Like many other advances in science and medicine, CRISPR was inspired by nature. In this case, the idea was borrowed from a simple defense mechanism found in some microbes, such as bacteria.

To protect themselves against invaders like viruses, these microbes capture snippets of the intruders DNA and store them away as segments called CRISPRs, or clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats. If the same germ tries to attack again, those DNA segments (turned into short pieces of RNA) help an enzyme called Cas find and slice up the invaders DNA.

After this defense system was discovered, scientists realized that it had the makings of a versatile gene-editing tool. Within a handful of years, multiple groups had successfully adapted the system to edit virtually any section of DNA, first in the cells of other microbes, and then eventually in human cells.

There are still a lot of questions about all the ways that CRISPR might beput to use in cancer researchand treatment. But one thing is for certain: The field is moving incredibly fast and new applications of the technology are constantly popping up.

People are still improving CRISPR methods, Dr. [Jerry] Li said. Its quite an active area of research and development. Im sure that CRISPR will have even broader applications in the future.

Read the original post

Read more from the original source:
Diseases once thought incurable are now on the cusp of treatments. It's because of CRISPR. Here's a primer - Genetic Literacy Project

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Through the social and economic disruption that COVID-19 caused in 2020, the biomedical research community rose to the challenge and accomplished unprecedented feats of scientific acumen. With a new year ahead of us, even as the pandemic grinds on, we at The Scientist thought it was an opportune time to ask what might be on the life science innovation radar for 2021 and beyond. We tapped three members of the independent judging panel that helped name our Top 10 Innovations of 2020 to share their thoughts (via email) on the year ahead.

Paul Blainey: Value is shifting from the impact of individual technologies (mass spectrometry, cloning, sequencing, PCR, induced pluripotent stem cells, next generation sequencing, genome editing, etc.) to impact across technologies. In 2021, I think researchers will increasingly leverage multiple technologies together in order to generate new insights, as well as become more technology-agnostic as multiple technologies present plausible paths toward research goals.

Kim Kamdar: Partially in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, one 2021 headline will be the continued innovation focused on consumerization of healthcare, which is redefining how consumers engage with providers across each stage of care. Consumers are even selective about their healthcare choices now, and the retail powerhouses like CVS and Walmart have and will continue to develop solutions to meet the needs of their customers. While this was already underway prior to the pandemic, the crisis has spurred on this activity with the goal of making healthcare more accessible and affordable and ultimately delivering on better health outcomes for all Americans.

Robert Meagher: I think this is easymRNA delivery. This is something that has been in development for years for numerous applications, but the successful development and FDA emergency use authorization of two COVID-19 vaccines based on this technology shines a very bright spotlight on this technology. The vaccine trials and now widespread use of the vaccines will give developers a lot of data about the technology, and sets a baseline for understanding safety and side effects when considering future therapeutic applications outside of infectious disease.

PB:Single-cell technology is here to stay, although its use will continue to change. One analogy to be drawn is the shift we saw from the popularity ofde novo genome sequencing (during the human genome project and the early part of the NGS [next-generation sequencing] era to the rich array of re-sequencing applications practiced today. I expect new ways to use single-cell technology will continue to be discovered for some time to come.

KK: Innovation in single-cell technology has the potential to transform biological research driving to a level of resolution that provides a more nuanced picture of complex biology. Cost has been a key barrier for broader adoption of single-cell analysis. As better technology is developed, cost will be reduced and there will be an explosion in single-cell research. This dynamic will also allow for broader adoption of single-cell technology from translational research to clinical applications particularly in oncology and immunology.

RM: Yesthere is continuing innovation in this space, and room for continued innovation. One area that we have seen development recently, and I see it continuing, is to study single cells not just in isolation, but coupled with spatial information: understanding single cells and their interactions with their neighbors. I also wonder if the COVID-19 pandemic will spur increased interest in applying single-cell techniques to problems in infectious disease, immunology, and microbiology. A lot of the existing methods for single-cell RNA analysis (for example) work well for human or mammalian cells, but dont work for bacteria or viruses.

PB: The promises of CRISPR and gene editing are extraordinary. I cant wait to see how that field continues to develop.

KK: Much of the CRISPR technology focus since it was unveiled in 2012 has been on its utility to modify genes in human cells with the goal of treating genetic disease. More recently, scientists have shown the potential of using the CRISPR gene-editing technology for treatment of viral disease (essentially a programmable anti-viral that could be used to treat diseases like HIV, HBV, SARS, etc. . . .). These findings, published in Nature Communications, showed that CRISPR can be used to eliminate simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in rhesus macaque monkeys. If replicated in humans, in studies that will be initiated this year, CRISPR could be utilized to address HIV/AIDS and potentially make a major impact by moving a chronic disease to one with a functional cure.

PB: New therapeutic modalities that expand the addressable set of diseases are particularly exciting. Cell-based therapies offer versatile platforms for biological engineering that leverage the power of human biology. It is also encouraging to see somatic cell genome editing technology advance toward the clinic for the treatment of serious diseases.

The level of innovation that occurred in 2020 to combat COVID-19 will provide a more rapid, focused, and actionable reaction to future pandemics.

