORE ON AG-TECHThe Robot Revolution (of Crop Picking) Is Here

Read more:
How Agtech Is Limiting Food Waste Amid the Coronavirus Pandemic - Built In

The modern baking and snack consumer wants packaging that keeps products fresh and tasty as long as possible and offers easy-to-eat, single-serve portions for their on-the-go lifestyle. These consumer demands are driving packaging designers to look toward flexible packaging options.

Flexible packaging now accounts for close to 40% of global packages, according to the Flexible Packaging Assessment Report from PMMI Business Intelligence, part of PMMI. Within flexible packaging, food remains the largest industry by end-use, with biscuits/snack bars and sweet and savory snacks combining to represent the largest growth segment among areas exceeding industry growth rates. This aligns with consumers increasing awareness of the health benefits of snacks such as nuts, dried fruits and nutritional bars.

Per PMMIs report, snack food packaging designs that require smaller pouches for nuts and dried fruit, nutrition bars and even mix-in protein powders facilitate the healthy eating trend and stand to support growth through 2022. CPG companies recognize that food, in general, is experiencing a higher increase in production and sales using flexible packaging, and is moving many in the snack food sector to embrace this format. The industry is now gearing toward on-the-go packaging, user convenience, smaller pack sizes and easy-to-open features. One example cited in the study notes a baking syrup manufacturing company transitioning its products from a can with a pump to a pouch with a dispenser, stating the pouch version is more cost-efficient and easier to make.

While flexible packaging is more sustainable and uses less energy to make, these desirable qualities for CPGs and consumers become a design challenge when looking at end-of-life recycling. There is currently a lack of recycling options for multi-material laminated films, such as snack bags and foil pouches, which are difficult to separate into their various material substrates.

Although many packaging material companies worldwide are scrambling to develop sustainable packaging materials to reduce environmental impact, it is a time-consuming and expensive process. CPGs need to build flexibility into their supply chain as obtaining environmentally friendly materials is not as easy as acquiring more traditional packaging materials. The industry is responding to these supply chain challenges with new initiatives to improve the sustainability profile of flexible packaging. These actions include developing new technologies, such as flexible packaging sortation to drive recycling and collection and auto-sortation of flexible materials. Several manufacturers are continuing to identify techniques to make the collection and sortation of flexible packaging waste feasible and economically friendly. Others continue to investigate new materials for flexible packaging, including compostable or bio-based structures.

According to the report, baked foods are increasing the use of bags and pouches because of the lower cost, shelf-life extension and product visibility. Adding modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) can extend shelf life even more, especially when baked foods include fruits and vegetables as ingredients. Coupling the advances of MAP and high-performance films give CPGs products with excellent mechanical strength and chemical resistance against bacteria growth.

As the industry continues to navigate through the challenges posed by the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the resulting impact onflexible packaging manufacturers, suppliers can visitPMMI's COVID-19 resource pagefor helpful insights on ways to adapt and evolve in a new normal. For further support in overcoming operational challenges and uncovering helpful solutions, Pack Expo International and Healthcare Packaging Expo, set for November 2020,will serve as North America's resource for packaging technologies across a wide range of industries.

See the original post:
The importance of flexible packaging in the snack category - Baking Business

Researchstore.biz has delivered an analysis look at Global Lingonberry Extract Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025 collectively with exchange methods, development charge, evolving know-how, business enterprise rivals, key businesses and forecast to 2025. The report studies the data of revenue, production, and manufacturers of each region. Region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period have also been analyzed. The report offers a close approach towards important developments which is probably expected to have a giant and effect on the progress of the change in the forecast duration from 2020 to 2025. Then, the research report on the global Lingonberry Extract market highlights insightful data about revenue, growth rates, sales, market share for timeframe between 2020 to 2025, and price trends.

NOTE: Our analysts monitoring the situation across the globe explains that the market will generate remunerative prospects for producers post COVID-19 crisis. The report aims to provide an additional illustration of the latest scenario, economic slowdown, and COVID-19 impact on the overall industry.

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.researchstore.biz/sample-request/38740

Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape analysis as well as market growth trends are explained in detail. Competition matrix benchmarks main players based on their capabilities and boom potential. An in-depth analysis of revenue share, market size, price and gross margin for each industry vendor is offered in this research report. Factors inclusive of market position, offerings, and focus on R&D contribute to an organizations abilities. According to the report, top-line boom, marketplace share, segment boom, and future outlook contribute to an organizations boom potential. This segment additionally identifies and includes numerous latest traits witnessed by using leading players operating in the international Lingonberry Extract market.

Key companies profiled in this report are: Shanghai Freemen , Dongling Health Food , Swanson , Natrol , Bio Botanica , Source Naturals , Athelas Nutraceuticals , Life Extension

With respect to the product bifurcation, the market is segregated into: Powder, Granular

With respect to the application segment bifurcation, the market is segregated into: Food Industry, Pharmaceuticals Industry, Other

Moreover, the report presents an investigation of the global Lingonberry Extract market chain structure, downstream buyers, market positioning, upstream raw material data. The analysis has mentioned the volume of production by region, pricing analysis according to each type, manufacturer, region, and the global price has been given further.

Regional Outlook:

As part of the geographic evaluation of the international Lingonberry Extract industry, this research digs deep into the boom of key regions and countries, consisting of North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy), Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia), South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia), Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa). All of the geographies are comprehensively studied on the premise of share, intake, manufacturing, future growth potential, CAGR, and plenty of other parameters.

ACCESS FULL REPORT: https://www.researchstore.biz/report/global-lingonberry-extract-market-38740

There Are 12 Chapters To Deeply Display The Lingonberry Extract Market.

Chapter 1, it determines global Lingonberry Extract market introduction, research objectives, and market research methodology

Chapter 2, is an executive summary of Market, exposes assessment of types, and shows an assessment of applications

Chapter 3, Market analysis by players, competition landscape analysis with market size, share, and the concentration ratio

Chapter 4, to reveal the evaluation of regions and courtiers (or sub-regions)

Chapter 5, North America market size by countries, by type, by application

Chapter 6, Europe market size by countries, by type, by application

Chapter 7, Asia-Pacific market size by countries, by type, by application

Chapter 8, South America market size by countries, by type, by application

Chapter 9, Middle East and Africa market size by countries, by type, by application

Chapter 10, to forecast the market in the subsequent years by type, by application

Chapter 11, key players analysis with company details, the product offered, revenue, gross margin and market share

Chapter 12, Research findings and conclusion

Customization of the Report:This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team ([emailprotected]), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +1-201-465-4211 to share your research requirements.

About Us

Researchstore.biz is a fully dedicated global market research agency providing thorough quantitative and qualitative analysis of extensive market research.Our corporate is identified by recognition and enthusiasm for what it offers, which unites its staff across the world.We are desired market researchers proving a reliable source of extensive market analysis on which readers can rely on. Our research team consist of some of the best market researchers, sector and analysis executives in the nation, because of which Researchstore.biz is considered as one of the most vigorous market research enterprises. Researchstore.biz finds perfect solutions according to the requirements of research with considerations of content and methods. Unique and out of the box technologies, techniques and solutions are implemented all through the research reports.

Contact UsMark StoneHead of Business DevelopmentPhone: +1-201-465-4211Email: [emailprotected]Web: http://www.researchstore.biz

Click Here For Similar Reports:

Global Touch Screen Tea Table Market 2020 Key Players, Comprehensive Research, SWOT Analysis and Forecast by 2025

Global Class Card Machine Market 2020 Key Players, Comprehensive Research, SWOT Analysis and Forecast by 2025

Global Oxfendazole Market 2020 Key Players, Comprehensive Research, SWOT Analysis and Forecast by 2025

Global Toldimphos Sodium Market 2020 Key Players, Comprehensive Research, SWOT Analysis and Forecast by 2025

Go here to read the rest:
Global Lingonberry Extract Market 2020 In-depth Analysis, Significant Trends and Forecast With COVID-19 Update - 3rd Watch News

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla., June 10, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --When it comes to choosing the right vitamin, 74 percent of Americans are concerned that the advertised or promised benefits of vitamins and supplements are not backed by trustworthy research. As Americans begin to focus more on overall health and wellness, Life Extension, the health solutions expert translating scientific research for over 40 years into premium, clinically studied vitamins and supplements, wants to help consumers take away the guesswork when selecting the right vitamins and supplements to maintain their whole health, self-care.

To highlight the importance of choosing the best options, a new survey conducted by Life Extension revealed there is a clear crisis in confidence with Americans when it comes to their vitamin and supplement options. While nearly all supplement users (92 percent) believe that ingredients are important when purchasing a vitamin, two-fifths (42 percent) do not research the ingredients when considering which product to choose.

"Better health and quality of life are the biggest motivators when taking vitamins and supplements, but unfortunately, many people don't know where to start and how to find a trusted resource," said Michael Smith, MD and Life Extension Education Director. "That's why at Life Extension we make it easy to find high quality, research-backed vitamins and supplements. We offer free Wellness Specialists to answer questions prior to taking a vitamin or supplement and laboratory panel testing to help personalize supplement choices."

Additional survey highlights include:

The survey found that while Americans want their vitamins to work, they are not putting in the work to find the right ones for them. Roughly three-quarters of supplement users do not research factors that determine or contribute to the overall effectiveness of the products they are spending their money on, such as third-party testing (75 percent), industry certifications (73 percent) or where the product is made (72 percent). Life Extension researches, test and retest every ingredient in all of their products, and pride themselves on their quality clinical research to substantiate ingredient benefits and the efficacy of their formulations. Constant scrutiny of published scientific findings is used to establish optimal dosages for maximum benefit.

Find out more about the Vitamin and Supplement Buyer Confidence and Knowledge Survey

Survey Methodology

These highlights present the findings of an online survey conducted among a nationally representative sample of 1,500 Americans 18 years of age and older, who live in the United States and take a vitamin or supplement at least 2-3 times a week. The total sample data is nationally representative based on age, gender, ethnicity, region, household income and educational attainment. The online survey was conducted by Lucid and completed between January 28th and February 4th, 2020. The margin of error for the total sample at the 95% confidence level is +/- 2.53 percentage points.

About Life Extension

Life Extension is the health solutions expert that is translating scientific research into everyday insights for people wanting to live their healthiest lives. For nearly 40 years, Life Extension has pursued innovative advances in health, conducting rigorous clinical trials and setting some of the most demanding standards in the industry to offer a full range of quality nutritional vitamins and supplements and blood-testing services. Life Extension's Wellness Specialists provide personalized counsel to help customers choose the right products for optimal health, nutrition and personal care. To learn more, visit LifeExtension.com.

SOURCE Life Extension

https://www.lifeextension.com

See original here:
New Survey Reveals 74 Percent of Americans are Concerned that Vitamins and Supplements are not Backed by Trustworthy Research - PRNewswire

(WZAW) -- The disruption to everyday life has impacted our mental and physical health. Focusing on ones health is more important than ever, and now is the right time to evaluate and improve your diet and learn more about what vitamins and supplements are needed and where to get them.

A new survey conducted by Life Extension reveals 39% of American supplement takers are motivated to take vitamins because they believe their diet is lacking and vitamins and/or supplements help them make up for it, but while nearly 92% of the users believe the ingredients are important when purchasing, 42% dont research the ingredients when considering which product to choose. Additionally, many respondents 74% are concerned the benefits of supplements are not backed by trustworthy research.

On Tuesday, registered dietitian Maya Feller joined NewsChannel 7 at 4 to share tips to help Americans live their healthiest lives, including supplement recommendations for specific deficiencies.

The best ways to get your nutrients from food is to really look to foods that are in whole or minimally processed form. So, things like fruits, vegetables, whole grains, with limited added sugars, salt and synthetic fat, Feller explained. Its going to give your body a plethora of access to vitamins and minerals.

If you arent eating those foods, Feller said its important to fill those nutrient gaps. Thats when you can introduce supplements.

When were thinking about supplementation, safe supplementation is key.

She said people can learn if a nutrient or supplement is right for them by is to get a lab test done.

They can go to lifeextension.com and request a lab panel right there. They can then take that result back to a Life Extension wellness expert, or they can take it to their primary care provider or dietician, Feller explained. That way the supplementation can really be individualized, so that people are taking the correct dosage at the right frequency in intervals over the right period of time.

See original here:
Maintaining health and nutrition while staying at home - WSAW

A B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, 2013. Photo credit: Tech. Sgt. Shane A. Cuomo for US Defense Department.

As the novel coronavirus pandemic continues to exact a terrible human and economic toll on the United States, Americans are adjusting how they view national security. There also appears to be agreement, even within the senior leadership of the Defense Department, that the military budget, which has seen significant growth during the Trump administration, is likely to be pared back in the coming years as federal deficits soar.

So it should be no surprise that the havoc wrought by the virus has also fanned the flames of an ongoing debate about the Trump administrations aggressive and costly plans to sustain and upgrade the US nuclear arsenal.

But some supporters of the status quo will not countenance any challenge to business as usual. In an April 17 conversation hosted by the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, Frank Miller, a distinguished former US government official, argued that it is illegitimate and irresponsible to cite the current public health and economic crisis as a rationale to rethink US nuclear weapons spending priorities. A close examination reveals, however, that his reasoning is deeply flawed.

The unsustainable nuclear budget. At the Arms Control Association, where I am the director for disarmament and threat reduction policy, we have long argued that the administrations approach is unnecessary, unsustainable, and unsafe. The financial and opportunity costs have steadily grown and the biggest nuclear weapons modernization bills are just beginning to arrive. Government officials in charge of the nuclear weapons enterprise warn about the pervasive and overwhelming risk facing the current nuclear modernization program.

The danger posed by the plans is on full display in the administrations fiscal year 2021 budget request.

The Defense and Energy Departments are requesting$44.5 billion for next year to sustain and modernize US nuclear delivery systems and warheads and their supporting infrastructure, a larger-than-anticipated increase of about $7.3 billion, or 19 percent, from the fiscal year 2020 level. Meanwhile, the administration is recommending a lower overall national defense budget than Congress provided last year.

The combination of a decreased topline budget but an increased nuclear budget means that other defense programs would have to be cut. Some programs on the chopping block include the Navys planned second Virginia class submarine, the Energy Departments efforts to clean up nuclear waste leftover from US nuclear weapons production during the Cold War, and the Pentagons Cooperative Threat Reduction program, which supports global efforts to detect and secure dangerous pathogens such as the coronavirus.

And this was all before the coronavirus began its deadly march across the country and before Congress spent several trillion dollars trying to save the US economy from complete collapse.

Although Pentagon officials insist that nuclear weapons should be shielded from possible future defense budget cuts, the pressure on the federal budget imposed by the response to the virus is likely to exacerbate the affordability and execution challenges confronting the administrations nuclear spending plans. If great power competition with China is the Pentagons top priority, is it prudent to sacrifice a Virginia class submarine every year for the next 10 to 15 years to attempt to keep an excessive and overburdened nuclear modernization effort on track? The answer should be no, especially in light of the quantitative and qualitative superiority of the US nuclear arsenal over Chinas.

In the view of many, the Trump administrations proposal to expand spending on nuclear weapons is a sad and dangerous illustration of wildly misplaced federal spending priorities. As it proposed a 19 percent increase for nuclear weapons next year, the White House initially planned to slash the budgets for the Centers for Disease Control by 19 percent and the National Institutes of Health by 7 percent. The Pentagons proposal to cut the budget for the Cooperative Threat Reduction program in order to fund weapons modernization amid a global pandemic is shockingly reckless.

How can we prepare and arm ourselves so completely for wars that may never come, wrote Tyler Rogoway, editor of The Drive, in March, but we are so ill-prepared for one that we knew was more likely around the corner than not?

Inexplicably, the unprecedented economic crisis facing the nation hasnt stopped some Trump administration officials from raising the prospect of even greater spending on nuclear weapons above and beyond what is already planned. Marshall Billingslea, President Trumps special envoy for arms control, said recently that if Russia and China dont agree to US demands for talks on new trilateral arms control to replace the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), Washington could win a new arms race if necessary. We know how to win these races, and we know how to spend the adversary into oblivion, he said.

More US spending on nuclear weapons wont force the current Russian and Chinese leadership to capitulate and would be fraught with peril. The administrations desire to pursue a more ambitious arms control agreement is the right goal, but it cant be achieved before New START is slated to expire next February. A new quantitative arms race that could follow the collapse of New START would further undermine stability between the United States and Russia, the health of the global nonproliferation regime, and the US militarys emphasis on competition with China.

Our new post-pandemic reality should make it all the more obvious that the current modernization plans need to be reconsidered in a way that eliminates the most excessive and destabilizing elements, saves taxpayer dollars for other pressing national and health security needs, and is in sync with a revitalized and realistic strategy to cap and reduce global nuclear stockpiles.

A debate on nuclear weapons policy. In an article published on the Arms Control Association website in March, Shannon Bugos and I criticized the 2021 budget request for nuclear weapons and made the case for a different approach. The critique apparently struck a nerve with supporters of the Trump plans.

In his remarks for the Mitchell Institute event, Miller alleged that our organization is part of a nefarious disarmament cabal and attempted a point-by-point rebuttal of the purported body of lies and dangerous recommendations contained in our article. He claimed that our critique comes from a group of people who have never felt the burden of public responsibility and public office in defense of this nation and our allies. (In reality, nearly half of the Arms Control Associations 17-member board of directors has served in government in some capacity, including several board members who have served at the Defense Department.)

