Is COVID-19 Coronavirus A Bioweapon From A Lab? Here Is What Debunks This Theory – Forbes
Posted: March 18, 2020 at 1:42 am
Here is a 3D image of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), formerly ... [+] known as the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). (Image: Getty)
Dont you just love conspiracy theories? Especially when two groups of people have pretty much the same conspiracy theory about each other?
Some folks including politicians in the U.S. and China have both suggested that the COVID-19 coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) thats causing the pandemic may actually be a bioweapon that was manufactured in a lab. The only difference between their conspiracy theories is whos being accused of doing the manufacturing.
On the one corner are some people in the U.S. who are hinting or in some cases openly claiming that China put together this virus. For example, look at what Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) tweeted out back on January 30:
Then, Steve Mosher wrote on February 22 an opinion piece for the New York Post entitled, Dont buy Chinas story: The coronavirus may have leaked from a lab. Take a wild guess at what Mosher wrote about in his piece. By the way, Mosher is not a biomedical scientist, but instead is the president of the Population Research Institute and author of book called Bully of Asia: Why Chinas Dream Is the New Threat to World Order. So chances are that he didnt love China in the first place. But who knows, love works in mysterious ways.
So what evidence have Cotton, Mosher, and others provided to support these suggestions or claims? Incriminating pictures? Suspicious emails? Some awkward selfies? Any kind of scientific evidence?
Well, as Cotton picked out, there just happens to be a biosafety level-four (BSL-4) laboratory situated in Wuhan, China, the city where the whole outbreak started. Oh, and the lab had housed some types of coronaviruses among other pathogens. Yep, thats the evidence.
As you probably know, proximity alone should not imply guilt. That would be like claiming that you farted whenever theres a bad smell and you happen to be in the vicinity. Sure you may have intestines but that doesnt mean that every foul stench emanated from your guts.
Plus, its a lot easier to leak a pocket of air though your butt than a virus from a BSL-4 facility. BSL-4 facilities maintain the highest level of security among bio-laboratories since they do work on dangerous potentially life-threatening agents such as the Ebola, Lassa fever, and Marburg viruses. So its not as if the people inside these labs are playing throw and catch with the viruses and stuffing them into their pockets. To be designated as a BSL-4, the lab has to have the appropriate ventilation systems, reinforced walls, security systems, and construction to keep the wrong things inside and the right things outside.
Is it unusual then to have a BSL-4 facility in a city like Wuhan, China? Not really. There are already at least six BSL-4 facilities in the U.S. in Atlanta, GA, Frederick, MD, Galveston, TX, Hamilton, MT, and San Antonio, TX. According to the Federation of American Scientists website, seven others may be planned, under construction, or possibly finished in various cities such as Boston, MA, and Richmond, VA. These labs in the U.S. also study and house a range of dangerous pathogens. So again having a lab that studies bad pathogens does not mean that the lab released anything.
Not to be outdone, some in China have made similar suggestions, except that its the U.S. that built the virus and released it in China. Well, thats original. For example, take a look at these three tweets from Zhao Lijian, Spokesperson and Deputy Director General, Information Department for the Foreign Ministry of China:
Yes, the claim is that the U.S. released a virus in China so that the U.S. can then eventually suffer the consequences of the spreading virus just a couple months later. Makes a whole lotta sense, except that it doesnt. Where exactly is the real evidence that the U.S. military created SARS-CoV2?
The back-and-forth dialogue has continued with President Donald Trump then referring to SARS-CoV2 as the Chinese Virus as can be seen here:
When questioned why he was using this label rather than the real scientific name of the virus, Trump claimed that it was in response to the claim that the U.S. military had created the virus. The video accompanying the following tweet shows the exchange:
Back and forth. Back and forth. Back and forth.
So, it looks like conspiracy theorists on both sides havent really provided any compelling evidence that SARS-CoV2 was produced in a lab, whether in the U.S., in China, or in the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.