Kim Kamdar, Domain Associates

RM: Besides the great success with mRNA-based vaccines that sets the stage for other clinical technologies based on mRNA delivery, the other area that is really in the spotlight this year is diagnostics. There are a lot of labs and companies, both small and large, that have some really innovative products and ideas for portable and point-of-care diagnostics. For a long time, this was often thought of in terms of a problem for the developing world, or resource-limited locations: think, for example, of diagnostics for neglected tropical diseases. But the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated need for diagnostic testing on a massive scale has caused us to rethink what resource-limited means, and to understand the challenge posed by bottlenecks in supply chains, skilled personnel, and high-complexity laboratory facility. There has been a lot of foundational research over the past couple of decades in rapid, portable, easy-to-use diagnostics, but translating these to clinically useful products often seemed to stall, I suspect for lack of a lucrative market for such tests. But we are now starting to see FDA [emergency use authorization for] home-based tests and other novel diagnostic technologies to address needs with the COVID-19 pandemic, and I suspect that this paves the way for these technologies to start being applied to other diagnostic testing needs.

PB: Seeing the suffering and destruction wrought by COVID-19, it is obvious that we need to be prepared with more extensive, equitable, and better-coordinated response plans going forward. While rapid vaccine development and testing were two bright spots last year, there are so many important areas that demand progress. As we learn about how important details become in a crisisno matter how small or mundanediagnostic technologies and the calibration of public health measures are two areas that merit major focus.

KK: The life science community response to the COVID-19 pandemic has already proven to be light-years ahead of previous responses particularly in areas such as vaccine development and diagnostics. It took more than a year to sequence the genome of the SARS virus in 2002. The COVID-19 genome was sequenced in under a month from the first case being identified. Scientists and clinicians were able to turn that initial information to multiple approved vaccines at a blazing speed. Utilizing messenger RNA (mRNA) as a new therapeutic modality for vaccine development has now been validated. Vaccine science has been forever changed. The pandemic has also focused a much-needed level of attention to diagnostics, forcing a rethink of how to increase access, affordability, and actionability of diagnostic testing. The level of innovation that occurred in 2020 to combat COVID-19 will provide a more rapid, focused, and actionable reaction to future pandemics. In addition, the elevation of a science advisor (Dr. Eric Lander) to a cabinet level position in the Biden administration bodes well for our future ability to ground in data and as President Biden himself framed, refresh and reinvigorate our national science and technology strategy to set us on a strong course for the next 75 years, so that our children and grandchildren may inhabit a healthier, safer, more just, peaceful, and prosperous world.

RM: One thing that really kick-started research to address COVID-19 was the early availability of the complete genome sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the ongoing timely deposition of new sequences in nearreal-time as isolates were sequenced. This is in contrast to cases where deposition of large number of sequences may lag an outbreak by months or even years. I foresee the nearreal-time sharing of sequence information to become the new standard. Making the virus itself widely and inexpensively available, in inactivated form, as well as well-characterized synthetic viral RNA standards and proteins also helped spur research.

A trend Im less fond of is the rapid publication of nonpeer reviewed results as preprints online. Theres a great benefit to getting new information out to the community ASAP, but unfortunately I think the rush to get preprints up in some cases results in spreading misleading information. This problem is compounded with uncritical, breathless press releases accompanying the posting of preprints, as opposed to waiting for peer-review acceptance of a manuscript to issue a press release. I think the solution may lie in journals considering innovative approaches to speeding up peer review, or a way to at least perform a basic check for rigor prior to posting a preliminary version of the manuscript. Right now the extremes are: post an unreviewed preprint, or wait months or even years with multiple rounds of peer review including extensive additional experiments to satisfy the curiosity of multiple reviewers for high impact publications. Is there a way to prevent manuscripts from being published as preprints with obvious methodological errors or errors in statistical analysis, while also enabling interesting, well-done yet not fully polished manuscripts to be available to the community?

Paul Blaineyis an associate professor of biological engineering at MIT and a core member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University. The Blainey lab integrates new microfluidic, optical, molecular, and computational tools for application in biology and medicine. The group emphasizes quantitative single-cell and single-molecule approaches, aiming to enable studies that generate data with the power to reveal the workings of natural and engineered biological systems across a range of scales. Blainey has a financial interest in several companies that develop and/or apply life science technologies: 10X Genomics, GALT, Celsius Therapeutics, Next Generation Diagnostics, Cache DNA, and Concerto Biosciences.

Kim Kamdaris managing partner at Domain Associates, a healthcare-focused venture fund creating and investing in biopharma, device, and diagnostic companies. She began her career as a scientist and pursued drug-discovery research at Novartis/Syngenta for nine years.

Robert Meagheris a principal member of Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories. His main research interest is the development of novel techniques and devices for nucleic acid analysis, particularly applied to problems in infectious disease, biodefense, and microbial communities. Most recently this has led to approaches for simplified molecular diagnostics for emerging viral pathogens that are suitable for use at the point of need or in the developing world. Meaghers comments represent his professional opinion but do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Energy or the United States government.

See the article here:
Experts Predict the Hottest Life Science Tech in 2021 and Beyond - The Scientist

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Are you the type of investor who patiently plays the long game, or are you the more impulsive type? While it's easy to give in to the temptation to buy and sell your stocks based on short-term price movements, you'll see the largest gains when you buckle up for the long haul. Five years might seem like a long time to wait for your purchases to pay off, but when it comes to biotech stocks, practiced patience can pay off big.