Miller published an expanded version of his remarks earlier this month in Real Clear Defense.

But a review of what we actually wrote reveals that Miller either did not read our article or deliberately chose to distort its contents. Below I respond to each of his assertions.

The growing costs. Millers claim: The projected cost of the [nuclear] modernization program as a percentage of the defense budget is not growing.

Response: The projected cost of nuclear weapons, both in actual dollars and as a percentage of the national defense budget, is clearly growing, and doing so more quickly than anticipated.

The Pentagon request for 2021 of $28.9 billion to sustain and modernize the triad of nuclear delivery systems and supporting command and control infrastructure is a large increase above this years appropriated level of $24.8 billion. As we noted, the requested amounts are consistent with the projected spending levels for these programs contained in previous budget submissions.

The request for the semiautonomous National Nuclear Security Administration nuclear weapons program, however, is far larger than anticipated. The submission calls for $15.6 billion, an astonishing increase of $3.1 billion, or 25 percent, above the fiscal 2020 appropriation, and $2.8 billion more than the projection for 2021 contained in the fiscal year 2020 budget request. Over the next five years, the National Nuclear Security Administration is planning to request over $81 billion for weapons activities, a nearly 24 percent increase over what it planned to seek over the same period as of last year.

Miller, echoing arguments often made by Pentagon officials, claims that even at its projected peak in 2029, spending on nuclear weapons will consume no more than 6 to 7 percent of total Pentagon spending. But this is misleading, unless you think a credible deterrent can be maintained without having actual warheads.

The 6 to 7 percent figure doesnt include spending at the National Nuclear Security Administration. When that is included, nuclear weapons already account for 6 percent of the total 2021 national defense budget request and will rise to 7 percent by 2024. Given the rate at which that agencys budget is exploding, probable future cost overruns in the delivery system modernization programs, and the likelihood of flat overall defense budgets (at best) for the foreseeable future, it is conceivable that spending on nuclear weapons could approach 10 percent of national defense spending by the late 2020s.

Miller can claim that the growing modernization bill is worth the price. But he cant claim that the price tag isnt growing.

A bigger stockpile. Millers claim: You can search the 2018 [Nuclear Posture Review] from cover to cover without finding any policy which supports expanding the US nuclear warhead stockpile.

Response: It is true that the Trump administration is not currently planning to grow the size of the arsenal. But we never claimed otherwise. Instead, the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review contains several proposed initiatives that support preparing the United States to grow the size of the stockpile in the event of a future decision to do so. Examples include: providing the enduring capability and capacity to produce plutonium pits at a rate of no fewer than 80 pits per year by 2030; exploring approaches for rapid [warhead] prototyping; assessing the potential for retired warheads and components to augment the future hedge stockpile; and reducing the time required to design, develop, and initially produce a warhead, from a decision to enter full-scale development.

According to Madelyn Creedon, former deputy administrator at the National Nuclear Security Administration during the Obama administration, the Nuclear Posture Review lays out a long-term plan to prepare the United States to develop, test, and deploy new nuclear weapons and to increase the size of the nuclear stockpile. In short, prepare for a new arms race.

The National Nuclear Security Administrations needs. Millers claim: There should be no cause for uncertainty about the crying need for increased funding for [the National Nuclear Security Administration].

Response: For 2021, the National Nuclear Security Administration has requested a large unplanned increase, totaling $15.6 billion for weapons activities. To many, such an increase was surprising: The agencysaidonly last year that its 2020 budget plan was fully consistent with the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review and affordable and executable. Under that proposal, the agency did not plan to request more than $15 billion for weapons activities until 2030!

So, what changed? Lisa Gordon Hagerty, head of the National Nuclear Security Administration, was asked to explain the rationale for such a large unplanned increase at a Congressional hearing in March, but her attempt at an answer hardly cleared up the situation. Perhaps there is a clearer explanation for why the agency so badly misjudged its funding needs for 2021, but if so the agency has yet to provide it.

Plutonium pit production. Millers claim: The comment that building 80 pits per year is unprecedented just doesnt even work within their own circles.

Response: At no point did we claim that the National Nuclear Security Administrations effort to build at least 80 pits per year is unprecedented. What we actually wrote, citing an Institute for Defense Analyses report published last year, is that there is no historical precedent for the agencys plan to go from the current production level of zero pits per year to 80 pits per year by 2030. The Institute for Defense Analyses report could not be clearer: No available option can be expected to provide 80 pits per year by 2030.

The right size for the arsenal. Millers claim: Its also absurd in the extreme to argue that the size of the current arsenal is more than is required for deterrence.

Response: Its not at all absurd to argue that the size of the current US nuclear arsenal is more than is required for deterrence of adversaries and assurance of allies.

In 2013, the Obama administration determined that deterrence requirements could be met with one-third fewer deployed New START-accountable strategic nuclear forces. Yet Obama did not immediately reduce the size of Americas nuclear force, despiteconcludingthat deterrence could be achieved by even a unilateral reduction.

Miller is of course free to argue that further reductions in the arsenal should only occur bilaterally with Russia (or trilaterally with Russia and China) or that the current security environment is such that further reductions arent advisable. But in that case the burden of proof is on him to explain the logic that presumes Moscow and Beijing would not be deterred by 1,000 nuclear warheads deployed on hundreds of delivery systems but are deterred by the 1,550 warheads deployed today.

The burden is also on him to explain why the current modernization plans should be funded next year at the expense of the Navys conventional shipbuilding account, defense environmental cleanup, and the Cooperative Threat Reduction programand likely at the expense of similar such cuts in future years. A Virginia class submarine would seem to be far more relevant to great power competition with China than a one-year increase in funds for an agency that said last year it didnt need those funds and is unlikely to be able to spend them.

Nuclear war fighting. Millers claim: There is that old canard, the ever-popular bloody flag that US policy is based on nuclear war fighting, not on deterrence.

Response: In our article and elsewhere we advocate for a nuclear strategy that deemphasizes nuclear war fighting by opposing the Trump administrations proposal to double the number of low-yield nuclear options in the US nuclear arsenal. Miller and other supporters of expanding the number of such options claim that doing so would strengthen deterrence and raise the nuclear threshold.

But the purported deterrent value of additional low-yield options is premised on the concern that adversaries might think the United States would be self-deterred from a more difficult to use higher-yield response. Indeed, Pentagon officials repeatedly argue that policy makers cannot simply assume that a possible nuclear conflict will inevitably escalate to massive nuclear use. They assert that the United States must plan and prepare to be able to prevail in a limited nuclear conflict.

While we do not advocate for the elimination of low-yield weapons from the US nuclear arsenal, we reject the notion that heightening their role is necessary or stabilizing. Placing greater emphasis on low-yield options risks spawning more planning for their use and belief, including by our adversaries, that such use can be controlled, thereby risking a lowering of the threshold for nuclear use.

The future nuclear submarine fleet. Millers claim: The idea that the size of the Columbia class should be cut, betrays either complete dishonesty, and theres a lot of that in their pitch, or total ignorance of industrial reality. Cutting boats 11 and 12 and possibly 13 and 14 wont solve the fiscal problem the [Arms Control Association] has raised with regard to coronavirus.

Response: At no point have we ever claimed that eliminating two to four submarines from the planned Columbia class purchase would solve the fiscal challenges facing the Pentagon. In fact, we clearly stated in our article that pressure on the defense budget cannot be relieved solely by reducing nuclear weapons spending.

What we argue is that changes to the nuclear replacement effort, including the Columbia class program, could make the effort easier to execute and ease some of the hard choices facing the overall defense enterprise, choices that are likely to get even harder amid constrained defense budgets. According to the Congressional Budget Office, eliminating two to four boats at the back end of the planned 12-boat Columbia class purchase would save during the 2030s between $17 and $36 billion in fiscal year 2017 dollars. Buying two additional boats as suggested by Miller would cost an additional $16 billion.

Land-based forces. Millers claim: The idea of extending the Minuteman [III] force has been studied and studied and studied. You just cant do this safely.

Response: We disagree that it is not possible to further extend the life of the Minuteman III, as explained in detail in an article in War on the Rocks. A 2014 Air Force study and a 2014 RAND Corporation study both concluded that extending the life of the Minuteman III would be possible. The latter suggested that delaying the development of a new missile by 20 years could save nearly $40 billion dollars through the mid-2030s.

Air-launched cruise missiles. Millers claim: The absurd notion that nuclear tipped cruise missiles are uniquely destabilizing is a notion unique to American disarmers. Abandoning the [Long Range Stand Off weapon] will also condemn the B-21 to fly directly into advanced enemy defenses in the decades to come.

Response: We also disagree with Miller about the case for building a new fleet of nuclear air-launched cruise missiles via the Long Range Stand Off program.

Concerns about the escalation risks associated with weapons systems that have both conventional and nuclear variants is hardly a concern unique to American disarmers. As Gen. Curtis M. Scaparrotti, former commander of US European Command, warned in 2017: One of the things that you see that is disturbing is the fact that [the Russians] are using similar weapon systems that can either be conventional or nuclear, which then makes it difficult for us to clearly understand what they have employed.

Miller worries that attempting to drop a nuclear gravity bomb (the B61-12) over a heavily defended target is too risky and might not succeed. But if the Air Force believes the stealth capabilities of the B-21 (which is still under development) could be compromised soon after it is deployed, then it is reasonable to question the services strategy for buying the bomber and retaining nuclear gravity bombs in the first place. For its part, US Strategic Command does not appear concerned about the long-term survivability of the B-21. As Gen. Hyten told Congress in July 2017, Its not the survivability of the bombers, its the ability of the bombers to access targets. By this Hyten meant that while bombers armed with nuclear gravity bombs can only attack one target at a time, the Long Range Stand Off weapon provides each bomber the ability to attack multiple targets at one time.

It is not surprising that military planners would want many different ways of attacking a target. But the weapons associated with the other two legs of the nuclear triadthe sea- and land-based forcescan also penetrate air defenses and strike targets anywhere on the planet with high confidence.

New warheads. Millers claim: Calling for a halt to upgraded US ballistic missile warheads and abandoning the ability to build new nuclear pits reveals a gross ignorance.

Response: We did not call for the United States to abandon this ability. On the contrary, we suggested that the National Nuclear Security Administration aim for a less ambitious pit production capacity of 30 to 50 pits per year by 2035. So long as the United States remains a nuclear-armed state, it needs and should have the ability to produce plutonium cores for nuclear warhead refurbishment. But the current goal of producing 80 pits per year by 2030 is almost certainly unachievable. And it is unnecessary. As American Universitys Sharon Weiner has noted, assessing the underlying assumptions makes clear there are credible alternatives to the scale and planned start date for pit production.

The need for increased pit production could be reduced by pursuing less technically ambitious warhead life extension programs. For example, a near-term driver of establishing a production capacity of 80 pits annually is to support the replacement of the W78 warhead with the new W87-1. But there are alternatives that would not require a new pit for the W87-1, or at least not as many new pits as currently planned. These alternatives include a smaller intercontinental ballistic missile force, a less ambitious upgrade for the W78, or storing or retiring the W78 and relying on just one warhead for the land-based missile force.

In addition, there is no need to accelerate the development of a newly-designed submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead, known as the W93, as proposed in the fiscal 2021 budget request. The existing W76-1 submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead just completed a major life extension program that prolonged its service life until at least 2040. The existing W88 submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead, which is the youngest warhead in the stockpile, is undergoing a significant upgrade and is not expected to require further refurbishment until at least the late 2030s. It is also highly unlikely that the National Nuclear Security Administration will be able to support three major submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead modernization programs in the 2030s.

Modernization as leverage. Millers claim: Finally, it must be noted that the disarmament communitys call to reduce the US nuclear modernization program paradoxically jeopardizes the achievement of one of the communitys highest priority goals:achieving a new arms control treaty with Russia and potentially also with China.

Response: The notion that changes to the modernization program would undermine Americas ability to bring Russia and China to the negotiating table is unconvincing. First, even if the modernization program were an effective bargaining chip, the chip cant be cashed in anytime soon. The program wont produce any new delivery systems until the late 2020s at the earliest. Second, there is little evidence to suggest that the Obama administrations support for an extensive modernization program provided the administration with leverage during its second term to convince Moscow to join talks on nuclear reductions below New START. Third, Moscow has identified constraints on US non-nuclear weapons, such as missile defense and advanced conventional strike capabilities, as priority conditions for further Russian nuclear cuts. Fourth, the United States has long had a superior nuclear arsenal to China, but China has refused to participate in arms control.

In a democracy, national defense and nuclear policy plans, options, and trade-offs warrant scrutiny. We welcome serious debate; not distortions about our analysis and recommendations.

See original here:
Debating US nuclear spending in the age of the coronavirus - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

There is also the possibility that future nuclear-powered Coast Guard icebreakers could find themselves in aggressive confrontations with Russian or other countries' ships, especially in the Arctic region. This is what is certainly driving the demand to explore potential defensive armament for America's next icebreakers.

Trump's memorandum doesn't mention any specific armament options for the Coast Guard to consider, but its own requirements for its latest heavy icebreaker have included keeping space available for the possible inclusion of weapons of some kind in the future. In 2017, Admiral Paul Zukunft, then-Commandant of the Coast Guard, also told members of Congress that his service was looking at adding both defensive and offensive armament, including anti-ship cruise missiles, onto future icebreakers.

While talk of Coast Guard cutters of any kind, icebreaking or not, armed with anti-ship missiles might seem unusual, the service did upgrade at least three Hamilton class cutters in the 1980s to be able to fire RGM-84 Harpoons. By the mid-1990s, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, these ships had lost this capability, which you can read more about in this past War Zone piece. The entire class, of which two remain in U.S. service, also received additional defenses in the form of 20mm Mk 15 Phalanx Close-in Weapon Systems (CIWS) and Mk 38 25mm automatic cannon mounts.

Much of the rest of Trump's memorandum covers things the Coast Guard already appears to be doing or has done. The required assessments will examine fleet mixes to include at least three heavy icebreakers. The service has long said that it wants to acquire three medium icebreakers after it gets its trio of heavy types. The difference between the two categories is the thickness of ice they can plow through, with heavy designs being able to get through ice up to 10 feet thick, while the fulls of medium types can manage up to eight feet of ice.

"Use cases in the Arctic that span the full range of national and economic security missions (including the facilitation of resource exploration and exploitation and undersea cable laying and maintenance) that may be executed by a class of medium PSCs [Polar Security Cutters], as well as analysis of how these use cases differ with respect to the anticipated use of heavy PSCs for these same activities," the memo notes. "These use cases shall identify the optimal number and type of polar security icebreakers for ensuring a persistent presence in both the Arctic and, as appropriate, the Antarctic regions."

The Coast Guard, at present, only has one operational heavy icebreaker, the USCGC Polar Star, which is aging and prone to major breakdowns, and one newer medium one, the USCGC Healy, that is still decades-old now.

"Based on the determined fleet size and composition, an identification and assessment of at least two optimal United States basing locations and at least two international basing locations," the memo adds. "The basing location assessment shall include the costs, benefits, risks, and challenges related to infrastructure, crewing, and logistics and maintenance support for PSCs at these locations. In addition, this assessment shall account for potential burden-sharing opportunities for basing with the Department of Defense and allies and partners, as appropriate."

The Coast Guard's plan, as it stands now, is to hopefully have taken delivery of all three conventionally-powered heavy icebreakers by 2026. Polar Star could also undergo a service life extension upgrade to keep it in service through at least 2025. There is no firm schedule yet for acquiring the additional medium icebreakers. Trump's memo says there needs to be "a ready, capable, and available fleet of polar security icebreakers that is operationally tested and fully deployable by Fiscal Year 2029," by which time Polar Star and Healy are both expected to be retired.

Trump's memorandum requires the Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard to submit their respective reports to the President, by way of the Director of OMB and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, within the next 60 days. So, it may not be long before we learn whether America's icebreaker plans have changed to include the purchase of its first-ever nuclear-powered types.

Contact the author: joe@thedrive.com

Read more:
Trump Orders Coast Guard To Look Into Building Nuclear-Powered Icebreakers Like Russia - The Drive

Nichols Martin June 9, 2020News, Technology

USAF/NNSA

TheNational Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), under the Department of Energy (DoE), partnered with the U.S. Air Force (USAF) to test the weapon systems of aB61-12modified for extended service life. Two flight tests for theB61-12 Life Extension Program took place in March 2020 at theNevada-basedTonopah Test Range, the Department of Energy said Monday.

USAF and the NNSA demonstrated the aircraft's compatibility with theF-15E during the final weapon system demonstration. The modified B61-12 features a new Boeing-made tail kit assembly. The Air Force plans to replace aging B61 bombers with the new extended-life variant for part of the U.S. nuclear force.

The success of these tests is a major milestone on the path to full rate production and the B61-12s initial operation capability on the F-15E in the coming years, said Brig. Gen. Ty Neuman, principal assistant deputy administrator for military application at the NNSA.

Check Also

The Department of Homeland Security's science and technology (DHS S&T) directorate has awarded 26 contracts to 23 small businesses through the first phase of the Small Business Innovation Research Program to explore proofs-of-concept that may respond to homeland security technology concerns.