In fact, there is not only a lack of evidence supporting these conspiracy theories, there has been growing strong scientific evidence against both of them. Scientists, you know the ones who are actually trying to find the truth and solve a problem rather than blame people, have been conducting genetic analyses to determine where the virus came from and how it ended up infecting humans. Although viruses arent exactly like people as they dont seem to have feelings or spread rumors, viruses do have genetic material like people, except their genetic material is not quite as complex as those of humans. Nevertheless, like humans, viruses still pass along such materials when they replicate and evolve. Its not as simple as The Jerry Springer Show using genetic testing to find out if a guy is someones father, but scientists can use more advanced genetic analysis to figure out the origins, the family tree of SARS-CoV2.
Indeed, strong clues had already emerged by February 26, 2020, when a Perspectives piece was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. In the piece, David M. Morens, M.D. and Peter Daszak, Ph.D. from the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D. wrote: Of course, scientists tell us that SARS-CoV-2 did not escape from a jar: RNA sequences closely resemble those of viruses that silently circulate in bats, and epidemiologic information implicates a bat-origin virus infecting unidentified animal species sold in Chinas live-animal markets.
This wasnt exactly a case of same bat channel, same bat time. But the first, more deadlier SARS virus seemed to cause the 2002-2003 outbreak after it had managed to jump from bats to humans via intermediate hosts such as masked palm civets. Yes, some masked beings may have inadvertently partnered with bats to bring the original SARS virus to humans. So it wouldnt be too surprising if something like that happened again for SARS-CoV2.
This illustration shows a close-up of the protein spikes on SARS-CoV2. (Image: Getty)
Even more evidence of a natural rather than human-made origin for SARS-CoV2 has emerged from a study described in a research letter just published in Nature Medicine. In the letter, a research team (Kristian G. Andersen from The Scripps Research Institute, Andrew Rambaut from the University of Edinburgh, W. Ian Lipkin from the Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, Edward C. Holmes from The University of Sydney and Robert F. Garry from Tulane University) described how they had analyzed the genetic sequences that code for the protein spikes on the surface of SARS-CoV2. The virus looks sort of like a medieval mace with multiple spikes sticking out from its spherical shape. These spikes arent just for show as the virus uses them to latch on to a cell that it wants to invade and then push its way into the cell. Very medieval stuff.
Apparently, portions of these spike proteins are so effective in targeting specific receptors on human cells that it is hard to imagine humans manufacturing them, not with known existing technology. The researchers then concluded that this feature and thus the new coronavirus could have in all likelihood only evolved over time naturally. You see humans can make useful stuff like ride-sharing apps but are still quite puny compared to nature when it comes to making stuff like viruses.
In fact, the research team found that the SARS-CoV-2 structure in general is quite different from what humans would have likely concocted. If a human had wanted to create a viral weapon, he or she would have started with the structure of a virus thats already known to cause illness in people. Naturally, if you want to make a weapon, you may want to start with something like a grenade launcher rather than a smoothie maker, not that the virus looks like either. Instead, the structure of SARS-CoV2 is quite similar to those of viruses known to infect bats and pangolins.
So all of this further supports the theory that the virus jumped from bats to humans via some intermediate animal host. This doesnt necessarily mean that the virus started causing trouble as soon as it started infecting humans. An alternative possibility is that it jumped a longer time ago and hung out among humans for a while before eventually evolving into its current troublesome selves. This latter possibility would be somewhat analogous to inviting someone to live with you because he or she initially seemed relatively harmless but then over time finding out that this flat mate has become a terror.
The findings from the genetic analyses are consistent with how SARS-CoV2 is currently behaving. The virus is not acting like a bio-weapon right now. The best bio-weapons kill at a much higher rate and can be readily transported and released. Imagine being told that a bio-weapon might take the lives of 1% to 3.4% of the people that it infects but you dont quite know specifically which ones. The difference between SARS-CoV2 and pathogens like the Ebola Virus or anthrax is like the difference between a bunch of sofas and a collection of missiles. Sure, the former can cause harm but not in a predictable and consistent manner. If someone actually decided to develop SARS-CoV2 as a bio-weapon, that person needs to find a new job.