All of the stocks below have recently met key milestones in their drug development efforts. More importantly, each is planning on making even bigger breakthroughs on the five-year horizon, so they're worth buying and holding until then. Given that these companies are still relatively early-stage and the risks of failure remain high, it'll be prudent for investors to diversify across all five rather than going all-in on any single stock.

Image source: Getty Images.

Late last year, CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) reported favorable results from early-stage clinical trials of its CTX001 gene-editing therapy for beta thalassemia and sickle cell disease. That's great news, as CTX001 is the company's most advanced program. Over the next five years, CTX001 will likely continue to move forward in clinical trials.

The same may be true for four of its immuno-oncology programs that are currently in clinical development. Elsewhere in the pipeline, its regenerative gene therapy for diabetes mellitus will enter its phase 1/2 clinical trials in 2021, and potentially conclude them in the following years. It needs that time to prove that its products are safe and effective.

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:LXRX) makes sotagliflozin, which is currently approved to treat type 1 diabetes in the EU. Soon, it will likely conclude its registration with U.S.-based regulators and initiate sales shortly thereafter. The company is also conducting phase 3 clinical trials for the drug to see if it's effective at treating heart failure. If successful, Lexicon will have a steady stream of revenue, and it could reach profitability in the next few years. Its project for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in phase 2 clinical trials could also drive shareholder returns even further, assuming it too gets approved.

Fate Therapeutics (NASDAQ:FATE) may not have any products approved for sale, but its collection of immuno-oncology treatments derived from pluripotent stem cells has already made its stock a high performer over the last year. While the stock is doubtlessly a bit expensive at the moment considering how far away the company is from recurring revenue, the company is establishing itself as a leader in the stem cell-derived therapeutics space, which will pay off down the line.

Fate currently has seven projects that are currently in phase 1 clinical trials, which means that it'll likely have at least one of those advancing into the final stages of the process by 2026.

CRSP data by YCharts

Jounce Therapeutics (NASDAQ:JNCE) focuses on developing cancer immunotherapies that address underserved patient populations, and it's been a great stock to own over the last year. It'll report two sets of data from a pair of its clinical trials in the second half of 2021, which could bolster a higher stock price.

Through the next few years, Jounce plans to submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) filing to regulators every 12 to 18 months, paving the way for new early-stage clinical trials. With innovation at such a rapid pace, investors will have plenty of growth catalysts to look forward to, assuming Jounce's projects continue to mature.

Corcept Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CORT) is special because it's already profitable, and it has a larger and more advanced pipeline than the other companies listed here. It makes the drug Korlym, a treatment for Cushing syndrome, and it's also exploring in phase 3 trials another drug for the same indication. The company also has a late-stage pancreatic cancer therapy in development, not to mention a handful of other mid-stage oncology and metabolic disease projects.

If you're a bit worried that the other biotechs on this list might not pay off, you can take heart in that Corcept is considerably safer. Though there's still no guarantee that its pipeline projects will turn into new revenue streams anytime soon, its quarterly revenue is growing by 6% year over year. And it barely has any debt, with a scant $3.03 million owed. In other words, this company's story over the next five years will be about using its proceeds from drug sales to invest heavily in its future opportunities for growth. For a biotech investor, there's no better position to be in.

Read the original here:
Got $5,000 and 5 Years to Wait? Buy These 5 Hot Biotech Stocks Now - Motley Fool

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Even after a decade of treating patients with hematologic malignancies with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, researchers are still trying to understand why most patients eventually relapse. Equally puzzling to some scientists is the question of these cellular interventions cause lasting remission at all in many patients.

Given that typical cancers consist of diverse cells, including those that do not express the antigens targeted by CAR-T cells, one would expect relapses through antigen escape to be much more common than currently observed in practice, explained Joshua Brody, MD, director of the Lymphoma Immunotherapy Program at The Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai in New York, New York. In CAR-T cells, maybe [only] 40% of patients have this antigen escape problem. Its weird to us that its not 100%, he said.

For instance, even though most patients with B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) possess over 1% of CD19-negative cells at diagnosis, the incidence of relapse after CD19-targeted therapy only approximates 20%.1,2 And, in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), similar response rates to CAR-T cell therapy have been observed regardless of tumoral expression of CD19.3 To Brody and colleagues, such observations suggest that CAR-T cells use mechanisms independent of antigen targeting to eliminate tumor cells.

A study published by Brodys team and collaborators at Kite Pharma in Cancer Discovery in December 2020 offered one explanation.4 Experiments in animal models suggested that CAR-T cells can kill off-target cells that are in the vicinity of the cells theyre designed to target, offering the first in vivo proof of localized bystander killing. This off-target effect is mediated by the interaction between the protein Fasa cell death receptor expressed on many cellular surfacesand its ligand, which is present on T cells. In fact, tumoral expression of Fas was predictive of survival in patients with DLBCL who were treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in the phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02348216).

I think its becoming more and more [clear] that the CAR-Ts, in addition to their CAR interaction with the tumor antigen, rely on the Fas-Fas ligandinteraction to exert their killing. The next question is, how do we manipulate these pathways safely to make CARs more potent? said Saad J. Kenderian, MB, ChB, a consultant in the division of hematology in the department of internal medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, who was not involved in the study.

The new research was the result of a serendipitous observation made during a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) screen exploring the genes that tumor cells use to either resist or facilitate cytotoxic T cell killing. The team noticed in cell culture that T cells engineered to target a specific protein would not only kill the on-target lymphoma cells expressing that protein, but also the cells that did not.