Read the original here:
DOE-USAF Partnership Tests Compatibility, Weapon Systems of Extended B61 Bomber - ExecutiveGov

Drawing by Nathaniel St. Clair

An article published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences recently argued that more species are going extinct due to human activity than occurred 66 million years ago, when an asteroid or similar hit the Earth.

Much less discussed is US President Donald Trumps (read: the military-industrial-complexs) Space Force, which Trump again championed at a recent address to the Kennedy Space Center, Florida. Space domination is Americas destiny, he told the audience. Referring to the protests that broke out across the US and the world, triggered by the slow suffocation on camera by a white cop of the unarmed, handcuffed black man, George Floyd, Trump said: I will not allow angry mobs to dominateunless they are angry mobs of police.

But what about calm mobs? The mob of military corporatists setting US weapons policy is calmly seeking to dominate space and thus the world. Trump went on to say: we will ensure a future of American dominance in space. This comes at a time when the US taxpayer is predicted to spend nearly half a trillion dollars over the next decade upgrading Americas aging nuclear weapons. The Space Force is integrating in various waystracking, surveillance, sensingwith the triad of nukes on land, in the air, and at sea.

PAVING THE WAY

In January 2017, the newly-unelected President Trump (he lost the popular vote by 2.9m), ordered the Department of Defense to conduct a Nuclear Posture Review. The document published a year later makes clear that the US possesses nuclear weapons, in part, so that our diplomats continue to speak from a position of strength on matters of war and peace. The Nuclear Posture Review cites Russia as the evil menace against which the US must defend by renewing its nuclear stockpiles.

But a Congressional Research Service report cites the view of US nuclear strategists who think that Russia has adopted an escalate to de-escalate strategy, where it might threaten to use nuclear weapons if it were losing a conflict with a NATO member, in an effort to convince the United States and its NATO allies to withdraw from the conflict. It notes that Russias modernization program began in the early-2000s. We might add that this was a couple of years after the US committed itself Full Spectrum Dominance of land, sea, air, and space. It was also around the time that the Bush II administration (2001-2009, which also lost the popular vote by half a million) pulled out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty 1972.

Arms Control Today reports that Trumps withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty 1987 leaves just the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) in place to limit U.S. and Russian nuclear weapons deployments. It notes that START 2010 is due to expire in February 2021. Moscow professed to want to negotiate instead of having the US simply withdraw. It then reiterated Russias commitments to match any US modernization and expansion of nuclear weapons. This is great for the US and Russian arms industries, but not so good for the prospects of human survival.

Part of the reason for withdrawing from the INF, according to US Defense Secretary Mark Esper, is to develop weapons to threaten China; though, of course, Esper puts it in different words, speaking instead of how great the development of an intermediate-range conventional weapon would be to the [Pacific Command] theater.

NUKES IN SPACE

On February 4th-5th, the Air Force Global Strike Command and 30th Space Wing test-launched the nuclear-capable Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile. The Space Force describes the ICBM as a unique portion of the Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) nuclear enterprise.

First deployed in 1979, the W78 nuclear warhead is being renewed at a cost to US taxpayers of $8.6 billion. The renewal program began under Obama in 2010. It is scheduled for deployment in 2030 and will be renamed W78-1. The W78-1 is designed to be carried by the Minuteman III ICBM, recently tested by the AFGSC in collaboration with the Space Force and 30th Space Wing. Meanwhile, there are other ominous developments afoot.

In 2019, the Missile Defense Review advocated for placing interceptors, which can equally mean first-strike missiles, in space: Space-basing may increase the overall likelihood of successfully intercepting offensive missiles, the document claims. It can reduce the number of U.S. defensive interceptors required to do so, and potentially destroy offensive missiles over the attackers territory rather than the targeted state.

At the end of May 2020, Raytheons Missiles and Defense branch offered a job with secret clearance to engineers with expertise in radiation effects. The job calls for radiation hardening designs for missile defense interceptors. Interceptors are well-known by strategists to be, dual-use, potential first-strike weapons. We are executing programs and investing in systems designed to work in nuclear weapons and space environments, the document says. The job description mentions interceptors, which, if the authors of the Missile Defense Review have their way, could end up being based in space.

UPGRADES

Under the Stockpile Stewardship Program, Los Alamos no longer detonates nuclear weapons to test them, relying instead on non-nuclear tests and computer simulations. The Lab maintains old nukes via the Life Extension Program: ironic, given that the weapons do little other than threaten death. The LEP involves the analysis, replacement, and refurbishment of components.

The B61-3, -4, -7, and 11 nuclear gravity bombs are deployed to US and NATO bases. The B61 has been in service for 50 years, making it the oldest and most versatile weapon in the enduring U.S. stockpile. Designed and engineered at Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories, the Life Extension Program will keep the device in service for an additional 20 years. The B61-12 is being certified for delivery by current strategic and dual-capable aircraft, as well as future aircraft platforms. If we are interested in survival as a species, the dual-use element is problematic because Russian, Chinese, or other adversaries can never be sure whether the given bomber plane in or near their airspace is carrying nuclear weapons. This puts their militaries on high-alert and increases the likelihood of escalation through misunderstanding.

The W88 nuclear warheads Life Extension Program (LEP) started in 2012, again under Obama. The W88 came into service in 1988 with the Trident II D5 submarine-launched ballistic missile. The LEP will replace the arming, firing, and fusion system, and refreshes the weapons conventional high explosives, for safety reasons, of course. The LEP is compartmentalized across several labs. Los Alamos is in charge of W76-2 mod, a LEP for another Trident II D5 submarine-launched ballistic missile.

The W76-1 produces a high-yield and is, counterintuitively, safer for the world in some ways because enemies know that they will be obliterated and are therefore less likely to engage in the kind of warfighting that can lead to escalation. First produced in 2019 at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, the W76-2 on the other hand produces a lower-yield explosion, blurring the lines between nuclear and non-nuclear war. Lower-yield weapons are more tempting for commanders and world leaders to use, but they risk retaliation from states with high-yield weapons and thus uncontrollable nuclear escalation. Los Alamos describes the W76-2 mod as a milestone in support of a national security initiative requested by the president in the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review.

The W80-1 is being extended at Lawrence Livermore via the W80-4, which will be ready by 2031. The scientists explain that the insensitive high explosive, triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB), will be used for the warheads main charge. Engineers and chemists at Lawrence Livermore are helping to restart the TATB production process after 30 years of dormancy.

In April 2020, Raytheon won the contract to develop the Long Range Standoff Weapon (LRSO) for the US Air Force, on which the W80-4 will be placed. The LRSO will be capable of both nuclear and conventional strikes, says Defense News, which means that Russia and China will be on high-alert and prone to escalation in error, as the article later admits.

CONCLUSION: DIRECT THAT ENERGY

As Extinction Rebellion largely obeys COVID lockdown, Black Lives Matter and other solidarity groups take to the streets nationally and internationally. Militarized police push young, unarmed women to the ground, use their shields to knock over old men, and even fire their paint guns at people standing in their doorways filming. We have an out-of-control, predatory neoliberal economic system, a powder keg of 40 million unemployed Americans, a climate heating up by the day, causing wildfires in the Arctic, and a grim swing towards a new kind of buffoonish authoritarianism, with Bolsonaro in Brazil, BoJo the Clown in the UK, and the manic Narcissist-in-Chief in the White House running the most powerful nation on Earth.

As if all of this wasnt bad enough, world-threatening nukes are being modernized and incrementally based in space. We need a broad left coalition of Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter, and a revived anti-nuclear campaign to team up with anti-space-weapons networks to, if not end this madness, at least mitigate it. Unless we succeed, we might not be here to rebel against our extinction.

Originally posted here:
Nukes in Space: the Extinction Rebellion Yet to Be - CounterPunch.org - CounterPunch

Global Wellness Supplements Market study with 100+ market data Tables, Pie Chat, Graphs & Figures is now released by Data Bridge Market Research. The report presents a complete assessment of the Market covering future trend, current growth factors, attentive opinions, facts, and industry validated market data forecast till 2026. Delivering the key insights pertaining to this industry, the report provides an in-depth analysis of the latest trends, present and future business scenario, market size and share of Major Players such asLife Extension, OPTAVIA, Beachbody, LLC, Natures Sunshine Products, Inc, Organo Gold., Thrive Life, LLC, PhytoscienceTrevo, Oriflame Cosmetics AG, Melaleuca Inc, Shaklee Corporation, Arbonne International, LLC., Forever Living.com, L.L.C, Juice Plus+.

TheGlobal Wellness Supplements Marketis expected to reach USD 384.30 Billion by 2025, from USD 204.72 million in 2017 growing at a CAGR of 6.5% during the forecast period of 2018 to 2025. The upcoming market report contains data for historic year 2016, the base year of calculation is 2017 and the forecast period is 2018 to 2025.

Get Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts @https://databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-wellness-supplements-market

Global Wellness Supplements Market By Product (Dietary Supplements, Functional/Fortified Food & Beverages and Food intolerance products and Dermo-Cosmetic Skin Essentials), By Geography (North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa) Industry Trends and Forecast to 2025

Major Market Competitors/Players:

Some of the major players operating in the global wellness supplement market are Life Extension, OPTAVIA, Beachbody, LLC, Natures Sunshine Products, Inc, Organo Gold., Thrive Life, LLC, Phytoscience Trvo, Oriflame Cosmetics AG, Melaleuca Inc, Shaklee Corporation, Arbonne International, LLC., Forever Living.com, L.L.C, Juice Plus+, Herbalife International of America, Inc, and Isagenix Worldwide LLC, Nikken Inc., Wellness Resources, Inc., The Daily Wellness Company, Otsuka Holdings Co. Ltd, Glanbia plc, Nestle, Nuskin, USANA Health Sciences, Inc. A and among others

Major Market Drivers and Restraints:

Reasons to Purchase this Report

Customization of the Report

Grab Your Report at an Impressive Discount! Please click[emailprotected]https://databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-discount/global-wellness-supplements-market

Market Segmentation:Global Wellness Supplements Market

About Us:

Data Bridge set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavors to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Data bridge is an aftermath of sheer wisdom and experience which was formulated and framed in the year 2015 in Pune. We ponder into the heterogeneous markets in accord with our clients needs and scoop out the best possible solutions and detailed information about the market trends. Data Bridge delve into the markets across Asia, North America, South America, Africa to name few.

Data Bridge adepts in creating satisfied clients who reckon upon our services and rely on our hard work with certitude. We are content with our glorious 99.9 % client satisfying rate.

Contact:

Data Bridge Market Research

Tel: +1-888-387-2818

Email:[emailprotected]

Continued here:
PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS OF HOW COVID-19 IS IMPACTING THE GLOBAL WELLNESS SUPPLEMENTS MARKET | LIFE EXTENSION, OPTAVIA, BEACHBODY, LLC, NATURE'S SUNSHINE...

SAN DIEGO, June 05, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pfenex Inc. (NYSE American: PFNX) announced today that Eef Schimmelpennink, President and Chief Executive Officer, will participate in a fire side chat at the William Blair Growth Stock Conference on June 9, 2020. The discussion will be virtual and accessible at http://www.wsw.com/webcast/blair56/pfnx.

Interested parties can access the live audio webcast and archive from the Investors Section of Pfenex's website at http://www.pfenex.com.

About Pfenex Inc.Pfenex is a development and licensing biotechnology company focused on leveraging its Pfenex Expression Technology to develop and improve protein therapies for unmet patient needs. Using the patented Pfenex Expression Technology platform, Pfenex has created an advanced pipeline of potential therapeutic equivalents, and vaccines. Pfenexs lead product candidate is PF708, a therapeutic equivalent candidate to Forteo (teriparatide injection). PF708 has been approved in the U.S. for the treatment of osteoporosis in certain patients at high risk for fracture, and marketing authorization applications are pending in other jurisdictions. In addition, Pfenex is developing hematology/oncology products in collaboration with Jazz Pharmaceuticals, including PF743, a recombinant crisantaspase, and PF745, a recombinant crisantaspase with half-life extension technology. Pfenex also uses its Pfenex Expression Technology platform to produce CRM197, a diphtheria toxoid carrier protein used in prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines.

Pfenex investors and others should note that Pfenex announces material information to the public about Pfenex through a variety of means, including its website (http://www.pfenex.com/), its investor relations website (http://pfenex.investorroom.com/), press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls, corporate Twitter account (https://twitter.com/pfenex), Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/Pfenex-Inc-105908276167776/timeline/), and LinkedIn page (https://www.linkedin.com/company/pfenex-inc) in order to achieve broad, non-exclusionary distribution of information to the public and to comply with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Pfenex encourages its investors and others to monitor and review the information Pfenex makes public in these locations as such information could be deemed to be material information. Please note that this list may be updated from time to time.

Company Contact:investorrelations@pfenex.com

See the original post here:
Pfenex to Participate in the William Blair Growth Stock Conference - GlobeNewswire

Enel Green Power has announced that it has been awarded 68 MW of new renewable capacity for two wind projects and 38.3 MW of nominal capacity deriving from the repowering of already-operational hydro plants in the second renewable auction launched by the state-owned energy service company GSE (Gestore Servizi Energetici) in Italy.

Specifically, the company participated in the 500 MW tender for new wind and solar projects and the 98.5 MW tender for renovations of renewable plants with a capacity exceeding 1 MW.

Regarding the new capacity, the two wind farms are located in Campania and Basilicata. The upgrading and useful life extension concern the three hydro plants already operating in the municipalities of Castiglione dei Pepoli (Bologna), Civitella in Val di Chiana (Arezzo) and Montecreto (Modena).

With this second award we confirm the commitment to invest in new renewable capacity in Italy, contributing to the challenging decarbonisation objectives of the Enel Group and the country,saidAntonio Cammisecra, CEO of Enel Green Power and Head of the Global Power Generation business line. Thanks to our development strategy, in 2019 the Groups installed capacity from renewables exceeded that from thermal sources globally, marking a further step forward towards the progressive replacement of fossil fuels with zero-emission ones.

The firm has stated that the construction of new capacity and the upgrading of existing plants in Italy are part of the wider commitment of the Enel Group to the growth of renewables and to decarbonisation which in our country foresees, in the 2020-2022 period, the development of new renewable capacity for around 700 MW and for which EGP has developed a pipeline of approximately 1.3 GW of opportunities that can start operating in the same period.

In the second auction conducted by GSE, wind won 406 MW of the 425 MW awarded in an undersubscribed auction 500 MW was on offer.

The primary reason for the undersubscription is Italys cumbersome and lengthy permitting process, stated WindEurope. Besides the challenges with permitting, the auction was also undersubscribed because repowering projects were not allowed to bid. This is significant. Italy has huge repowering potential: almost half of Italys installed wind fleet (10 GW) will reach the end of its operational life by 2030. The fact that repowering projects could not bid in the auction makes no sense.

Onshore wind accounted for the entire 406 MW of the 425 MW awarded in the most recent auction. The price range was from EUR 56/MWh to EUR 68.4/MWh. The weighted average was EUR 64.6/MWh.

Go here to read the rest:
Enel Awarded 106.3 MW in Italy in GSE's Second Auction - Saurenergy

The Cracow Gold Mine is on track to produce 82,500 87,500 ounces of gold in the 2020 financial year and generate net mine cash flow of $84 to $89 million.

() has entered into a binding agreement with () to acquire the Cracow Gold Mine in Queensland.

Cracow is an established, high grade, low-cost underground gold mining operation and processing facility operating continuously since 2004, producing more than 1.4 million ounces over its life, with a consistent track record of profitability and reserve replacement.

The mine is on track to produce 82,500 87,500 ounces of gold in the 2020 financial year and generate net mine cash flow of $84 to $89 million.

Aeris has agreed to pay Evolution $60 million in cash upon closing of the transaction, a deferred payment of $15 million on June 30, 2022 plus a 10% net value royalty from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2027, capped at $50 million.

Completion of the transaction is expected to occur on June 30, 2020.

Aeris executive chairman Andre Labuschagne said: This is a truly transformational transaction for Aeris and will be immediately accretive in value.

The acquisition provides us with asset and commodity diversity, strong cashflow generation and high value synergies.

Cracow will be a perfect fit for the unique skill set of our management team, who have a track record of extracting value and life extensions, as demonstrated at the Tritton mine, and previously with Norton Gold Fields at the Paddington gold mine. Our immediate focus will be on transitioning Cracow into the Aeris culture and aggressively investing in the mine life extension opportunities we have identified.

Labuschagne added: Aeris inherits a well-run, proven operation which has been a consistent performer for Evolution.

Importantly for us, there is a strong operating team in place that has a culture of continuous improvement.

We are confident that Cracow management and the workforce will fit well with Aeris own culture and the renewed focus to reinvesting in mine life extensions which Aeris will bring.

Aeris intends to fund the transaction through a fully underwritten $40 million equity raising and a $30 million acquisition bridge debt facility.

A new $15 million guarantee facility has also been secured to provide for the replacement of financial assurances relating to the mine and will be provided by SPOV (Special Portfolio Opportunity V), a subsidiary of a fund managed by PAG.

The equity raising will be conducted via a fully underwritten institutional placement and an underwritten 2.02 for 1 pro-rata accelerated renounceable entitlement offer.

Aeris has already secured commitments from its three largest shareholders, representing about 60% of the register to commit to participating in the equity raising, subject to a maximum holding of 19.99% at completion.