So there you have it: scientific evidence trumping conspiracy theories. Will all of these scientific findings finally quash the virus-was-made-in-a-lab-and-it-is-your-fault rhetoric between the politicians and on social media? Probably not. Since when has science stopped such political rhetoric. Maybe, though, it will get more people to focus on the much more important matter at hand: trying to control this pandemic together.
See the article here:
Is COVID-19 Coronavirus A Bioweapon From A Lab? Here Is What Debunks This Theory - Forbes
- A New Price Tag for Breast Cancer Genetic Testing - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Genetic testing technologies - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Prostate Cancer Genetic testing - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Genetic Testing - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Genetic Testing - One of the Best Things to Happen to Me - littlemamauk - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- BowelGene - genetic testing - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Genetic Testing Fact Sheet - National Cancer Institute [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2015]
- Genetic Testing - Genetics Home Reference [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2015]
- FAQ About Genetic Testing - Genome.gov [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2015]
- Regulation of Genetic Tests [Last Updated On: June 9th, 2015] [Originally Added On: June 9th, 2015]
- Types of Genetic Testing - Genetics Home Reference [Last Updated On: June 29th, 2015] [Originally Added On: June 29th, 2015]
- Genetic Testing: What You Should Know - FamilyDoctor.org [Last Updated On: July 3rd, 2015] [Originally Added On: July 3rd, 2015]
- Genetic Testing - BRCA1 & BRCA2 Mutations | Susan G. Komen [Last Updated On: July 6th, 2015] [Originally Added On: July 6th, 2015]
- What is genetic testing? - Genetics Home Reference [Last Updated On: July 6th, 2015] [Originally Added On: July 6th, 2015]
- Genomics |Genetic Testing [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2015] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2015]
- What is genetic testing? - American Cancer Society [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2015] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2015]
- Genetic testing - WebMD [Last Updated On: September 2nd, 2015] [Originally Added On: September 2nd, 2015]
- Genetic Testing and Screening | Florida Hospital [Last Updated On: September 2nd, 2015] [Originally Added On: September 2nd, 2015]
- Genetic Testing Toledo OH - DNA Diagnostics Center [Last Updated On: September 29th, 2015] [Originally Added On: September 29th, 2015]
- Genetics - Genetic testing and counselling - NHS Choices [Last Updated On: October 25th, 2015] [Originally Added On: October 25th, 2015]
- Genetic Testing Germantown MD - DNA Diagnostics Center [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2016] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2016]
- GeneDx | Genetic Testing Company | The DNA Diagnostic Experts [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2016] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing - kidshealth.org [Last Updated On: February 24th, 2016] [Originally Added On: February 24th, 2016]
- BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing [Last Updated On: February 29th, 2016] [Originally Added On: February 29th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing - Breastcancer.org - Breast Cancer ... [Last Updated On: April 4th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 4th, 2016]
- Frequently Asked Questions About Genetic Testing - Genome.gov [Last Updated On: April 10th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 10th, 2016]
- Pregnancy & Prenatal Testing: Genetic Testing for Inherited ... [Last Updated On: April 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 19th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing | Family Caregiver Alliance [Last Updated On: April 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 19th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing - American Medical Association [Last Updated On: April 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 19th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing - Cancer Treatment | CTCA [Last Updated On: April 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 19th, 2016]
- genome.gov - FAQ About Genetic Testing [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2016]
- Family Cancer Genetics Program at UC San Diego Moores ... [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2016]
- Genetic Testing - Benefits, costs, and risks of genetic testing [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Myriad Genetics | Healthcare Professionals | About Genetic ... [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing | Gluten-Free Society [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Genetic testing - Canadian Cancer Society [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- genetic testing | Britannica.com [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing: Best Defense Against Breast Cancer? [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Genetic Testing | Issue List [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2016]
- Jewish Genetics, Part 1: Jewish Populations (Ashkenazim ... [Last Updated On: June 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 19th, 2016]
- What Is Genetic Testing -- Information About Genetic Testing [Last Updated On: June 23rd, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 23rd, 2016]
- Genetic Testing Report - genome.gov [Last Updated On: June 23rd, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 23rd, 2016]