Further experiments pointed to Fas as a mediator of this process. When the researchers experimentally removed the gene encoding Fas from cultured lymphoma cells, they noticed that this protected both on-target and off-target cells. This was the case even as T-cells emitted the cell death-inducing molecules granzyme and perforin, which are thought to represent the main method of killing.

T cells require an interaction with their target antigen to kill a cell via the perforin and granzyme mechanism, but as long as off-target cells are in the direct vicinity of on-target cells, Brodys results suggest that T-cells can eliminate them via the Fas-dependent mechanism. Essentially, you kill the target cell youre going after and just to be safe, you [also] kill the cell next door, he said.

Further cell culture and mouse experiments bolstered this hypothesis. In one experiment, mice treated with murine CD19 CD3-CD28 CAR-T cells had similar rates of survival irrespective of whether their lymphoma tumors consisted of mixed antigen-positive and negative cells or only of antigen-expressing cells. However, ifwe gave Fas ligand-blocking antibody, then those mice died sooner, Brody added.

See the article here:
Bystander Killing Could Be Key Factor in CAR-T Success in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma - Cancer Therapy Advisor

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Earlier this month, Alphabet (GOOG) took the air out of its Loon subsidiary, a former moonshot project for deploying internet around the world using high-flying balloons. Apparently, the economics just didnt work out. No word on how much Googles parent company spent on Loon, but SoftBank had sunk $125 million into the business in 2019. This seems like the latest sign that the tech giant is tightening its belt a bit in an increasingly risky regulatory environment. That made us wonder whats happening with another venture that isnt contributing anything to its bottom line. Lets dive into Calico, a subsidiary focused on life extension research and development.

Calico is pretty much the opposite of Verily Life Sciences, the Alphabet unit working to digitize healthcare in every possible way. Verily is one of the few companies that does generate some revenue among the $461 million that its sideline subsidiaries earned through the first nine months of 2020. Some of the joint ventures connected to Verily are developing apps or new medical devices, with a certain amount of publicity and transparency. Calico operates more like a nonprofit research center thats secretly working on some biotech version of the Manhattan Project, so most of what we read is pretty superficial and saccharine.

At face value, Calico is pure anti-aging R&D, starting at the very beginning of the problem with what is aging? For example, one of its public-facing projects involves studying how yeast ages, apparently without in situ experiments involving a teenagers room. The premise (in very broad strokes) is that if we can understand how yeast age at the cellular level, we could all one day look like Brad Pitt forever. But the biggest news to emerge is that Calico scientists created a bit of new technology to help analyze the yeast cells, enabling genome-wide characterization of the aging process, which certainly sounds significant and was published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The Miniature-chemostat Aging Device (MAD) purifies 50 million old cells in a single test tube to speed up the search for genetic biomarkers of aging. An additional platform that sounds similar to the technology used in lab-on-a-chip solutions developed by companies like Berkeley Lights (BLI) allows scientists to observe the entire aging process in single cells hundreds of thousands each week allowing them to screen for lifespan-extending modifications that can increase the yeast lifespan beyond that of your ordinary lab yeast. The company integrated computer vision and machine learning to recognize cell division from time-lapse images or to measure the age of a cell directly from static images.

While a new cell-counting gizmo using AI sounds great, thats certainly not something out of reach for any large research university. Calico is a company that has at least $2.5 billion in funding thanks to its most high-profile partnership with AbbVie (ABBV), a pharmaceutical company with a market cap of nearly $200 billion as of late January 2021.

The companies first joined forces in September 2014. Three years later, Calico and AbbVie had already burned through $1 billion, but that didnt stop the duo from extending their research collaboration and kicking in another $500 million each, according to the San Francisco Business Times. So you would think theres some high-pressure expectation to produce an anti-aging Brad Pitt pill or something significant. What has all that money produced? According to the company, the partnership has resulted in two dozen early-stage programs addressing disease states across oncology and neuroscience and new insights into the biology of aging.

The 2018 deal makes Calico responsible for research and early development until 2022 and for advanced collaboration projects through Phase 2a clinical trials through 2027. In fact, theres actually a whisper of something finally gaining traction. Endpoints News was the first to report that a team from Calico and AbbVie is conducting a phase 1 safety study to test a drug called ABBV-CLS-579 for treating solid tumors. The article also noted how one of the companys principal investigators just published a paper in Nature on how Calico is using AI to predict genome folding from DNA sequence alone.

Calico is mining for answers to longevity in human DNA by creating its own hardware and software to automate and accelerate that search. One of its other high-profile ventures, in fact, involved mining the genetic database of Ancestry.com for three years. The Holy Grail was to find genetic commonalities among those who live longer, but research delivered some unexpected results. Another study based on the Ancestry data in another prestigious journal, Genetics, found that while longevity runs in families, DNA isnt as strong an influence on how long an individual lives, so just because Grandpa Joe lived to 103 doesnt mean youre going to outlive a lifetime of junk food.

Other ongoing collaborations include the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, the Buck Institute for Research on Aging, and C4 Therapeutics (CCCC), a small-cap biotech company focused on treating diseases of aging, including cancer, by degrading proteins known to drive disease.