The Cracow Gold Mine is about 500 kilometres north-west of Brisbane in a highly endowed goldfield with gold mineralisation hosted in steeply dipping structurally controlled low sulphidation epithermal veins.

The underground mine is accessed through a single surface decline with ore primarily mined via open stoping through a modified Avoca mining sequence.

Cracow has a strong track record of reserve and resource replacement and Aeris plans to aggressively invest in brownfield and greenfield exploration with the aim of growing the resource base to extend mine life.

Multiple near term opportunities for resource conversion have been identified with about $13 million budgeted over the next two years for exploration, with key priorities including both underground near-mine extensions (e.g. Killarney) as well as nearby open-pit deposits (e.g. the Golden Plateau and Roses Pride).

Extracting value through integration efficiencies will also be a key driver of Aeris immediate plan with about $4 million of targeted annual cost synergies as well as the potential for utilising Aeris existing carried forward tax losses ($256 million at June 30, 2019).

Over the two year period to June 30, 2022, Aeris expects Cracow to generate more than $100 million of net mine cash flows at the current gold price, with pro forma Aeris group EBITDA of $272 million to $282 million and pro forma group net mine cash flows of $137 million to $155 million.

This significant cashflow will provide for both investment in life of mine extension projects at Cracow and Tritton as well as to also continue deleveraging Aeris balance sheet.

To protect the very significant near term positive cashflows from Cracow, Aeris intends to enter a prudent gold hedging program, with an initial focus on the first 12 months.

See more here:
Aeris Resources to acquire producing gold mine from Evolution in transformational move - Proactive Investors Australia

CORAL SPRINGS, FL Swimming coach. Fire equipment. Medical evaluations.

These were among the projects and expenses approved Wednesday by Coral Springs City Commission at a cost of at least $679,800.

Heres what commissioners approved during their June 3 public meeting:

Our newsletter delivers the local news that you can trust.

- Swim coach services from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2022. Swim Phish, Inc. of Coral Springs will get annual stipend of $25,000.

- Fire equipment parts, supplies, and service from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. Ten-8 Fire Equipment, Inc. of Bradenton, Fla, will get estimated annual payment of $75,000.

- Tandem axle truck. SBL Freightliner LLC/Lou Bachrodt Freightliner of Pompano Beach will be paid $127,170.

- Maintenance and inspection of building automation systems citywide from June 4, 2020 to June 3, 2021. Design Controls, Inc/DCI Systems Group, Inc. of Oakland Park will get annual payment of up to $100,000.

- Medical evaluations/physicals. Life Extension Clinics, Inc. of Tampa will get annual payment of $140,000.

- Security guard services from June 16 to March 8, 2025. Universal Protection Service, LLC/Allied Universal Security Services, LLC of Santa Ana, Ca. will get annual payment of $212,800.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter and sign up for FREE TAPinto Coral Springs E-News alerts to be the first to read about all things Coral Springs.

Download the FREE TAPinto App.Click here for Android-Click here for iOSfor breaking news, traffic/weather alerts, and special offers.

Know a story we should share with our readers? Email editor Leon Fooksman (lfooksman@tapinto.net) and tell him about it.

Read more from the original source:
Coral Springs Approves Spending of At Least $679800 on Projects and Expenses - TAPinto.net

This detailed market study covers eye health supplements market growth potentials which can assist the stake holders to understand key trends and prospects in eye health supplements market identifying the growth opportunities and competitive scenarios. The report also focuses on data from different primary and secondary sources, and is analyzed using various tools. It helps to gain insights into the markets growth potential, which can help investors identify scope and opportunities. The analysis also provides details of each segment in the global eye health supplements market

Get Sample Copy of This Report @https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/request-sample-67629?utm_source=AZ&utm_medium=SG

According to the report, the eye health supplements market report points out national and global business prospects and competitive conditions for eye health supplements. Market size estimation and forecasts were given based on a detailed research methodology tailored to the conditions of the demand for eye health supplements. The eye health supplements market has been segmented by ingredient type (lutein and zeaxanthin, antioxidants, omega-3 fatty acids, coenzyme q10, flavonoids, astaxanthin, alpha-lipoic acid, other ingredients), by indication type (age-related macular degeneration (amd), cataract, dry eye syndrome, other indications), by form (tablet, capsule, others). Historical background for the demand of eye health supplements has been studied according to organic and inorganic innovations in order to provide accurate estimates of the market size. Primary factors influencing the growth of the demand eye health supplements have also been established with potential gravity.

Regional segmentation and analysis to understand growth patterns:

The market has been segmented in major regions to understand the global development and demand patterns of this market.

North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific by region are estimated to dominate the eye health supplements market during the forecast period. These regions have been market leaders for the overall healthcare sector in terms of technological developments and advanced medical treatments. Moreover, the government policies have been favourable for the growth of the healthcare infrastructure in these regions. North America and Europe have an established healthcare infrastructure for product innovations and early adaptations. This is expected to drive the demand for eye health supplements market during the forecast period.

Get ToC for the overview of the premium report @https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/request-toc-67629?utm_source=AZ&utm_medium=SG

The US, Germany, France, UK, Canada, and Spain have been some the major markets in the region. Asia Pacific is estimated to register one of highest CAGR for eye health supplements market during the forecast period. This region has witnessed strategic investments by global companies to cater the growing demand in the recent years. China, Japan, India, South Korea, and Australia are amongst some of the key countries for eye health supplements market in the region. Other regions including Middle East, Europe, and Rest of the World (South America and Africa) are estimated to be emerging markets for eye health supplements market during the forecast period.

This report provides:

1) An overview of the global market for eye health supplements market and related technologies.2) Analysis of global market trends, yearly estimates and annual growth rate projections for compounds (CAGRs).

3) Identification of new market opportunities and targeted consumer marketing strategies for global eye health supplements market .4) Analysis of R&D and demand for new technologies and new applications5) Extensive company profiles of key players in industry.

Make an Inquiry for purchasing this Report @https://www.quincemarketinsights.com/enquiry-before-buying/enquiry-before-buying-67629?utm_source=AZ&utm_medium=SG

The researchers have studied the market in depth and have developed important segments such as product type, application and region. Each and every segment and its sub-segments are analyzed based on their market share, growth prospects and CAGR. Each market segment offers in-depth, both qualitative and quantitative information on market outlook.

With an emphasis on strategies there have been several primary developments done by major companies such as Vitabiotics Ltd., Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., Life Extension, Pfizer Inc., OmniActive Health Technologies, Algatechnologies, Alliance Pharma, The Natures Bounty Co., Novartis AG, and Amway Corp.

Market Segmentation:

By Ingredient Type:o Lutein and Zeaxanthino Antioxidantso Omega-3 Fatty Acidso Coenzyme Q10o Flavonoidso Astaxanthino Alpha-Lipoic Acido Other Ingredients

By Indication Type:o Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)o Cataracto Dry Eye Syndromeo Other Indications

By Form:o Tableto Capsuleo Others

By Region:

North America Eye Health Supplements Marketo North America, by CountryUSCanadaMexicoo North America, by Ingredient Typeo North America, by Indication Typeo North America, by Form

Europe Eye Health Supplements Marketo Europe, by CountryGermanyRussiaUKFranceItalySpainThe NetherlandsRest of Europeo Europe, by Ingredient Typeo Europe, by Indication Typeo Europe, by Form

Asia Pacific Eye Health Supplements Marketo Asia Pacific, by CountryChinaIndiaJapanSouth KoreaAustraliaIndonesiaRest of Asia Pacifico Asia Pacific, by Ingredient Typeo Asia Pacific, by Indication Typeo Asia Pacific, by Form

Middle East & Africa Eye Health Supplements Marketo Middle East & Africa, by CountryUAESaudi ArabiaQatarSouth AfricaRest of Middle East & Africao Middle East & Africa, by Ingredient Typeo Middle East & Africa, by Indication Typeo Middle East & Africa, by Form

South America Eye Health Supplements Marketo South America, by CountryBrazilArgentinaColombiaRest of South Americao South America, by Ingredient Typeo South America, by Indication Typeo South America, by Form

Reasons to Buy This Report:

o Provides niche insights for decision about every possible segment helping in strategic decision making process.o Market size estimation of the eye health supplements market on a regional and global basis.

o A unique research design for market size estimation and forecast.o Identification of major companies operating in the market with related developmentso Exhaustive scope to cover all the possible segments helping every stakeholder in the eye health supplements

Customization:

This study is customized to meet your specific requirements:

o By Segmento By Sub-segmento By Region/Countryo Product Specific Competitive Analysis

Contact:Quince Market InsightsAjay D. (Knowledge Partner)Office No- A109Pune, Maharashtra 411028Phone: US +1 208 405 2835 UK +44 121 364 6144 APAC +91 706 672 4848Email: sales@quincemarketinsights.comWeb:www.quincemarketinsights.com

ABOUT US:QMI has the most comprehensive collection of market research products and services available on the web. We deliver reports from virtually all major publications and refresh our list regularly to provide you with immediate online access to the worlds most extensive and up-to-date archive of professional insights into global markets, companies, goods, and patterns.

See original here:
Eye Health Supplements Market : Prospective Growth Trends & Incremental Opportunity Assessment till... - Azizsalon News

VANCOUVERThe crucial piece of safety equipment that offered the last chance to save the life of Capt. Jenn Casey when she ejected from a Snowbird CT-114 Tutor Jet earlier this month had been targeted for replacement by a much more sophisticated system as far back as 2015, military records show.

Twelve days after the tragedy, the military wont say whether the Canadian Forces fleets ejection seats have yet been replaced, or whether the ejection seats used by Casey and pilot Capt. Richard MacDougall that day were still an outdated technology that the military knew was less effective at saving lives in the flying conditions used by the Snowbirds than more modern systems.

Although the cause of the crash that took place in Kamloops, B.C., moments after the Snowbirds CT-114 Tutor Jet took off is not yet publicly known, one thing is certain: MacDougall and Casey both ejected from the plane, their lives depending on the absolute last resort safety equipment available to them ejection seats.

While MacDougall survived the ejection, Casey did not. And there is no question that modern ejection seat technology the Department of National Defence planned to place in the Snowbirds fleet offers a greater chance of survival for the kinds of scenarios in which the Snowbirds fly, compared to the older ejection seats originally used in the Tutor jets.

Its led aviation safety experts across the country to ask the question: Could the jets technology have given Casey a better chance of survival?

The Department of Defence did not respond to repeated questions about the state of the ejection seats on the jets first built in 1965.

Ejection seats have a certain set of parameters called an envelope in which they will work as expected and give the person ejecting the greatest chance for survival.

State of the art ejection seats work in whats called zero-zero conditions, meaning the plane can be at zero altitude, and zero air speed, and the seat will still rocket the occupant high enough in the air for the parachute to open and the occupant to land safely.

Older ejection seats can also save lives, but they work under more limited conditions. The ejection seats original to the Snowbirds jets were manufactured by Weber Aircraft. According to several experts, the seats work from zero altitude if the plane is travelling at a speed of 60 knots. The direction of the plane also influences the effectiveness of the seat, while this is a less important factor with the zero-zero seats.

In the case of the Snowbirds, they are regularly in high-risk circumstances for ejection: They fly at high speeds, close together, at low altitude and perform aerobatics.

What matters, that most important component of any single-engine, high-speed military aircraft, is that youve got to have an ejector seat that will allow the survival of the occupant in the kind of manoeuvres that the plane performs, said John Pottinger, a longtime aviation safety expert based in Vancouver.

If the Snowbirds are still using the old Weber seats, Pottinger says, We have not reduced the risk to a level most Canadians would consider acceptable.

The military has been aware of the aging nature of the CT-114 ejection system, and has expressed a need to replace it as far back as 2015, when the national Defence Department released a report on a project then called the CT-114 Life Extension Beyond 2020.

The upgrade may include replacing wing components, replacing the ejection seat with a zero/zero capability and improving the wheel breaks to allow operations at remote locations, the 2015 document reads.

An official record of the project under the Department of National Defences investment plan, updated in January makes no mention of ejection seats. In an email, a spokesperson for the department told the Star the project is in the options analysis phase. The spokesperson did not respond to repeated questions about whether the ejection seats have been updated as part of the project.

Media reports from 2016 showed the military did test an updated ejection seat for the CT-114 Tutor off the back of a Dodge Ram. The Department of Defence did not respond to questions about whether that test led to updates to the Tutor jets.

The defence spokesperson wrote in an email that the intention of the CT-114 Life Extension Beyond 2020 is to update the CT-114 jets so theyre usable until 2030. Thats a change from previous plans detailed by the department in 2012 media reports, which said the 1960s jets would be retired by 2020.

The CT-114 Tutor aircraft has proven to be a very resilient platform to maintain and upgrade, a portion of the email reads. On-aircraft maintenance is done by RCAF technicians from 431 Sqn on a regular basis, and an additional Periodic Inspection is completed by IMP Aerospace every 400 flying hours. This includes further maintenance and repairs to ensure the aircraft remains serviceable for first-line operations.

Pottinger, who has worked in aviation safety for more than three decades, including time at Transport Canada, said that when it comes to the age of the Snowbirds fleet, the ejection seat is one of the most important safety features to keep up-to-date.

He said there are two ways to mitigate risk: You can reduce the risk of the activity itself, and you can reduce the consequences of the risky action. For example, when it comes to driving, stop signs are an example of the first way, while seatbelts are an example of the second.

Flight, especially in a single-engine, high-speed jet performing aerobatics close to the ground, is inherently risky, Pottinger said. So the choices National Defence makes about reducing the consequences of risky activity are especially important.

You decide: Can you retrofit one of the more modern ejection seats into Tutor jets, or not?

Start your morning with everything you need to know, and nothing you don't. Sign up for First Up, the Star's new daily email newsletter.

Its possible, due to the size and weight of the Tutor jets, that the answer would be no. In that case, Pottinger said the military would have to consider the cost of replacing the Tutors with newer jets, or stopping the program altogether. But to him, the risk of carrying on the Snowbirds program with inferior ejection technology is unacceptable.

Ejection was also an issue in a Snowbirds crash in October 2019, though it is unclear what went wrong.

An initial investigator report for a crash at the Atlanta Motor Speedway in Georgia, when pilot Capt. Kevin Domon-Grenier successfully ejected and survived, states that Domon-Grenier reported anomalies with the ejection system during the incident.

The crash also brought back memories of the last time a Snowbird member died in a crash.

Every May, Rob Mitchell and his former Snowbirds squadron plan to get together to remember Capt. Shawn McCaughey, who died during an air show practice exactly 13 years ago.

We call it Shawns gift to us, he said. Its that eternal connection.

Already bonded by living, travelling and flying together, Mitchell believes that the Snowbirds crew he headed in 2007 and 2008 were drawn especially close by the terrible tragedy they witnessed. On May 18, 2007, McCaugheys plane crashed during a practice show. His seatbelt failed, and the 31-year-old captain died on the spot.

A report released two years later concluded that a faulty seatbelt system the military had known about and delayed updating for five years contributed to his death.

Almost 13 years later, Mitchell watched the videos of another Snowbirds plane plunging to the ground with disbelief and dread. He saw the two streaks of smoke showing that the pilot and passenger had ejected from the CT-114 Tutor jet.

Ejection, Mitchell said, is nothing like jumping out of an airplane with a parachute. Its high-stakes safety equipment designed to shoot airplane occupants out of the aircraft high enough into the air so that the parachute expands.

The act of ejecting is a very violent thing, it propels you out of a jet at over 20 G, Mitchell said. G-force is short for gravitational force equivalent, a measure of acceleration. By comparison, jets that race in competition have a maximum G-force of 10.

The fact that the pilot of the May 17 crash survived, but Casey did not, left Mitchell with a familiar knot in his stomach, and a puzzle.

Like anything in life, theres a design limitation, air speed, altitude, nose position that is calculated when they make this machinery and there are certain envelopes for that seat and I want to know how close to that envelope they were, Mitchell said.

Being that close to it when one person makes it and one doesnt, it makes you go: What was it that made the difference?

Go here to read the rest:
Snowbirds were waiting for new ejection seats before deadly crash. Now DND wont say if gear was replaced - Toronto Star

The market research report is a brilliant, complete, and much-needed resource for companies, stakeholders, and investors interested in the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market. It informs readers about key trends and opportunities in the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market along with critical market dynamics expected to impact the global market growth. It offers a range of market analysis studies, including production and consumption, sales, industry value chain, competitive landscape, regional growth, and price. On the whole, it comes out as an intelligent resource that companies can use to gain a competitive advantage in the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market.

Key companies operating in the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market include , Natures Way Reishi, Solaray Reishi Mushroom, Life Extension Reishi Extract, Host Defense Reishi, Terrasoul Superfoods, Swanson Reishi Mushroom, Aloha Medicinals, Mushroom Science, Planetary Herbals Reishi Mushroom Supplements

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) :

https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1733074/global-reishi-mushroom-supplements-market

Segmental Analysis

Both developed and emerging regions are deeply studied by the authors of the report. The regional analysis section of the report offers a comprehensive analysis of the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market on the basis of region. Each region is exhaustively researched about so that players can use the analysis to tap into unexplored markets and plan powerful strategies to gain a foothold in lucrative markets.

Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Segment By Type:

, Organic Reishi Mushroom Supplements, Inorganic Reishi Mushroom Supplements Reishi Mushroom Supplements

Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Segment By Application:

, Online Sales, Offline Sales

Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. From the nature of competition to future changes in the vendor landscape, the report provides in-depth analysis of the competition in the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market.

Key companies operating in the global Reishi Mushroom Supplements market include , Natures Way Reishi, Solaray Reishi Mushroom, Life Extension Reishi Extract, Host Defense Reishi, Terrasoul Superfoods, Swanson Reishi Mushroom, Aloha Medicinals, Mushroom Science, Planetary Herbals Reishi Mushroom Supplements

Key questions answered in the report:

For Discount, Customization in the Report: https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1733074/global-reishi-mushroom-supplements-market

TOC

1 Study Coverage1.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Product Introduction1.2 Market Segments1.3 Key Reishi Mushroom Supplements Manufacturers Covered: Ranking by Revenue1.4 Market by Type 1.4.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Growth Rate by Type 1.4.2 Organic Reishi Mushroom Supplements 1.4.3 Inorganic Reishi Mushroom Supplements1.5 Market by Application 1.5.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Growth Rate by Application 1.5.2 Online Sales 1.5.3 Offline Sales1.6 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Reishi Mushroom Supplements Industry Impact 1.6.1 How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Reishi Mushroom Supplements Industry 1.6.1.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Business Impact Assessment Covid-19 1.6.1.2 Supply Chain Challenges 1.6.1.3 COVID-19s Impact On Crude Oil and Refined Products 1.6.2 Market Trends and Reishi Mushroom Supplements Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape 1.6.3 Measures / Proposal against Covid-19 1.6.3.1 Government Measures to Combat Covid-19 Impact 1.6.3.2 Proposal for Reishi Mushroom Supplements Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact1.7 Study Objectives1.8 Years Considered 2 Executive Summary2.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Estimates and Forecasts 2.1.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue 2015-2026 2.1.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales 2015-20262.2 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size by Region: 2020 Versus 2026 2.2.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Retrospective Market Scenario in Sales by Region: 2015-2020 2.2.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Retrospective Market Scenario in Revenue by Region: 2015-2020 3 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Competitor Landscape by Players3.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Manufacturers 3.1.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 3.1.2 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)3.2 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Manufacturers 3.2.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 3.2.2 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 3.2.3 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI) (2015-2020) 3.2.4 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue in 2019 3.2.5 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)3.3 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Price by Manufacturers3.4 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Manufacturing Base Distribution, Product Types 3.4.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Manufacturers Manufacturing Base Distribution, Headquarters 3.4.2 Manufacturers Reishi Mushroom Supplements Product Type 3.4.3 Date of International Manufacturers Enter into Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market3.5 Manufacturers Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 4 Breakdown Data by Type (2015-2026)4.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 4.1.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Type (2015-2020) 4.1.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Type (2015-2020) 4.1.3 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Average Selling Price (ASP) by Type (2015-2026)4.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 4.2.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 4.2.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 4.2.3 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Average Selling Price (ASP) Forecast by Type (2021-2026)4.3 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End 5 Breakdown Data by Application (2015-2026)5.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.1.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Application (2015-2020) 5.1.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Application (2015-2020) 5.1.3 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Price by Application (2015-2020)5.2 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 5.2.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 5.2.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 5.2.3 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Price Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 6 North America6.1 North America Reishi Mushroom Supplements by Country 6.1.1 North America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Country 6.1.2 North America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Country 6.1.3 U.S. 6.1.4 Canada6.2 North America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Type6.3 North America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Application 7 Europe7.1 Europe Reishi Mushroom Supplements by Country 7.1.1 Europe Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Country 7.1.2 Europe Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Country 7.1.3 Germany 7.1.4 France 7.1.5 U.K. 7.1.6 Italy 7.1.7 Russia7.2 Europe Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Type7.3 Europe Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Application 8 Asia Pacific8.1 Asia Pacific Reishi Mushroom Supplements by Region 8.1.1 Asia Pacific Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Region 8.1.2 Asia Pacific Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Region 8.1.3 China 8.1.4 Japan 8.1.5 South Korea 8.1.6 India 8.1.7 Australia 8.1.8 Taiwan 8.1.9 Indonesia 8.1.10 Thailand 8.1.11 Malaysia 8.1.12 Philippines 8.1.13 Vietnam8.2 Asia Pacific Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Type8.3 Asia Pacific Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Application 9 Latin America9.1 Latin America Reishi Mushroom Supplements by Country 9.1.1 Latin America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Country 9.1.2 Latin America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Country 9.1.3 Mexico 9.1.4 Brazil 9.1.5 Argentina9.2 Central & South America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Type9.3 Central & South America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Application 10 Middle East and Africa10.1 Middle East and Africa Reishi Mushroom Supplements by Country 10.1.1 Middle East and Africa Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales by Country 10.1.2 Middle East and Africa Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue by Country 10.1.3 Turkey 10.1.4 Saudi Arabia 10.1.5 U.A.E10.2 Middle East and Africa Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Type10.3 Middle East and Africa Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Facts & Figures by Application 11 Company Profiles11.1 Natures Way Reishi 11.1.1 Natures Way Reishi Corporation Information 11.1.2 Natures Way Reishi Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.1.3 Natures Way Reishi Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.1.4 Natures Way Reishi Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.1.5 Natures Way Reishi Recent Development11.2 Solaray Reishi Mushroom 11.2.1 Solaray Reishi Mushroom Corporation Information 11.2.2 Solaray Reishi Mushroom Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.2.3 Solaray Reishi Mushroom Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.2.4 Solaray Reishi Mushroom Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.2.5 Solaray Reishi Mushroom Recent Development11.3 Life Extension Reishi Extract 11.3.1 Life Extension Reishi Extract Corporation Information 11.3.2 Life Extension Reishi Extract Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.3.3 Life Extension Reishi Extract Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.3.4 Life Extension Reishi Extract Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.3.5 Life Extension Reishi Extract Recent Development11.4 Host Defense Reishi 11.4.1 Host Defense Reishi Corporation Information 11.4.2 Host Defense Reishi Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.4.3 Host Defense Reishi Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.4.4 Host Defense Reishi Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.4.5 Host Defense Reishi Recent Development11.5 Terrasoul Superfoods 11.5.1 Terrasoul Superfoods Corporation Information 11.5.2 Terrasoul Superfoods Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.5.3 Terrasoul Superfoods Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.5.4 Terrasoul Superfoods Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.5.5 Terrasoul Superfoods Recent Development11.6 Swanson Reishi Mushroom 11.6.1 Swanson Reishi Mushroom Corporation Information 11.6.2 Swanson Reishi Mushroom Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.6.3 Swanson Reishi Mushroom Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.6.4 Swanson Reishi Mushroom Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.6.5 Swanson Reishi Mushroom Recent Development11.7 Aloha Medicinals 11.7.1 Aloha Medicinals Corporation Information 11.7.2 Aloha Medicinals Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.7.3 Aloha Medicinals Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.7.4 Aloha Medicinals Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.7.5 Aloha Medicinals Recent Development11.8 Mushroom Science 11.8.1 Mushroom Science Corporation Information 11.8.2 Mushroom Science Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.8.3 Mushroom Science Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.8.4 Mushroom Science Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.8.5 Mushroom Science Recent Development11.9 Planetary Herbals 11.9.1 Planetary Herbals Corporation Information 11.9.2 Planetary Herbals Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.9.3 Planetary Herbals Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.9.4 Planetary Herbals Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.9.5 Planetary Herbals Recent Development11.1 Natures Way Reishi 11.1.1 Natures Way Reishi Corporation Information 11.1.2 Natures Way Reishi Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.1.3 Natures Way Reishi Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.1.4 Natures Way Reishi Reishi Mushroom Supplements Products Offered 11.1.5 Natures Way Reishi Recent Development 12 Future Forecast by Regions (Countries) (2021-2026)12.1 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Estimates and Projections by Region 12.1.1 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast by Regions 2021-2026 12.1.2 Global Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast by Regions 2021-202612.2 North America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.2.1 North America: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.2.2 North America: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.2.3 North America: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026)12.3 Europe Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.3.1 Europe: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.3.2 Europe: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.3.3 Europe: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026)12.4 Asia Pacific Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.4.1 Asia Pacific: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.4.2 Asia Pacific: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.4.3 Asia Pacific: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Region (2021-2026)12.5 Latin America Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.5.1 Latin America: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.5.2 Latin America: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.5.3 Latin America: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026)12.6 Middle East and Africa Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.6.1 Middle East and Africa: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.6.2 Middle East and Africa: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.6.3 Middle East and Africa: Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026) 13 Market Opportunities, Challenges, Risks and Influences Factors Analysis13.1 Market Opportunities and Drivers13.2 Market Challenges13.3 Market Risks/Restraints13.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis13.5 Primary Interviews with Key Reishi Mushroom Supplements Players (Opinion Leaders) 14 Value Chain and Sales Channels Analysis14.1 Value Chain Analysis14.2 Reishi Mushroom Supplements Customers14.3 Sales Channels Analysis 14.3.1 Sales Channels 14.3.2 Distributors 15 Research Findings and Conclusion 16 Appendix16.1 Research Methodology 16.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach 16.1.2 Data Source16.2 Author Details

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become the brand of quality assurance in consulting industry.

Here is the original post:
Reishi Mushroom Supplements Market 2020- Analysis And In-Depth Research On Market Size, Trends, Emerging Growth Factors And Forecast To 2026 - Weekly...

The airborne retrofit & modernization (R&M) market is as vast as it is complex. With most aircraft expected to serve their operators for a span of at least 30 years, each produced airframe brings with it not only the initial cost of procurement, but a three-decades-long litany of modifications, retrofits, and Service Life Extension Programs that in some cases may surpass the initial cost of purchase. Forecast Internationals Airborne Retrofit & Modernization Forecast provides clients with an in-depth analysis of ongoing and future retrofit programs for more than 60 key aircraft operated around the globe. With the release of the Airborne Retrofit & Modernization module for Platinum Forecast System 4.4, clients can, for the first time, access the data used to generate our program reports in its entirety.

With the Platinum Forecast System, our data is sortable, customizable, and plentiful. Through years of research, our analysts have identified, analyzed, and reported on significant ongoing and speculative retrofit & modernization programs on aircraft like the Airbus A320, Lockheed Martin C-130H and more, building a library of hard data that is now available for manipulation by our clients.

A subscription to the Airborne Retrofit & Modernization module for Platinum provides not only access to our R&M-related data, but the full roster of individual platform reports and an R&M-tailored news feed, which is updated daily. Through Platinum, our clients can sort by data field, including Date Range, Platform Category, System Data Type, Category of Use and Worldwide Geography, among others, and have access to unprecedented detail, including graphics and tables/spreadsheets with computations of units/values over a 15-year forecast period. With the Airborne Retrofit & Modernization module for Platinum Forecast System 4.4, you can identify competitors in a given segment, highlight key operator nations and prime retrofit candidates within each fleet, and take advantage of opportunities as they arise.

In the weeks and months ahead, accurate and reliable market forecasts will be more critical than ever to achieving success. At this moment of global uncertainty, Forecast International is committed to ensuring you have the market intelligence you need to navigate the challenging road forward.

Read more:
Bring the Global Airborne Retrofit & Modernization Market into View - Defense & Security Monitor

The market research report published by QYResearch is a brilliant, complete, and much-needed resource for companies, stakeholders, and investors interested in the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market. It informs readers about key trends and opportunities in the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market along with critical market dynamics expected to impact the global market growth. It offers a range of market analysis studies, including production and consumption, sales, industry value chain, competitive landscape, regional growth, and price. On the whole, it comes out as an intelligent resource that companies can use to gain a competitive advantage in the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market.

Key companies operating in the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market include , Life Extension, Pharmavite, NOW Foods, Source Naturals, BY-HEALTH, GNC, Centrum, Jamieson Vitamins, Nutraceutical Corporation, Haviland Enterprises Inc., Pharma Resources International LLC, AIE Pharmaceuticals, Gemini Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp., Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc., Van Wankum Ingredients, Action Labs Inc., Softgel Nutraceuticals, Norquay Technology Inc., Arnet Pharmaceutical, Twinlab Corp., Superior Supplement Manufacturing, The Chemical Co. Melatonine

Get PDF Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) :

https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1711659/covid-19-impact-on-global-melatonine-market

Segmental Analysis

Both developed and emerging regions are deeply studied by the authors of the report. The regional analysis section of the report offers a comprehensive analysis of the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market on the basis of region. Each region is exhaustively researched about so that players can use the analysis to tap into unexplored markets and plan powerful strategies to gain a foothold in lucrative markets.

Global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine Market Segment By Type:

, Capsule, Pills, Liquid Melatonine

Global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine Market Segment By Application:

, Hospital, Clinic, Household, Other

Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis is one of the best sections of the report that compares the progress of leading players based on crucial parameters, including market share, new developments, global reach, local competition, price, and production. From the nature of competition to future changes in the vendor landscape, the report provides in-depth analysis of the competition in the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market.

Key companies operating in the global COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine market include , Life Extension, Pharmavite, NOW Foods, Source Naturals, BY-HEALTH, GNC, Centrum, Jamieson Vitamins, Nutraceutical Corporation, Haviland Enterprises Inc., Pharma Resources International LLC, AIE Pharmaceuticals, Gemini Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp., Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc., Van Wankum Ingredients, Action Labs Inc., Softgel Nutraceuticals, Norquay Technology Inc., Arnet Pharmaceutical, Twinlab Corp., Superior Supplement Manufacturing, The Chemical Co. Melatonine

Key questions answered in the report:

For Discount, Customization in the Report: https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1711659/covid-19-impact-on-global-melatonine-market