- Good Laboratory Practices for Molecular Genetic Testing ... [Last Updated On: June 26th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 26th, 2016]
- Genetics and Cancer | American Cancer Society [Last Updated On: July 18th, 2016] [Originally Added On: July 18th, 2016]
- Genetic testing - FSH Society [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2016]
- Myriad Genetics | Patients & Families | Genetic Testing 101 [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2016]
- BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing Fact Sheet ... [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2016]
- FAQ About Genetic Testing - National Human Genome Research ... [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2016]
- Genetic testing - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2016]
- Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk | Cancer.Net [Last Updated On: November 25th, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 25th, 2016]
- Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment and Counseling (PDQ ... [Last Updated On: December 20th, 2016] [Originally Added On: December 20th, 2016]
- Patients Who Tested Positive For Genetic Mutations Fear Bias ... - NPR - NPR [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- Genetic Testing for the Healthy - Harvard Medical School (registration) [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- Genetic testing Overview - Mayo Clinic [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- The real reason why all women should get their DNA tested - Quartz [Last Updated On: July 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 4th, 2017]
- DNA insurance: Why genetic testing could revolutionise the industry - Verdict [Last Updated On: July 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 4th, 2017]
- Everything you need to know about the Government plan for genetic testing to treat cancer patients - BreakingNews.ie [Last Updated On: July 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 4th, 2017]
- Greater access to genetic testing needed for cancer diagnosis and treatment - Cancer Research UK [Last Updated On: July 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 5th, 2017]
- Chief medical officer calls for gene testing revolution - BBC News - BBC News [Last Updated On: July 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 5th, 2017]
- Genetic Testing Facilities and Cost - Breastcancer.org [Last Updated On: July 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 5th, 2017]
- Greater access to genetic testing needed for cancer diagnosis and ... - Medical Xpress [Last Updated On: July 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 7th, 2017]
- Global Breast Cancer Predictive Genetic Testing Market Outlook 2022 - PR Newswire (press release) [Last Updated On: July 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 7th, 2017]
- Invitae: Growth in Genetic Testing - Moneyshow.com (registration) [Last Updated On: July 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 7th, 2017]
- Cystic Fibrosis Among Asians: Why Ethnicity-Based Genetic Testing is Obsolete - PLoS Blogs (blog) [Last Updated On: July 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 7th, 2017]
- Hospital gets cardiac genetic test service created in memory of broadcaster's son - Belfast Telegraph [Last Updated On: July 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 8th, 2017]
- David Frost cardiac genetic testing service opens - BBC News - BBC News [Last Updated On: July 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 8th, 2017]
- UK's chief medical officer calls for gene testing revolution in cancer treatment - Daily Nation [Last Updated On: July 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 8th, 2017]
- Konica Minolta buys US genetic test maker in $1B deal - BioPharma Dive [Last Updated On: July 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 10th, 2017]
- Checking the cost of a genetic test - Chicago Tribune - Chicago Tribune [Last Updated On: July 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 11th, 2017]
- Genomic Testing in Oncology: From Single Genes to Whole Genomes - Labiotech.eu (blog) [Last Updated On: July 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 12th, 2017]
- Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing Can Be a Trip Down the Rabbit Hole - Newswise (press release) [Last Updated On: July 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 12th, 2017]
- DNA Diagnostics Center brings four genetic testing options to retail - Drug Store News [Last Updated On: July 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 12th, 2017]
- Jeans for Genes Day stall at Taree City Centre - Gloucester Advocate [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- She thought she was Irish until a DNA test opened a 100-year-old mystery - Chicago Tribune [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Genetic testing: The new way to identify and train elite athletes? - USA TODAY High School Sports [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Mail order genetic tests for health risks. How much do you want to ... - KOMO News [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Genetic Testing: Finding the cause of your infertility ... [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- SF's Invitae to acquire two prenatal genetic screening firms - SFGate [Last Updated On: August 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 1st, 2017]
- For Indian doctors, it's written in the genes not stars - Economic Times [Last Updated On: August 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 1st, 2017]