Pretty much every story on Calico refers to the fact that the former Genentech CEO Art Levinson, who has a PhD in biochemistry, is in charge of the Alphabet subsidiary. Acquired by Roche for nearly $47 billion about a dozen years ago, Genentech was considered the worlds oldest and most successful biotechnology company. Its also worth noting that he serves on the boards of Apple and the Broad Institute, as well as formerly served on the boards of small-cap biotechs, including Amyris Biotechnologies, a synthetic biology stock. He is also an advisor on a bunch of scientific boards. So the assumption is that this guy knows what hes doing in terms of his scientific expertise needed to lead one of the most well-funded, private, anti-aging R&D labs in the world.

As we told you more than five years ago, Calico will likely forever be an innovation lab similar to Alphabets DeepMind AI lab in London. The only thing close to a pure-play in the longevity theme is perhaps C4 Therapeutics, which has developed a novel platform for harnessing the bodys natural mechanisms for regulating protein levels to fight diseases of aging. But the Boston area biopharmaceutical company is on pace to double its losses in 2020 from 2019, and it gets all of its revenue from collaboration agreements like the one with Calico. Well just have to wait for a Brad Pitt pill and make our money on the market the old-fashioned way over time.

Pure-play disruptive tech stocks are not only hard to find, but investing in them is risky business. That's whywe created The Nanalyze Disruptive Tech Portfolio Report, which lists 20disruptive techstocks we love so much weve invested in them ourselves. Find out which tech stocks we love, like, and avoid in this special report, now available for all Nanalyze Premiumannual subscribers.

Here is the original post:
Calico Purring Right Along With Life Extension Research - Nanalyze

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

By Pleasanton Express Staff | on January 27, 2021

The Texas A&M Agri- Life Extension Service in Atascosa County has some events coming up to help families reach their health goals.

Walk N Talk

Join the 2021 Walk N Talk FABLOW AgriLife group on Facebook, a walking program that kicks off on Feb. 1. This eight-week series is a multi-county collaboration between the Extension Service in Frio, Atascosa, Bee, Live Oak and Wilson Counties.

They will have daily posts, weekly lessons with live cooking and walking sessions. Each week, a new fruit or vegetable will be featured. Lets support each other in a fun and simple way.

Cooking Well for Healthy Blood Pressure

The Extension Service will also host the upcoming series, Cooking Well for Healthy Blood Pressure. This online cooking school is designed to help those concerned about high blood pressure and anyone who prepares meals for them.

This series of three interactive classes is full of research-based information and healthy recipes. Classes will be held via Zoom on these dates:

Feb. 2, DASHing to Improved Health

Feb. 9, A Virtual Grocery Store Tour

Feb. 16, Cooking with Spices and Herbs

All classes are at noon. Presenters will be Nicole Demmer, Wilson County FCH Agent; Dru Benavides, Atascosa County FCH Agent, Hillary Long, Bastrop County FCH Agent and Methodist Healthcare Ministries Nurses.

Please RSVP to bastroptx@tamu.edu or call 512- 581-7186. Are you ready to explore the new flavors of heart-healthy meals? Sign up today.

More:
Get healthy in Feb. with AgriLife - Pleasanton Express

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

A New Research Published by DBMR on the Global Wellness Supplements Market (COVID 19 Version) in various regions to produce more than 300+ page reports. This study is a perfect blend of qualitative and quantifiable information highlighting key market developments, industry and competitors challenges in gap analysis and new opportunities and may be trending in the Wellness Supplements Market..The study begins with the Wellness Supplements introduction, market dynamics in terms of drivers, restraints, challenges, and regulatory scenario by region and countries. Further, Wellness Supplements report involves market overview, key players profiling, key developments, suppliers of raw materials and dealers, among other information. It also consists of market size, sales, share, industry growth rate, and revenue.The Wellness Supplements market report helps in understanding customer inclination towards purchasing products.The report considers major regions Covers namely North America, Europe, Japan, China, Southeast Asia, India, Middle East & Africa, and South America.

Download Free Exclusive Sample (350 Pages PDF) Report: To Know the Impact of COVID-19 on this Industry @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-wellness-supplements-market&AS

Top Key Players of the Market:

Scope of the Report:

Wellness Supplements market research report lends a hand with organization to gain vital information about the competitors, economic shifts, demographics, current market trends and spending traits of the customers. This global marketing report provides real world research solutions for every industry sector, along with meticulous data collection from non-public sources to better equip businesses with the information they need most. The report covers the scope, size, disposition and growth of the industry including the key sensitivities and success factors. A world class Wellness Supplements market report also covers five year industry forecasts, growth rates and an analysis of the industry key players and their market shares.

Impact of COVID-19:

The report involves insightful data on the main sectors of the Global Wellness Supplements Market. The report has segmented market, by its types and applications. Regional insights on the Wellness Supplements market around several geographies has been covered in this insightful study, coupled with country-level analysis. Influential market dynamics across regional segments are slated in the report, with their magnitudes differing from country to country. Each segment has analyzed completely on the basis of its production, consumption as well as revenue.

Segmentation: Wellness Supplements Market

By Dietary Supplements (Vitamin, Mineral, Botanical, Probiotics, Fatty Acid, Protein, Others)

By Functional Food and Beverage (Functional Bakery and Confectionary, Functional Dairy, Energy Drink, Sports Drink, Infant Formula and Baby Food, Others)

By Nutricosmetics (Skin Care, Hair Care, Weight Management, Others)

Increasing penetration of smartphones, tablets and other mobile platform; increasing utilization of connected medical devices and Wellness Supplements application and increasing healthcare cost are some factors driving the growth of the market. Additionally, rising acceptance of Wellness Supplements as a primary source of information has impelled the market growth positively. Moreover, it covers the government regulations & policies of prominent regions that are affecting the dynamics of the market.Conclusive study about the growth plot of Wellness Supplements Market for forthcoming years.In-depth understanding of market-particular drivers, constraints and major micro markets.