TOC

1 Study Coverage1.1 Melatonine Product Introduction1.2 Market Segments1.3 Key Melatonine Manufacturers Covered: Ranking by Revenue1.4 Market by Type 1.4.1 Global Melatonine Market Size Growth Rate by Type 1.4.2 Capsule 1.4.3 Pills 1.4.4 Liquid1.5 Market by Application 1.5.1 Global Melatonine Market Size Growth Rate by Application 1.5.2 Hospital 1.5.3 Clinic 1.5.4 Household 1.5.5 Other1.6 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Melatonine Industry Impact 1.6.1 How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Melatonine Industry 1.6.1.1 Melatonine Business Impact Assessment Covid-19 1.6.1.2 Supply Chain Challenges 1.6.1.3 COVID-19s Impact On Crude Oil and Refined Products 1.6.2 Market Trends and Melatonine Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape 1.6.3 Measures / Proposal against Covid-19 1.6.3.1 Government Measures to Combat Covid-19 Impact 1.6.3.2 Proposal for Melatonine Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact1.7 Study Objectives1.8 Years Considered 2 Executive Summary2.1 Global Melatonine Market Size Estimates and Forecasts 2.1.1 Global Melatonine Revenue 2015-2026 2.1.2 Global Melatonine Sales 2015-20262.2 Melatonine Market Size by Region: 2020 Versus 2026 2.2.1 Global Melatonine Retrospective Market Scenario in Sales by Region: 2015-2020 2.2.2 Global Melatonine Retrospective Market Scenario in Revenue by Region: 2015-2020 3 Global Melatonine Competitor Landscape by Players3.1 Melatonine Sales by Manufacturers 3.1.1 Melatonine Sales by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 3.1.2 Melatonine Sales Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)3.2 Melatonine Revenue by Manufacturers 3.2.1 Melatonine Revenue by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 3.2.2 Melatonine Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020) 3.2.3 Global Melatonine Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI) (2015-2020) 3.2.4 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Melatonine Revenue in 2019 3.2.5 Global Melatonine Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)3.3 Melatonine Price by Manufacturers3.4 Melatonine Manufacturing Base Distribution, Product Types 3.4.1 Melatonine Manufacturers Manufacturing Base Distribution, Headquarters 3.4.2 Manufacturers Melatonine Product Type 3.4.3 Date of International Manufacturers Enter into Melatonine Market3.5 Manufacturers Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 4 Breakdown Data by Type (2015-2026)4.1 Global Melatonine Market Size by Type (2015-2020) 4.1.1 Global Melatonine Sales by Type (2015-2020) 4.1.2 Global Melatonine Revenue by Type (2015-2020) 4.1.3 Melatonine Average Selling Price (ASP) by Type (2015-2026)4.2 Global Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 4.2.1 Global Melatonine Sales Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 4.2.2 Global Melatonine Revenue Forecast by Type (2021-2026) 4.2.3 Melatonine Average Selling Price (ASP) Forecast by Type (2021-2026)4.3 Global Melatonine Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End 5 Breakdown Data by Application (2015-2026)5.1 Global Melatonine Market Size by Application (2015-2020) 5.1.1 Global Melatonine Sales by Application (2015-2020) 5.1.2 Global Melatonine Revenue by Application (2015-2020) 5.1.3 Melatonine Price by Application (2015-2020)5.2 Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 5.2.1 Global Melatonine Sales Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 5.2.2 Global Melatonine Revenue Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 5.2.3 Global Melatonine Price Forecast by Application (2021-2026) 6 North America6.1 North America Melatonine by Country 6.1.1 North America Melatonine Sales by Country 6.1.2 North America Melatonine Revenue by Country 6.1.3 U.S. 6.1.4 Canada6.2 North America Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Type6.3 North America Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Application 7 Europe7.1 Europe Melatonine by Country 7.1.1 Europe Melatonine Sales by Country 7.1.2 Europe Melatonine Revenue by Country 7.1.3 Germany 7.1.4 France 7.1.5 U.K. 7.1.6 Italy 7.1.7 Russia7.2 Europe Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Type7.3 Europe Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Application 8 Asia Pacific8.1 Asia Pacific Melatonine by Region 8.1.1 Asia Pacific Melatonine Sales by Region 8.1.2 Asia Pacific Melatonine Revenue by Region 8.1.3 China 8.1.4 Japan 8.1.5 South Korea 8.1.6 India 8.1.7 Australia 8.1.8 Taiwan 8.1.9 Indonesia 8.1.10 Thailand 8.1.11 Malaysia 8.1.12 Philippines 8.1.13 Vietnam8.2 Asia Pacific Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Type8.3 Asia Pacific Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Application 9 Latin America9.1 Latin America Melatonine by Country 9.1.1 Latin America Melatonine Sales by Country 9.1.2 Latin America Melatonine Revenue by Country 9.1.3 Mexico 9.1.4 Brazil 9.1.5 Argentina9.2 Central & South America Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Type9.3 Central & South America Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Application 10 Middle East and Africa10.1 Middle East and Africa Melatonine by Country 10.1.1 Middle East and Africa Melatonine Sales by Country 10.1.2 Middle East and Africa Melatonine Revenue by Country 10.1.3 Turkey 10.1.4 Saudi Arabia 10.1.5 UAE10.2 Middle East and Africa Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Type10.3 Middle East and Africa Melatonine Market Facts & Figures by Application 11 Company Profiles11.1 Life Extension 11.1.1 Life Extension Corporation Information 11.1.2 Life Extension Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.1.3 Life Extension Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.1.4 Life Extension Melatonine Products Offered 11.1.5 Life Extension Recent Development11.2 Pharmavite 11.2.1 Pharmavite Corporation Information 11.2.2 Pharmavite Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.2.3 Pharmavite Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.2.4 Pharmavite Melatonine Products Offered 11.2.5 Pharmavite Recent Development11.3 NOW Foods 11.3.1 NOW Foods Corporation Information 11.3.2 NOW Foods Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.3.3 NOW Foods Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.3.4 NOW Foods Melatonine Products Offered 11.3.5 NOW Foods Recent Development11.4 Source Naturals 11.4.1 Source Naturals Corporation Information 11.4.2 Source Naturals Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.4.3 Source Naturals Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.4.4 Source Naturals Melatonine Products Offered 11.4.5 Source Naturals Recent Development11.5 BY-HEALTH 11.5.1 BY-HEALTH Corporation Information 11.5.2 BY-HEALTH Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.5.3 BY-HEALTH Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.5.4 BY-HEALTH Melatonine Products Offered 11.5.5 BY-HEALTH Recent Development11.6 GNC 11.6.1 GNC Corporation Information 11.6.2 GNC Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.6.3 GNC Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.6.4 GNC Melatonine Products Offered 11.6.5 GNC Recent Development11.7 Centrum 11.7.1 Centrum Corporation Information 11.7.2 Centrum Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.7.3 Centrum Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.7.4 Centrum Melatonine Products Offered 11.7.5 Centrum Recent Development11.8 Jamieson Vitamins 11.8.1 Jamieson Vitamins Corporation Information 11.8.2 Jamieson Vitamins Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.8.3 Jamieson Vitamins Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.8.4 Jamieson Vitamins Melatonine Products Offered 11.8.5 Jamieson Vitamins Recent Development11.9 Nutraceutical Corporation 11.9.1 Nutraceutical Corporation Corporation Information 11.9.2 Nutraceutical Corporation Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.9.3 Nutraceutical Corporation Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.9.4 Nutraceutical Corporation Melatonine Products Offered 11.9.5 Nutraceutical Corporation Recent Development11.10 Haviland Enterprises Inc. 11.10.1 Haviland Enterprises Inc. Corporation Information 11.10.2 Haviland Enterprises Inc. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.10.3 Haviland Enterprises Inc. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.10.4 Haviland Enterprises Inc. Melatonine Products Offered 11.10.5 Haviland Enterprises Inc. Recent Development11.1 Life Extension 11.1.1 Life Extension Corporation Information 11.1.2 Life Extension Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.1.3 Life Extension Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.1.4 Life Extension Melatonine Products Offered 11.1.5 Life Extension Recent Development11.12 AIE Pharmaceuticals 11.12.1 AIE Pharmaceuticals Corporation Information 11.12.2 AIE Pharmaceuticals Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.12.3 AIE Pharmaceuticals Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.12.4 AIE Pharmaceuticals Products Offered 11.12.5 AIE Pharmaceuticals Recent Development11.13 Gemini Pharmaceuticals 11.13.1 Gemini Pharmaceuticals Corporation Information 11.13.2 Gemini Pharmaceuticals Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.13.3 Gemini Pharmaceuticals Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.13.4 Gemini Pharmaceuticals Products Offered 11.13.5 Gemini Pharmaceuticals Recent Development11.14 Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp. 11.14.1 Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp. Corporation Information 11.14.2 Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.14.3 Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.14.4 Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp. Products Offered 11.14.5 Spectrum Chemical Mfg. Corp. Recent Development11.15 Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc. 11.15.1 Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc. Corporation Information 11.15.2 Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.15.3 Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.15.4 Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc. Products Offered 11.15.5 Nutritional Supplement Manufacturers Inc. Recent Development11.16 Van Wankum Ingredients 11.16.1 Van Wankum Ingredients Corporation Information 11.16.2 Van Wankum Ingredients Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.16.3 Van Wankum Ingredients Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.16.4 Van Wankum Ingredients Products Offered 11.16.5 Van Wankum Ingredients Recent Development11.17 Action Labs Inc. 11.17.1 Action Labs Inc. Corporation Information 11.17.2 Action Labs Inc. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.17.3 Action Labs Inc. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.17.4 Action Labs Inc. Products Offered 11.17.5 Action Labs Inc. Recent Development11.18 Softgel Nutraceuticals 11.18.1 Softgel Nutraceuticals Corporation Information 11.18.2 Softgel Nutraceuticals Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.18.3 Softgel Nutraceuticals Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.18.4 Softgel Nutraceuticals Products Offered 11.18.5 Softgel Nutraceuticals Recent Development11.19 Norquay Technology Inc. 11.19.1 Norquay Technology Inc. Corporation Information 11.19.2 Norquay Technology Inc. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.19.3 Norquay Technology Inc. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.19.4 Norquay Technology Inc. Products Offered 11.19.5 Norquay Technology Inc. Recent Development11.20 Arnet Pharmaceutical 11.20.1 Arnet Pharmaceutical Corporation Information 11.20.2 Arnet Pharmaceutical Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.20.3 Arnet Pharmaceutical Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.20.4 Arnet Pharmaceutical Products Offered 11.20.5 Arnet Pharmaceutical Recent Development11.21 Twinlab Corp. 11.21.1 Twinlab Corp. Corporation Information 11.21.2 Twinlab Corp. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.21.3 Twinlab Corp. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.21.4 Twinlab Corp. Products Offered 11.21.5 Twinlab Corp. Recent Development11.22 Superior Supplement Manufacturing 11.22.1 Superior Supplement Manufacturing Corporation Information 11.22.2 Superior Supplement Manufacturing Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.22.3 Superior Supplement Manufacturing Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.22.4 Superior Supplement Manufacturing Products Offered 11.22.5 Superior Supplement Manufacturing Recent Development11.23 The Chemical Co. 11.23.1 The Chemical Co. Corporation Information 11.23.2 The Chemical Co. Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue 11.23.3 The Chemical Co. Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020) 11.23.4 The Chemical Co. Products Offered 11.23.5 The Chemical Co. Recent Development 12 Future Forecast by Regions (Countries) (2021-2026)12.1 Melatonine Market Estimates and Projections by Region 12.1.1 Global Melatonine Sales Forecast by Regions 2021-2026 12.1.2 Global Melatonine Revenue Forecast by Regions 2021-202612.2 North America Melatonine Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.2.1 North America: Melatonine Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.2.2 North America: Melatonine Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.2.3 North America: Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026)12.3 Europe Melatonine Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.3.1 Europe: Melatonine Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.3.2 Europe: Melatonine Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.3.3 Europe: Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026)12.4 Asia Pacific Melatonine Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.4.1 Asia Pacific: Melatonine Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.4.2 Asia Pacific: Melatonine Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.4.3 Asia Pacific: Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Region (2021-2026)12.5 Latin America Melatonine Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.5.1 Latin America: Melatonine Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.5.2 Latin America: Melatonine Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.5.3 Latin America: Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026)12.6 Middle East and Africa Melatonine Market Size Forecast (2021-2026) 12.6.1 Middle East and Africa: Melatonine Sales Forecast (2021-2026) 12.6.2 Middle East and Africa: Melatonine Revenue Forecast (2021-2026) 12.6.3 Middle East and Africa: Melatonine Market Size Forecast by Country (2021-2026) 13 Market Opportunities, Challenges, Risks and Influences Factors Analysis13.1 Market Opportunities and Drivers13.2 Market Challenges13.3 Market Risks/Restraints13.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis13.5 Primary Interviews with Key Melatonine Players (Opinion Leaders) 14 Value Chain and Sales Channels Analysis14.1 Value Chain Analysis14.2 Melatonine Customers14.3 Sales Channels Analysis 14.3.1 Sales Channels 14.3.2 Distributors 15 Research Findings and Conclusion 16 Appendix16.1 Research Methodology 16.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach 16.1.2 Data Source16.2 Author Details16.3 Disclaimer

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become the brand of quality assurance in consulting industry.

See more here:
COVID-19 Impact on Melatonine Market Research Report: Probable Key Development To Be Observed Market States And Outlook Across By 2026 - News Distinct

The S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market an off-the-shelf research report for the year 2020-2026 has been recently added by Market Insights Reports to get an in-depth analysis of different attributes of industries and providing timely access to accurate, reliable and unbiased analysis of the market. The data provided related to the Market Size in value and volume*, top market segments driving sales and revenue, top companies, the share of the market in the market and the top countries which account for the maximum production and consumption.

The major manufacturers covered in this report:

Doctors Best, NutraLife, Jarrow Formulas, Now Foods, Life Extension, Source Naturals, California Gold Nutrition, Metabolic Maintenanc, and Others.

We aimed to provide most segmented consumption and sales data of different types of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e), downstream consumption fields and competitive landscape in different regions and countries around the world, this report analyzes the latest market data from the primary and secondary authoritative source.

Types Of Global S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market is Segmented as Follows:

Chemical Synthesis

Fermentation

Enzymatic Conversion

and others.

Sample PDF Copy of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market 2019 :

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/06022058996/covid-19-impact-on-global-s-adenosylmethionine-sam-e-market-insights-forecast-to-2026/inquiry?mode=MH82

Application Of Global S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market is Segmented as Follows:

Scientific Research

Clinical Treatment

Others

and others.

We aim to deliver a high quality report with a relatively low cost thus delivering a optimum ROI and helping those involved in making informed, analytically driven decisions. Each of our reports has a database that has been researched and honed for the past 5 to 7 years, Along with this secondary sources referred to and studied include press releases, financial statements, analyst reports and other paid sources.

Special Offer: Avail Up to 20% Discount On S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Report:

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/06022058996/covid-19-impact-on-global-s-adenosylmethionine-sam-e-market-insights-forecast-to-2026/discount?mode=MH82

Geographical Regional Analysis :

The research mainly covers S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) market in

-North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)

-Europe industry (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy)

-Asia-Pacific (Southeast Asia, China, Korea, India and Japan)

-South America industry (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia)

-Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

Important Features that are under Offering and Key Highlights of the Reports:

-Detailed overview of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market

-Changing market dynamics of the industry

-In-depth market segmentation by Type, Application etc.

-Historical, current and projected market size in terms of volume and value

-Recent industry trends and developments

-Competitive landscape of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Plant Market

-Strategies of key players and product offerings

-Potential and niche segments/regions exhibiting promising growth

This data is provided from 2014 to 2019 in actual and has been forecasted from 2020 to 2025 keeping in mind the current market trends, micro and macroeconomic factors and other legal and environmental factors affecting the market.

Buy complete S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market report at :

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/06022058996/covid-19-impact-on-global-s-adenosylmethionine-sam-e-market-insights-forecast-to-2026?mode=MH82

We also offer customization on reports based on specific client requirement:

1- Country level analysis for any 5 countries of your choice.

2- Competitive analysis of any 5 key market players.

3- 40 analyst hours to cover any other data points

Contact Us:

Irfan Tamboli (Head of Sales) Market Insights ReportPhone: + 1704 266 3234 | +91-750-707-8687sales@marketinsightsreports.com | irfan@marketinsightsreports.com

See original here:
S-adenosylmethionine (SAM-e) Market Production, Revenue And Status forecast 2020 to 2026 - News Collective

WASHINGTON In the coming years, the U.S. Navy will be faced with a decision that will radically shape the carrier air wing: Is the service willing to sacrifice dozens of new Super Hornet jets for the promise of a sixth-generation fighter in the 2030s?

The Navy is opting to buy a final 24 F/A-18E/Fs in fiscal 2021, slashing a planned purchase of at least 36 Super Hornets that would have spanned FY22 through FY24. The move will save $4.5 billion, which the service plans to redirect to its sixth-generation fighter program, known as Next Generation Air Dominance, or F/A-XX.

However, the decision may not be as clear cut or final as budget documents make it seem.

The Navy is at the very start of the NGAD development process, having completed an analysis of alternatives in June 2019, as well as broad requirements and guidance for a concept of operations. The effort is now in the concept development phase, during which defense companies explore ideas that balance advanced air dominance capabilities and long-term affordability/sustainment, said Navy spokesman Capt. Danny Hernandez.

But with an economic downturn potentially leading to even more pressure on the defense budget, the Navy may not have the funds to proceed with NGAD as a clean-sheet fighter jet.

Although the Navy would like to start developing the next generation of aircraft ... I just dont think and increasingly people in the department are thinking theres not going to be the money to devote to this next generation of fighter, said Bryan Clark, an analyst with the Hudson Institute and a retired naval officer.

I think they are going to fall back to looking at F/A-XX as a modification or an evolution of the F-35, he said. Instead of the other half of the air wing being some new aircraft, youll have a combination of F-35Cs and then some modified version of the F-35 or a modified Super Hornet."

Sign up for our Early Bird Brief Get the defense industry's most comprehensive news and information straight to your inbox

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Early Bird Brief.

Jerry Hendrix, a retired Navy captain and an analyst with the Telemus Group, said the services enthusiasm for F/A-XX is a sign of a continued preference for manned aviation as well as a desire to shut out any hope of fielding a long-range, penetrating strike drone.

Ive always been in favor of extending the Hornet production line because it is solid and stable, Hendrix said. But the extension was based on the proviso that were extending in order to get to an unmanned combat aerial vehicle. If it was an extension to get to the next manned fighter were missing the idea of what the future competitive environment, or really the present competitive environment, is all about.

The Navy has grappled in prior years with the question of whether to cease production of the Super Hornet in favor of a future fighter, and it is an argument that lawmakers are wary of.

The Navy first planned to stop buying the F/A-18 in its FY15 budget a decision made to fund the transition to the F-35. But technical issues and delays pushed out the fielding of the Navys F-35C takeoff-and-landing model for aircraft carriers to 2018, leaving the service dependent on a fleet of aging, battle-worn F/A-18s in need of a service-life extension. The Navy ended up listing the F/A-18 on its unfunded priorities list, and Congress followed by funding enough Super Hornets to keep Boeings line running.

If we go back a few years and we look at what happened when we thought we were going to plant the F-35, we let the F-18 slide down, Rep. Donald Norcross, D-N.J., said in a March 10 hearing. Norcross is the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces.

The process of standing up the F-35C was much slower than expected, and the Navy ended up buying additional F/A-18s to bridge the capability gap, he said. Yet, here we are getting ready to curtail 36 Super Hornets because we are expecting, you know, the F/A-XX to come online, he added.

Asked how he could be confident that F/A-XX would stay on schedule, Rear Adm. Gregory Harris, the Navys director of air warfare, said he could provide lawmakers a more detailed defense of the Navys Next Generation Air Dominance family of systems in a classified setting.

Were working closely with the Air Force to ensure the systems that we put on that have the [technology readiness level] that gives us confidence that we can achieve that aircraft on time in the early 2030s to replace the F/A-18E/F as it reaches the end of its service life, Harris said.

Missouri Rep. Vicky Hartzler, the subcommittees top Republican, pointed out that the Navy already has a fighter shortfall of about 49 aircraft, with additional F/A-18s being pulled from the operational fleet into a service-life extension period that will take at least a year.

I feel like this is too much operational risk, she said. If you add all those up, this is a severe shortage that we are experiencing, and if you dont account for the attrition rate, actually in combat we would have a very large gap there potentially.

James Geurts, the Navys assistant secretary for research, development and acquisition, said there is always risk when transitioning from legacy to new aircraft, but that improved mission-capable rates and a steady flow of jets moving through upgrades will help balance the shortfall.

Were taking risk until the late 2020s. I think 2029 is when we will get to the full fighter inventory, and so we had to take some risk as we balance that, he said.

The most likely scenario is that, as the Navy presses forward with its plan to curtail funding for F/A-18s, Congress will simply continue buying more of them, Hendrix said.

But one unanswered question is whether lawmakers will also intervene to force the Navy to consider a wider range of aviation options that could give the carrier air wing longer legs.