To receive extensive list of important regions, ask for TOC here @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-wellness-supplements-market&AS

Global Wellness Supplements Market Scope and Market Size:-

Wellness supplements market is segmented on the basis of dietary supplements, functional food and beverage, nutricosmetics and free from food. The growth amongst these segments will help you analyse meagre growth segments in the industries and provide the users with valuable market overview and market insights to help them in making strategic decisions for identification of core market applications.

KEY BENEFITS

On the Basis of Region

The report is mainly segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth rate of Wellness Supplements in these regions, from 2021 to 2028, covering:

U.S., Canada and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K.

Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Rest of Europe in Europe

China, Japan, India, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand

Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA)

Enquire Here for, Report Enquiry, Discount and Customization: https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/inquire-before-buying/?dbmr=global-wellness-supplements-market&AS

Benefits of Buying The Report:

About Data Bridge Market Research:

An absolute way to forecast what future holds is to comprehend the trend today!

Data Bridge Market Research set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavours to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process. Data bridge is an aftermath of sheer wisdom and experience which was formulated and framed in the year 2015 in Pune.

Data Bridge Market Research has over 500 analysts working in different industries. We have catered more than 40% of the fortune 500 companies globally and have a network of more than 5000+ clientele around the globe. Data Bridge adepts in creating satisfied clients who reckon upon our services and rely on our hard work with certitude. We are content with our glorious 99.9 % client satisfying rate.

Contact Us:-

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

Email:-corporatesales@databridgemarketresearch.com

Read the original:
Wellness Supplements Market Statistics 2021- Industry Insights and COVID-19 impact analysis with Future Opportunities 2027 | Life Extension, OPTAVIA,...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

TSX: GPR | NYSE American: GPL

(All dollar amounts expressed in US dollars unless otherwise noted)

VANCOUVER, BC, Jan.29, 2021 /PRNewswire/ - Great Panther Mining Limited (TSX: GPR) (NYSE-A: GPL) ("Great Panther" or the "Company") announces today it has filed the "Technical Report on the 2020 Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources of the Tucano Gold Mine, Amapa State, Brazil" ("Technical Report"). The Technical Report supports the Company's updated Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimate ("MRMR") for Tucano announced by news release onDecember 15, 2020.

The Technical Report has an effective date ofSeptember 30, 2020, and is available on SEDAR at http://www.sedar.comand on the Company's website at http://www.greatpanther.com,and will be filed on EDGAR as soon as practicable at http://www.sec.gov.

2021 Exploration Programs and Exploration Strategy Update

"Our 2020 exploration programs were successful in extending the existing open pit mine life at Tucano and adding significant resources to our mineral inventory for the Guanajuato Mine Complex", stated Rob Henderson, President and CEO. "2021 will represent a significant increase in our exploration efforts with a planned record of 90,000 metres of drilling representing a $13 million investment. Our key objectives will be to continue to extend the Tucano open pit mine life, further prove up the underground with a view to extending the high-grade zones, and make meaningful inroads into key targets in the expansive Tucano regional land package. Building on our 2020 exploration success in Mexico will also be a key focus for this year."

The Great Panther exploration strategy is built on the objective of result driven exploration programs leading to resource replacement and near-mine growth, and longer-term organic growth through regional exploration.

The following outlines Great Panther's 90,000 metres ("m") drilling program for 2021.

Drilling Program

Meters

USD (millions)

Tucano (Brazil)

Open pit

24,000

3.5

Underground

8,000

1.7

Regional

28,000

3.2

Sub-Total

60,000

8.4

Mexican Operating Mines

GMC(1)

15,000

2.0

Topia

5,000

1.0

Sub-Total

20,000

3.0

Other Projects(2)

10,000

2.0

Total

90,000

13.4

(1)

"GMC" refers to the Guanajuato Mine Complex comprised of the Guanajuato Mine, San Ignacio Mine and the Cata processing plant.

(2)

Planned 2021 drilling metres and expenditure for Other Projects (described below) are new disclosures. The Company previously provided planned 2021 drilling expenditures for the Tucano Mine and Mexican operating mines in its January 14, 2021 press release which provided production and cost guidance for these mines.

Tucano (Brazil)

Great Panther's strategy for Tucano is to explore and grow the gold resource potential of the tenement portfolio, covering an almost 2,000 square kilometres ("km2") portion of the Vila Nova Greenstone Belt (the "Belt"). In 2021, five drill rigs are planned to complete 60,000m of drilling and over 500km of regional soil sampling will identify high priority regional targets.

The Tucano Gold Mine is host to a 7-kilometer-long trend of gold deposits surrounded by the large, near 2,000km2 tenement package controlled by Great Panther. Despite the long history of the deposit, discovered in the late 1990's and with first production in 2005, little exploration or resource drilling has been carried out outside the Tucano mine trend. A number of targets were defined in aero-geophysical and regional geochemical surveys in the late 1990's and Great Panther plans include carrying exploration of those viewed as the highest potential targets within reasonable proximity of the current mining operations.