Im hopeful that there will be a broader conversation, led by Congress and the administration, perhaps together, to say: We are looking at the future security environment. We are looking at the Chinese threat. We are looking at whats happening in Taiwan, whats happening [in] Hong Kong and within the first island chain, and we really need to have this new capability of long-range, penetrating strike, Hendrix said.

What I do realize is that because the Navy is very conservative right now in how its approaching its procurement programs, the Navy will not be the one to say we need this mission.

No matter what the Navy decides, it could impact its procurement of the MQ-25 unmanned tanker drone currently under development by Boeing. Hendrix sees the MQ-25 program as a likely bill payer, particularly if the service continues to buy Hornets.

What was the reason for the MQ-25? It was to take the strain off from the Hornets, which were being used to refuel other F/A-18s and burning through their service lives faster than anticipated, Hendrix said. When you reopen the Hornet production line and you add 120-something new Hornets, you actually took that strain off the Hornet fleet. So there really isnt a requirement now for a recovery tanker.

Clark agrees that the Navy should develop a long-range unmanned combat aircraft but is unlikely to do so.

But should the Navy choose not to proceed with an F/A-XX program, Clark believes the service could funnel some of that money into modifying the MQ-25 to supplement strike, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capacities, and could even end buy more MQ-25s than planned.

The MQ-25 program, once it gets fielded and proven out, I could see the Navy expanding it, he said. I think the operational and programmatic pressures have driven the Navy to embrace the MQ-25, and because its a complement to the manned aircraft, its generated less resentment among the manned aviation community.

See the original post here:
At a budgetary crossroads, the US Navy's aviation wing must choose between old and new - DefenseNews.com

CMI published a business research report on Eye Health Supplements Market: Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecasts 20202026. Eye Health Supplements Market with 150+ market data Tables, Pie Chat, Graphs & Figures spread through Pages and easy to understand detailed analysis. The information is gathered based on modern floats and requests identified with the administrations and items.

The global Eye Health Supplements Market analysis further provides pioneering landscape of market along with market augmentation history and key development involved in the industry. The report also features comprehensive research study for high growth potential industries professional survey with market analysis. Eye Health Supplements Market report helps the companies to understand the market trends and future market prospective,opportunities and articulate the critical business strategies.

We do provide Sample of this report, Please go through the following information in order to request Sample Copy

This Report Sample Includes

Receive Sample of Research Report @ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-sample/3791

Geographical segmentation of Eye Health Supplements Market involves the regional outlook which further covers United States, China, Europe, Japan, Southeast Asia and Middle East & Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application.

Eye Health Supplements Market: Competitive Landscape

Leading players operating in the global Eye Health Supplements Market include:Bausch + Lomb, Vitabiotics Ltd., Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc., Life Extension, Pfizer Inc., OmniActive Health Technologies, Algatechnologies, Alliance Pharma, The Natures Bounty Co., Novartis AG, and Amway Corp.

Scope of the Report

The key features of the Eye Health Supplements Market report 2019-2026 are the organization, extensive amount of analysis and data from previous and current years as well as forecast data for the next five years. Most of the report is made up from tables, charts and figures that give our clients a clear picture of the Eye Health Supplements Market. The structure of Eye Health Supplements Market by identifying its various segments and sub-segments to help understanding the report.

Eye Health Supplements Market Research Report gives current competitive analysis and also valuable insights to clients/industries, which will assist them to prepare a new strategy to expand or penetrate in a global Eye Health Supplements Market.

As the report proceeds further, it covers the analysis of key market participants paired with development plans and policies, production techniques, price structure of the Eye Health Supplements Market. The report also identifies the other essential elements such as product overview, supply chain relationship, raw material supply and demand statistics, expected developments, profit and consumption ratio.

The PDF Research only provides Table of Contents (ToC), scope of the report and research framework of the report.

Request PDF Research Report Brochure @ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-pdf/3791

Important Eye Health Supplements Market Data Available In This Report:

Note: Request Discount option enables you to get the discounts on the actual price of the report. Kindly fill the form, and one of our consultants would get in touch with you to discuss your allocated budget, and would provide discounts.

Use QUARANTINEDAYS Code In Precise Requirement And Get FLAT $1,000 OFF On This Reports

Ask For Discount Before Purchasing This Business Report : https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-discount/3791

About Coherent Market Insights:

Coherent Market Insights is a prominent market research and consulting firm offering action-ready syndicated research reports, custom market analysis, consulting services, and competitive analysis through various recommendations related to emerging market trends, technologies, and potential absolute dollar opportunity.

Contact Us:

Mr. Shah

Coherent Market Insights

1001 4th Ave,

#3200

Seattle, WA 98154

Tel: +1-206-701-6702

Email:[emailprotected]

For More Related Reports:http://bit.ly/Rajkumar123

Read this article:
Eye Health Supplements Market 2020 Growth by Opportunities, Application, Driver, Current Trends and Forecast by 2026 - Cole of Duty

Los Angeles, United State: Complete study of the global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, market is carried out by the analysts in this report, taking into consideration key factors like drivers, challenges, recent trends, opportunities, advancements, and competitive landscape. This report offers a clear understanding of the present as well as future scenario of the global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, industry. Research techniques like PESTLE and Porters Five Forces analysis have been deployed by the researchers. They have also provided accurate data on Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, production, capacity, price, cost, margin, and revenue to help the players gain a clear understanding into the overall existing and future market situation.

The research study includes great insights about critical market dynamics, including drivers, restraints, trends, and opportunities. It also includes various types of market analysis such as competitive analysis, manufacturing cost analysis, manufacturing process analysis, price analysis, and analysis of market influence factors. It is a complete study on the global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, market that can be used as a set of effective guidelines for ensuring strong growth in the coming years. It caters to all types of interested parties, viz. stakeholders, market participants, investors, market researchers, and other individuals associated with the Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, business.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart)https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1702900/impact-of-covid-19-outbreak-on-milk-thistle-health-tonic-global-market

It is important for every market participant to be familiar with the competitive scenario in the global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, industry. In order to fulfil the requirements, the industry analysts have evaluated the strategic activities of the competitors to help the key players strengthen their foothold in the market and increase their competitiveness.

Key Players Mentioned in the Global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, Market Research Report: Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost 200 countries around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the Milk Thistle Health Tonic market in 2020. COVID-19 can affect the global economy in three main ways: by directly affecting production and demand, by creating supply chain and market disruption, and by its financial impact on firms and financial markets. The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor events restricted; over forty countries state of emergency declared; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market volatility; falling business confidence, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future. This report also analyses the impact of Coronavirus COVID-19 on the Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry. Prior to COVID-19, the global market for Milk Thistle Health Tonic was anticipated to grow from US$ XX million in 2020 to US$ XX million by 2026; it is expected to grow at a CAGR of xx% during 20212026, whereas post-COVID-19 scenario, the market for Milk Thistle Health Tonic is projected to grow from US$ XX million in 2020 (a change by ~XX% compared to market estimated for 2020 before the outbreak of COVID-19) to US$ XX billion by 2026; it is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during 20212026. QY Research has recently curated a research report titled, Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Research Report 2020. The report is structured on primary and secondary research methodologies that derive historic and forecast data. The global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market is growing remarkably fast and is likely to thrive in terms of volume and revenue during the forecast period. Readers can gain insight into the various opportunities and restraints shaping the market. The report demonstrates the progress and bends that will occur during the forecast period. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Drivers and Restrains The research report has incorporated the analysis of different factors that augment the markets growth. It constitutes trends, restraints, and drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. This section also provides the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the future. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of sales about the global market and also about each type from 2015 to 2026. This section mentions the volume of sales by region from 2015 to 2026. Pricing analysis is included in the report according to each type from the year 2015 to 2026, manufacturer from 2015 to 2020, region from 2015 to 2020, and global price from 2015 to 2026. A thorough evaluation of the restrains included in the report portrays the contrast to drivers and gives room for strategic planning. Factors that overshadow the market growth are pivotal as they can be understood to devise different bends for getting hold of the lucrative opportunities that are present in the ever-growing market. Additionally, insights into market experts opinions have been taken to understand the market better. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Segment Analysis The research report includes specific segments such as application and product type. Each type provides information about the sales during the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. The application segment also provides revenue by volume and sales during the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Regional Analysis The research report includes a detailed study of regions of North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa. The report has been curated after observing and studying various factors that determine regional growth such as economic, environmental, social, technological, and political status of the particular region. Analysts have studied the data of revenue, sales, and manufacturers of each region. This section analyses region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. These analyses will help the reader to understand the potential worth of investment in a particular region. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Competitive Landscape This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and sales by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019. Following are the segments covered by the report are:, Tablets, Capsules, Others By Application:, Dietary Supplement, Health Food Key Players: The Key manufacturers that are operating in the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market are:, Health Genesis, Pure Encapsulations, Regis, Solgar, Aksuvital, BEC, NC, Life Extension, Swisse, HerbsofGold Competitive Landscape The analysts have provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape of the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market with the company market structure and market share analysis of the top players. The innovative trends and developments, mergers and acquisitions, product portfolio, and new product innovation to provide a dashboard view of the market, ultimately providing the readers accurate measure of the current market developments, business strategies, and key financials.

Global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, Market Segmentation by Product:Since the COVID-19 virus outbreak in December 2019, the disease has spread to almost 200 countries around the globe with the World Health Organization declaring it a public health emergency. The global impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are already starting to be felt, and will significantly affect the Milk Thistle Health Tonic market in 2020. COVID-19 can affect the global economy in three main ways: by directly affecting production and demand, by creating supply chain and market disruption, and by its financial impact on firms and financial markets. The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought effects on many aspects, like flight cancellations; travel bans and quarantines; restaurants closed; all indoor events restricted; over forty countries state of emergency declared; massive slowing of the supply chain; stock market volatility; falling business confidence, growing panic among the population, and uncertainty about future. This report also analyses the impact of Coronavirus COVID-19 on the Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry. Prior to COVID-19, the global market for Milk Thistle Health Tonic was anticipated to grow from US$ XX million in 2020 to US$ XX million by 2026; it is expected to grow at a CAGR of xx% during 20212026, whereas post-COVID-19 scenario, the market for Milk Thistle Health Tonic is projected to grow from US$ XX million in 2020 (a change by ~XX% compared to market estimated for 2020 before the outbreak of COVID-19) to US$ XX billion by 2026; it is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during 20212026. QY Research has recently curated a research report titled, Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Research Report 2020. The report is structured on primary and secondary research methodologies that derive historic and forecast data. The global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market is growing remarkably fast and is likely to thrive in terms of volume and revenue during the forecast period. Readers can gain insight into the various opportunities and restraints shaping the market. The report demonstrates the progress and bends that will occur during the forecast period. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Drivers and Restrains The research report has incorporated the analysis of different factors that augment the markets growth. It constitutes trends, restraints, and drivers that transform the market in either a positive or negative manner. This section also provides the scope of different segments and applications that can potentially influence the market in the future. The detailed information is based on current trends and historic milestones. This section also provides an analysis of the volume of sales about the global market and also about each type from 2015 to 2026. This section mentions the volume of sales by region from 2015 to 2026. Pricing analysis is included in the report according to each type from the year 2015 to 2026, manufacturer from 2015 to 2020, region from 2015 to 2020, and global price from 2015 to 2026. A thorough evaluation of the restrains included in the report portrays the contrast to drivers and gives room for strategic planning. Factors that overshadow the market growth are pivotal as they can be understood to devise different bends for getting hold of the lucrative opportunities that are present in the ever-growing market. Additionally, insights into market experts opinions have been taken to understand the market better. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Segment Analysis The research report includes specific segments such as application and product type. Each type provides information about the sales during the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. The application segment also provides revenue by volume and sales during the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Regional Analysis The research report includes a detailed study of regions of North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa. The report has been curated after observing and studying various factors that determine regional growth such as economic, environmental, social, technological, and political status of the particular region. Analysts have studied the data of revenue, sales, and manufacturers of each region. This section analyses region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. These analyses will help the reader to understand the potential worth of investment in a particular region. Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market: Competitive Landscape This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and sales by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019. Following are the segments covered by the report are:, Tablets, Capsules, Others By Application:, Dietary Supplement, Health Food Key Players: The Key manufacturers that are operating in the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market are:, Health Genesis, Pure Encapsulations, Regis, Solgar, Aksuvital, BEC, NC, Life Extension, Swisse, HerbsofGold Competitive Landscape The analysts have provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape of the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market with the company market structure and market share analysis of the top players. The innovative trends and developments, mergers and acquisitions, product portfolio, and new product innovation to provide a dashboard view of the market, ultimately providing the readers accurate measure of the current market developments, business strategies, and key financials.

Global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, Market Segmentation by Application: Dietary Supplement, Health Food Key Players: The Key manufacturers that are operating in the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market are:, Health Genesis, Pure Encapsulations, Regis, Solgar, Aksuvital, BEC, NC, Life Extension, Swisse, HerbsofGold Competitive Landscape The analysts have provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape of the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market with the company market structure and market share analysis of the top players. The innovative trends and developments, mergers and acquisitions, product portfolio, and new product innovation to provide a dashboard view of the market, ultimately providing the readers accurate measure of the current market developments, business strategies, and key financials.

The report has classified the global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, industry into segments including product type and application. Every segment is evaluated based on growth rate and share. Besides, the analysts have studied the potential regions that may prove rewarding for the Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, manufcaturers in the coming years. The regional analysis includes reliable predictions on value and volume, thereby helping market players to gain deep insights into the overall Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, industry.

Additionally, the industry analysts have studied key regions including North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa, along with their respective countries. Here, they have given a clear-cut understanding of the present and future situations of the global Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, industry in key regions. This will help the key players to focus on the lucrative regional markets.

Key questions answered in the report:

Request for customization in Report:https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1702900/impact-of-covid-19-outbreak-on-milk-thistle-health-tonic-global-market

Table od Content

1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Overview1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Milk Thistle Health Tonic1.2 Covid-19 Implications on Milk Thistle Health Tonic Segment by Type1.2.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Growth Rate Comparison by Type (2021-2026)1.2.2 Tablets1.2.3 Capsules1.2.4 Others1.3 Covid-19 Implications on Milk Thistle Health Tonic Segment by Application1.3.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Comparison by Application: 2020 VS 20261.3.2 Dietary Supplement1.3.3 Health Food1.4 Covid-19 Implications on Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size Estimates and Forecasts1.4.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue 2015-20261.4.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales 2015-20261.4.3 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Region: 2020 Versus 20261.5 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Milk Thistle Health Tonic Industry Impact1.5.1 How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Milk Thistle Health Tonic Industry1.5.1.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Business Impact Assessment Covid-191.5.1.2 Supply Chain Challenges1.5.1.3 COVID-19s Impact On Crude Oil and Refined Products1.5.2 Market Trends and Milk Thistle Health Tonic Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape1.5.3 Measures / Proposal against Covid-191.5.3.1 Government Measures to Combat Covid-19 Impact1.5.3.2 Proposal for Milk Thistle Health Tonic Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact 2 Covid-19 Implications on Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Competition by Manufacturers2.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)2.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)2.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Average Price by Manufacturers (2015-2020)2.4 Manufacturers Milk Thistle Health Tonic Manufacturing Sites, Area Served, Product Type2.5 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Competitive Situation and Trends2.5.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Concentration Rate2.5.2 Global Top 5 and Top 10 Players Market Share by Revenue2.5.3 Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)2.6 Manufacturers Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans2.7 Primary Interviews with Key Milk Thistle Health Tonic Players (Opinion Leaders) 3 Covid-19 Implications on Milk Thistle Health Tonic Retrospective Market Scenario by Region3.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Retrospective Market Scenario in Sales by Region: 2015-20203.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Retrospective Market Scenario in Revenue by Region: 2015-20203.3 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Facts & Figures by Country3.3.1 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.3.2 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.3.3 U.S.3.3.4 Canada3.4 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Facts & Figures by Country3.4.1 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.4.2 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.4.3 Germany3.4.4 France3.4.5 U.K.3.4.6 Italy3.4.7 Russia3.5 Asia Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Facts & Figures by Region3.5.1 Asia Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Region3.5.2 Asia Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Region3.5.3 China3.5.4 Japan3.5.5 South Korea3.5.6 India3.5.7 Australia3.5.8 Taiwan3.5.9 Indonesia3.5.10 Thailand3.5.11 Malaysia3.5.12 Philippines3.5.13 Vietnam3.6 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Facts & Figures by Country3.6.1 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.6.2 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.6.3 Mexico3.6.3 Brazil3.6.3 Argentina3.7 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Facts & Figures by Country3.7.1 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.7.2 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Country3.7.3 Turkey3.7.4 Saudi Arabia3.7.5 U.A.E 4 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Historic Market Analysis by Type4.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Type (2015-2020)4.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Type (2015-2020)4.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Price Market Share by Type (2015-2020)4.4 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End 5 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Historic Market Analysis by Application5.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Application (2015-2020)5.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Application (2015-2020)5.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Price by Application (2015-2020) 6 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Milk Thistle Health Tonic Business6.1 Health Genesis6.1.1 Corporation Information6.1.2 Health Genesis Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.1.3 Health Genesis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.1.4 Health Genesis Products Offered6.1.5 Health Genesis Recent Development6.2 Pure Encapsulations6.2.1 Pure Encapsulations Corporation Information6.2.2 Pure Encapsulations Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.2.3 Pure Encapsulations Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.2.4 Pure Encapsulations Products Offered6.2.5 Pure Encapsulations Recent Development6.3 Regis6.3.1 Regis Corporation Information6.3.2 Regis Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.3.3 Regis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.3.4 Regis Products Offered6.3.5 Regis Recent Development6.4 Solgar6.4.1 Solgar Corporation Information6.4.2 Solgar Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.4.3 Solgar Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.4.4 Solgar Products Offered6.4.5 Solgar Recent Development6.5 Aksuvital6.5.1 Aksuvital Corporation Information6.5.2 Aksuvital Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.5.3 Aksuvital Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.5.4 Aksuvital Products Offered6.5.5 Aksuvital Recent Development6.6 BEC6.6.1 BEC Corporation Information6.6.2 BEC Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.6.3 BEC Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.6.4 BEC Products Offered6.6.5 BEC Recent Development6.7 NC6.6.1 NC Corporation Information6.6.2 NC Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.6.3 NC Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.4.4 NC Products Offered6.7.5 NC Recent Development6.8 Life Extension6.8.1 Life Extension Corporation Information6.8.2 Life Extension Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.8.3 Life Extension Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.8.4 Life Extension Products Offered6.8.5 Life Extension Recent Development6.9 Swisse6.9.1 Swisse Corporation Information6.9.2 Swisse Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.9.3 Swisse Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.9.4 Swisse Products Offered6.9.5 Swisse Recent Development6.10 HerbsofGold6.10.1 HerbsofGold Corporation Information6.10.2 HerbsofGold Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.10.3 HerbsofGold Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.10.4 HerbsofGold Products Offered6.10.5 HerbsofGold Recent Development 7 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Manufacturing Cost Analysis7.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Key Raw Materials Analysis7.1.1 Key Raw Materials7.1.2 Key Raw Materials Price Trend7.1.3 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials7.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure7.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Milk Thistle Health Tonic7.4 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Industrial Chain Analysis 8 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers8.1 Marketing Channel8.2 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Distributors List8.3 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Customers 9 Market Dynamics 9.1 Market Trends 9.2 Opportunities and Drivers 9.3 Challenges 9.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis 10 Global Market Forecast10.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Estimates and Projections by Type10.1.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Type (2021-2026)10.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Type (2021-2026)10.2 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Estimates and Projections by Application10.2.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application (2021-2026)10.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application (2021-2026)10.3 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Estimates and Projections by Region10.3.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Region (2021-2026)10.3.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Region (2021-2026)10.4 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.5 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.6 Asia Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.7 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.8 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 11 Research Finding and Conclusion 12 Methodology and Data Source 12.1 Methodology/Research Approach 12.1.1 Research Programs/Design 12.1.2 Market Size Estimation 12.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation 12.2 Data Source 12.2.1 Secondary Sources 12.2.2 Primary Sources 12.3 Author List 12.4 Disclaimer

About Us:

QY Research established in 2007, focus on custom research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, data base and seminar services. The company owned a large basic data base (such as National Bureau of statistics database, Customs import and export database, Industry Association Database etc), experts resources (included energy automotive chemical medical ICT consumer goods etc.

Read more:
Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Milk Thistle Health Tonic, Market Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2026 by Top Manufacturers, Instruments...

Los Angeles, United State: Complete study of the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market is carried out by the analysts in this report, taking into consideration key factors like drivers, challenges, recent trends, opportunities, advancements, and competitive landscape. This report offers a clear understanding of the present as well as future scenario of the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry. Research techniques like PESTLE and Porters Five Forces analysis have been deployed by the researchers. They have also provided accurate data on Milk Thistle Health Tonic production, capacity, price, cost, margin, and revenue to help the players gain a clear understanding into the overall existing and future market situation.

The research study includes great insights about critical market dynamics, including drivers, restraints, trends, and opportunities. It also includes various types of market analysis such as competitive analysis, manufacturing cost analysis, manufacturing process analysis, price analysis, and analysis of market influence factors. It is a complete study on the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic market that can be used as a set of effective guidelines for ensuring strong growth in the coming years. It caters to all types of interested parties, viz. stakeholders, market participants, investors, market researchers, and other individuals associated with the Milk Thistle Health Tonic business.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart)https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1703248/global-milk-thistle-health-tonic-market

It is important for every market participant to be familiar with the competitive scenario in the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry. In order to fulfil the requirements, the industry analysts have evaluated the strategic activities of the competitors to help the key players strengthen their foothold in the market and increase their competitiveness.

Key Players Mentioned in the Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Research Report: , Health Genesis, Pure Encapsulations, Regis, Solgar, Aksuvital, BEC, NC, Life Extension, Swisse, HerbsofGold

Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Segmentation by Product:, Tablets, Capsules, Others

Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Segmentation by Application: Dietary Supplement, Health Food Health Genesis, Pure Encapsulations, Regis, Solgar, Aksuvital, BEC, NC, Life Extension, Swisse, HerbsofGold

The report has classified the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry into segments including product type and application. Every segment is evaluated based on growth rate and share. Besides, the analysts have studied the potential regions that may prove rewarding for the Milk Thistle Health Tonic manufcaturers in the coming years. The regional analysis includes reliable predictions on value and volume, thereby helping market players to gain deep insights into the overall Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry.

Additionally, the industry analysts have studied key regions including North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa, along with their respective countries. Here, they have given a clear-cut understanding of the present and future situations of the global Milk Thistle Health Tonic industry in key regions. This will help the key players to focus on the lucrative regional markets.

Key questions answered in the report:

Request for customization in Report:https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1703248/global-milk-thistle-health-tonic-market

Table od Content

1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Overview1.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Product Overview1.2 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Segment by Type1.2.1 Tablets1.2.2 Capsules1.2.3 Others1.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Type (2015-2026)1.3.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size Overview by Type (2015-2026)1.3.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Historic Market Size Review by Type (2015-2020)1.3.2.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.3.2.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.3.2.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Average Selling Price (ASP) by Type (2015-2026)1.3.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size Forecast by Type (2021-2026)1.3.3.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share Breakdown by Application (2021-2026)1.3.3.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share Breakdown by Application (2021-2026)1.3.3.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Average Selling Price (ASP) by Application (2021-2026)1.4 Key Regions Market Size Segment by Type (2015-2020)1.4.1 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.4.2 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.4.3 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.4.4 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.4.5 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Breakdown by Type (2015-2026)1.5 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Milk Thistle Health Tonic Industry Impact1.5.1 How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Milk Thistle Health Tonic Industry1.5.1.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Business Impact Assessment Covid-191.5.1.2 Supply Chain Challenges1.5.1.3 COVID-19s Impact On Crude Oil and Refined Products1.5.2 Market Trends and Milk Thistle Health Tonic Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape1.5.3 Measures / Proposal against Covid-191.5.3.1 Government Measures to Combat Covid-19 Impact1.5.3.2 Proposal for Milk Thistle Health Tonic Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact 2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Competition by Company2.1 Global Top Players by Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales (2015-2020)2.2 Global Top Players by Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue (2015-2020)2.3 Global Top Players Milk Thistle Health Tonic Average Selling Price (ASP) (2015-2020)2.4 Global Top Manufacturers Milk Thistle Health Tonic Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area, Product Type2.5 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Competitive Situation and Trends2.5.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Concentration Rate (2015-2020)2.5.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest Manufacturers by Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales and Revenue in 20192.6 Global Top Manufacturers by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Milk Thistle Health Tonic as of 2019)2.7 Date of Key Manufacturers Enter into Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market2.8 Key Manufacturers Milk Thistle Health Tonic Product Offered2.9 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Status and Outlook by Region (2015-2026)3.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size and CAGR by Region: 2015 VS 2020 VS 20263.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size Market Share by Region (2015-2020)3.2.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Region (2015-2020)3.2.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Region (2015-2020)3.2.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)3.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size Market Share by Region (2021-2026)3.3.1 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Region (2021-2026)3.3.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Region (2021-2026)3.3.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2021-2026)3.4 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.4.1 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.4.2 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.5 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.5.1 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.5.2 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.6 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.6.1 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.6.2 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.7 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.7.1 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.7.2 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.8 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.8.1 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue YoY Growth (2015-2026)3.8.2 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales YoY Growth (2015-2026) 4 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application4.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Segment by Application4.1.1 Dietary Supplement4.1.2 Health Food4.2 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales by Application: 2015 VS 2020 VS 20264.3 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Historic Sales by Application (2015-2020)4.4 Global Milk Thistle Health Tonic Forecasted Sales by Application (2021-2026)4.5 Key Regions Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Application4.5.1 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application4.5.2 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application4.5.3 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application4.5.4 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application4.5.5 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic by Application 5 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Country (2015-2026)5.1 North America Market Size Market Share by Country (2015-2020)5.1.1 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2015-2020)5.1.2 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2015-2020)5.2 North America Market Size Market Share by Country (2021-2026)5.2.1 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2021-2026)5.2.2 North America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2021-2026)5.3 North America Market Size YoY Growth by Country5.3.1 U.S. Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)5.3.2 Canada Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 6 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Country (2015-2026)6.1 Europe Market Size Market Share by Country (2015-2020)6.1.1 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2015-2020)6.1.2 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2015-2020)6.2 Europe Market Size Market Share by Country (2021-2026)6.2.1 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2021-2026)6.2.2 Europe Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2021-2026)6.3 Europe Market Size YoY Growth by Country6.3.1 Germany Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)6.3.2 France Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)6.3.3 U.K. Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)6.3.4 Italy Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)6.3.5 Russia Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 7 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Country (2015-2026)7.1 Asia-Pacific Market Size Market Share by Country (2015-2020)7.1.1 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2015-2020)7.1.2 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2015-2020)7.2 Asia-Pacific Market Size Market Share by Country (2021-2026)7.2.1 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2021-2026)7.2.2 Asia-Pacific Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2021-2026)7.3 Asia-Pacific Market Size YoY Growth by Country7.3.1 China Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.2 Japan Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.3 South Korea Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.4 India Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.5 Australia Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.6 Taiwan Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.7 Indonesia Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.8 Thailand Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.9 Malaysia Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.10 Philippines Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)7.3.11 Vietnam Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 8 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Country (2015-2026)8.1 Latin America Market Size Market Share by Country (2015-2020)8.1.1 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2015-2020)8.1.2 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2015-2020)8.2 Latin America Market Size Market Share by Country (2021-2026)8.2.1 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2021-2026)8.2.2 Latin America Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2021-2026)8.3 Latin America Market Size YoY Growth by Country8.3.1 Mexico Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)8.3.2 Brazil Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)8.3.3 Argentina Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 9 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size by Country (2015-2026)9.1 Middle East and Africa Market Size Market Share by Country (2015-2020)9.1.1 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2015-2020)9.1.2 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2015-2020)9.2 Middle East and Africa Market Size Market Share by Country (2021-2026)9.2.1 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales Market Share by Country (2021-2026)9.2.2 Middle East and Africa Milk Thistle Health Tonic Revenue Market Share by Country (2021-2026)9.3 Middle East and Africa Market Size YoY Growth by Country9.3.1 Turkey Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)9.3.2 Saudi Arabia Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026)9.3.3 U.A.E Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2026) 10 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Milk Thistle Health Tonic Business10.1 Health Genesis10.1.1 Health Genesis Corporation Information10.1.2 Health Genesis Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.1.3 Health Genesis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.1.4 Health Genesis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.1.5 Health Genesis Recent Development10.2 Pure Encapsulations10.2.1 Pure Encapsulations Corporation Information10.2.2 Pure Encapsulations Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.2.3 Pure Encapsulations Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.2.4 Health Genesis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.2.5 Pure Encapsulations Recent Development10.3 Regis10.3.1 Regis Corporation Information10.3.2 Regis Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.3.3 Regis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.3.4 Regis Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.3.5 Regis Recent Development10.4 Solgar10.4.1 Solgar Corporation Information10.4.2 Solgar Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.4.3 Solgar Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.4.4 Solgar Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.4.5 Solgar Recent Development10.5 Aksuvital10.5.1 Aksuvital Corporation Information10.5.2 Aksuvital Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.5.3 Aksuvital Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.5.4 Aksuvital Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.5.5 Aksuvital Recent Development10.6 BEC10.6.1 BEC Corporation Information10.6.2 BEC Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.6.3 BEC Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.6.4 BEC Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.6.5 BEC Recent Development10.7 NC10.7.1 NC Corporation Information10.7.2 NC Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.7.3 NC Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.7.4 NC Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.7.5 NC Recent Development10.8 Life Extension10.8.1 Life Extension Corporation Information10.8.2 Life Extension Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.8.3 Life Extension Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.8.4 Life Extension Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.8.5 Life Extension Recent Development10.9 Swisse10.9.1 Swisse Corporation Information10.9.2 Swisse Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue10.9.3 Swisse Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.9.4 Swisse Milk Thistle Health Tonic Products Offered10.9.5 Swisse Recent Development10.10 HerbsofGold10.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors10.10.2 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Product Category, Application and Specification10.10.3 HerbsofGold Milk Thistle Health Tonic Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015-2020)10.10.4 Main Business Overview10.10.5 HerbsofGold Recent Development 11 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Upstream, Opportunities, Challenges, Risks and Influences Factors Analysis11.1 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Key Raw Materials11.1.1 Key Raw Materials11.1.2 Key Raw Materials Price11.1.3 Raw Materials Key Suppliers11.2 Manufacturing Cost Structure11.2.1 Raw Materials11.2.2 Labor Cost11.2.3 Manufacturing Expenses11.3 Milk Thistle Health Tonic Industrial Chain Analysis11.4 Market Opportunities, Challenges, Risks and Influences Factors Analysis11.4.1 Market Opportunities and Drivers11.4.2 Market Challenges11.4.3 Market Risks11.4.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis 12 Market Strategy Analysis, Distributors12.1 Sales Channel12.2 Distributors12.3 Downstream Customers 13 Research Findings and Conclusion 14 Appendix14.1 Methodology/Research Approach14.1.1 Research Programs/Design14.1.2 Market Size Estimation14.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation14.2 Data Source14.2.1 Secondary Sources14.2.2 Primary Sources14.3 Author Details14.4 Disclaimer

About Us:

QY Research established in 2007, focus on custom research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, data base and seminar services. The company owned a large basic data base (such as National Bureau of statistics database, Customs import and export database, Industry Association Database etc), experts resources (included energy automotive chemical medical ICT consumer goods etc.

View post:
Milk Thistle Health Tonic Market In Depth Research with Industry Driving Factors, Consumer Behaviour Analysis, Future Trends, Key Players and Forecast...

The UK is poised to lead the way as operators increase spending on North Sea decommissioning work amid low oil prices, according to a new report.

Independent research company Rystad Energy has predicted Britain is in line for nearly 80% of the 14billion it estimates could be spent on removal projects in north-west Europe over the next five years.

The researchers said that, with exploration and production budgets slashed since the Covid-19 pandemic took hold and sent oil prices tumbling and few profitable investment alternatives, operators are now likely to increase spending on decommissioning projects.

Rystad estimates the value for the market world-wide may reach 34.5billion by 2024.The report added that, with an average asset age of 25 years, the north-west European decommissioning sector could grow 20% in annual commitments over the next 18 months if the current low oil prices do not show signs of substantial recovery soon.

It continued: In addition to a rapidly maturing asset base and low oil prices that erode commercial viability and potential life extensions, the North Sea decommissioning market will also be helped by favourable service contract prices.

Rystad energy service analyst, Sumit Yadev, said: A protracted low price environment can potentially motivate operators to leverage low contract prices and commit to their asset retirement obligations, thus spurring decommissioning activity in the north-west Europe region.

This will also provide welcome opportunities for contractors in an otherwise gloomy oilfield services market.

The report warned increased spending on decommissioning may limit the room for operators to invest in other segments, including exploration, development and enhanced oil recovery initiatives.

Leading players such as Shell, Total, Repsol and Premier Oil are expected to assign 10% or more of their North Sea spending in the next five years to removal projects.

Only about 15% of North Sea assets have been decommissioned to date, but in its latest report, Rystad Energy predicts an average of 23 assets will cease production annually over the coming five years.

The research firm expects during the next decade operators will carry out the decommissioning of more than 2,500 wells in the sector, of which 1,500 are in the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) area.

It said nearly 300,000 tonnes of topsides will be removed from the UKCS by 2025, along with almost 100,000 tonnes of substructure.

With around 50 topsides due to be decommissioned, Rystad estimated an average removal cost of more than 4,300 per tonne.

Plugging and abandonment (P&A) of wells is expected to make up about 45% of decommissioning costs over the next five years, followed by platform removals, which will account for nearly 20% of total expenditure.

Platform wells will be the dominant segment for P&A activity, making up about 65% of the total well abandonment, while the rest are subsea wells.

But, in cost terms, subsea wells will take the lead at an average of 9m each to abandon, compared to 4m for a platform well.

Some of the leading assets that will drive the North Sea decommissioning market include the Brent, Ninian and Thistle fields in the UK and Gyda, in Norway.

Shells Brent project would emerge as the single largest asset decommissioned globally, representing an outlay of nearly 2.5bn alone over the coming decade.

Rystad said the current low oil prices could play a pivotal role in boosting decommissioning spending in the UK if they persist beyond the end of this year.

Nearly 10% of all UK offshore assets have lifting costs above 20 per barrel, which will hamper their life extension prospects and make removal a better financial option if low prices continue.

Read more here:
UK North Sea to dominate global decommissioning spend over next five years - News for the Oil and Gas Sector - Energy Voice