Open Pit Resource replacement and expansion. The 24,000m combined Reverse Circulation ("RC") and Diamond Drilling ("DD") campaign is focused on near-mine targets including TAPC, Urso and Torres, as well as testing of several geochemical anomalies associated with the mine sequence that have not been evaluated.

Urucum underground. The current underground MRMR incorporates just part of the anomalous trend below the Urucum pits. There are a number of high-grade mineralized zones suggested by the modelling of the historical drilling. The 8,000m diamond drilling program is focused on upgrading one of the known high-grade zones at Urucum North while testing another zone at Urucum Central. The extent of these high-grade zones is important in determining the placement of the primary decline that will be used to access the mining areas.

Regional target drilling. A total of 28,000m has been planned for fast-track evaluation of key targets such as Mutum, Saraminda and Lona Amarela using Auger, Rotary Air Blast ("RAB") and RC drilling programs plus multi-element soil geochemistry. Initial orientation studies in 2020 and currently underway at Mutum suggest the interpretation of detailed soil sampling using multi-element geochemical analyses will allow for the skipping of the auger drilling step and going straight to RAB or RC drilling, which is expected to accelerate the start of drill permitting processes by four to eight months. A detailed soil grid is currently being opened to cover the 5km long Mutum gold trend and RAB and RC programs are being prepared for Saraminda and Lona Amarela. Mutum, Saraminda and Lona Amarela are within 15 km of the of the existing mine operations.

New target generation. Having defined the regional structural model associated with the mineralization events, Great Panther has prioritized high potential exploration corridors within the 2000km2 area of interest. It has initiated a program of regional multi-element soil sampling over these corridors with the intention of defining new targets within the Belt and prioritizing these targets using the combination of the geochemistry and existing regional aero-geophysical data.

Mexico

San Ignacio.Exploration efforts continue with 5,000m of fill-in surface drilling planned along the Purisima veins south of the development of the San Pedro ramp, deeper in the Purisima/Purisima alto vein system and continue testing for Au-Ag mineralization along 1.1km of Purisima vein north from the old San Ignacio shaft.

Guanajuato. A concerted effort of sampling and geological mapping in accessible parts of the historical mining areas is near completion and will be followed by a planned 10,000m of underground drilling on the most prospective areas, including along the north side of Valenciana, between Valenciana and Cata, and in the Pozos, Promontorio, and Guanajuatito areas. The 2020 exploration efforts more than doubled the known Inferred Mineral Resource estimate. See the Company's news release dated November 23, 2020 and the related technical report filed on December 23, 2020 with an effective date of July 31, 2020 for more details.

Topia. 5,000 m exploration surface drilling are planned focussed on defining new Mineral Resources in six areas along the strike and down-dip extents of present mining efforts.

Other Projects

Other Projects. These may include the Plomo gold project in Sonora ("Plomo"), El Horcn which has proximity to the GMC, or Coricancha in Peru. The $2.0 million budgeted for these projects will be allocated on the basis of a number of factors including potential for return on investment, access and availability of resources, community and permitting considerations. Plans for Plomo, for example, will see detailed geological / alteration / structural mapping to confirm an earlier geological interpretation from 2012, before any surface drill testing. El Horcon drilling will be subject to a successful study on the addition of a zinc concentrate flotation for the Guanajuato plant. Drilling for Coricancha would focus on expanding readily accessible high grade Mineral Resources along the Constancia, Wellington, and Escondida veins and is subject to achieving acceptable community agreements for access.

QUALIFIED PERSONS

All scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Neil Hepworth, Chartered Engineer MIMMM, Chief Operating Officer of Great Panther, Nicholas Winer, FAusIMM, Vice-President, Exploration of Great Panther, and Robert F. Brown, P. Eng., Geological Consultant of Great Panther, each a non-independent Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101)".

ABOUT GREAT PANTHER

Great Panther is a growing gold and silver producer focused on the Americas. The Company owns a diversified portfolio of assets inBrazil,MexicoandPeruthat includes three operating gold and silver mines, four exploration projects, and an advanced development project. Great Panther is actively exploring large land packages in highly prospective districts and is pursuing acquisition opportunities to complement its existing portfolio. Great Panther trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol GPR, and on the NYSE American under the symbol GPL.

CAUTIONARY NOTES ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws (together, "forward-looking statements"). Such forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: the Tucano Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates and the GMC Mineral Resource estimates and the assumptions underlying the estimates; the Tucano life of mine extensions; the Company's ability to advance successfully opportunities for resource growth and mine life extension in the future; the exploration potential of Tucano near-mine, underground and regional land package; the Company's plans to complete and results of further exploration and drilling at Tucano, Topia, GMC, Plomo, El Horcn and Coricancha; the Company's ability to further prove up the underground resources to support the development of an underground mine; the Company's ability to successfully execute and fund its exploration strategies as planned; and the Company's plans to pursue acquisition opportunities to complement its existing portfolio.

These forward-looking statements and information reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant operational, business, economic and regulatory uncertainties, and contingencies. These assumptions include: the accuracy of the Company's Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates and the assumptions upon which they are based; ore grades and recoveries; metal prices remaining as estimated; national and international transportation arrangements to deliver Tucano's gold dor to international refineries continue to remain available, despite inherent risks due to COVID19; international refineries that the Company uses continue to operate and refine the Company's gold dor, and in a timely manner such that the Company is able to realize revenue from the sale of its refined metal in the timeframe anticipated, despite inherent risks due to COVID19; currency exchange rates remaining as estimated; capital, decommissioning and reclamation estimates; prices for energy inputs, labour, materials, supplies and services (including transportation); all necessary permits, licenses and regulatory approvals for the Company's operations and exploration and drilling programs are received in a timely manner and maintained, including the various drilling permits required to complete the programs; the Company will be able to access the prospective exploration and drilling areas without interruption; continued operations at Tucano in accordance with the Company's mine plan, including the expectations regarding the ongoing geotechnical control of Urucum Central South ("UCS") where mining re-started in the last week of October; management's estimates in connection with the assessment of provisions for loss and contingent liabilities relating to legal proceedings may differ materially from the ultimate loss or damages incurred by the Company; assumption that the Company will be successful in resolving the legal claims that ban the use of cyanide in the Tucano processing; management's estimates regarding the carrying value of its mineral properties may be subject to change in future financial periods, which may result in further writedowns and consequential impairment loss; conditions in the financial markets; the ability to procure equipment and operating supplies and that there are no material unanticipated variations in the cost of energy or supplies; the accuracy of the geological, operational and price and exchange rate assumptions on which the cost assumptions are based; operations not being disrupted by issues such as pit-wall failures or instability, mechanical failures, labour disturbances and workforce shortages, illegal occupations or mining, seismic events, and adverse weather conditions; the Company's expectations that metallurgical, environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, political, marketing or other issues will not materially affect the estimates or Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources or its future mining plans; and the Company's ability to comply with environmental, health and safety laws. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive.

These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements to be materially different. Such factors include, among others, risks and uncertainties relating to: the impact of COVID19 on the Company's ability to operate as anticipated, including the risk of an unplanned partial or full shutdown of the Company's mines and processing plants, whether voluntary or imposed by authorities, which would adversely impact the Company's revenues, financial condition and ability to meet its production and cost guidance; the inherent risk that estimates of Mineral Reserves and Resources may not be accurate or that the assumptions upon which they are based are different than expected; the discontinuity of the ore body and mine selectivity may result in a risk that dilution and mining recovery estimates used in the Mineral Reserve estimation do not accurately reconcile with the Company's ability to recover the tonnage, grade and metal content estimated in the Mineral Reserves; metal prices may decline or may be less than forecasted; fluctuations in currency exchange rates (including the U.S. dollar to Brazilian real exchange rate) may increase costs of operations; potential of further instability or failure of walls of the UCS pit, which compromises a material part of the Mineral Reserves being accessed in 2021; there is no assurance that the Company will be able to continue mining and be able to access the UCS Mineral Reserves which may adversely impact the Company's Mineral Reserve estimates, production plans and future revenues, including the potential risk that the Mineral Reserves at UCS may not be accessible at all or that access may be dependent on further remedial work that might interrupt operations; operational and physical risks inherent in mining operations (including pit wall collapses, tailings storage facility failures, environmental accidents and hazards, industrial accidents, equipment breakdown, unusual or unexpected geological or structural formations, cave-ins, flooding and severe weather) may result in unforeseen costs, shut downs, delays in production and exposure to liability; risk that the Company is not successful in its litigation, including a risk that the use of cyanide would be banned in respect of Tucano's operations causing Tucano to have to cease operations if an alternative to cyanide treatment cannot be identified and implemented in a cost-effective way (of which there is no assurance); planned exploration activities may not result in conversion of existing Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves or discovery of new Mineral Resources; potential political and social risks involving Great Panther's operations in a foreign jurisdiction; the potential for unexpected costs and expenses or overruns; employee and contractor relations; relationships with, and claims by, local communities; the Company's ability to obtain and maintain all necessary permits, licenses and regulatory approvals in a timely manner, which if not granted could result in an interruption to operations, including the permits and approvals of the expansion of the GMC tailings facility and the exploration and drilling programs required to complete the various programs being planned; changes in laws, regulations and government practices in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; legal restrictions related to mining; diminishing quantities or grades of Mineral Reserves as properties are mined; operating or technical difficulties in mineral exploration; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; the Company's inability to meet its production forecasts or to generate the anticipated cash flows from operations could result in the Company's inability to meet its scheduled debt payments when due or to meet financial covenants to which the Company is subject; ability to maintain and renew agreements with local communities to support continued operations, including any access which may be required for the exploration and drilling programs described in this news release; there is no assurance that the Company will be able to identify or complete acquisition opportunities; and other risks and uncertainties, including those described in respect of Great Panther, in its annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2019 and material change reports filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators available at http://www.sedar.comand reports on Form 40-F and Form 6-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at http://www.sec.gov.

There is no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove accurate or that actual results will not vary materially from these forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, described, or intended. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements and information are designed to help readers understand management's current views of our near- and longer-term prospects and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not intend, nor does it assume any obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, changes in assumptions, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable law.

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES

The Company prepares its disclosure in accordance with the requirements of securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Terms relating to Mineral Resources in this news release are defined in accordance with NI 43-101 under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves 2014 (CIM Definition Standards).

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has adopted amendments effective February 25, 2019 (the "SEC Modernization Rules") to its disclosure rules to modernize the mineral property disclosure requirements for issuers whose securities are registered with the SEC under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC Modernization Rules have replaced SEC Industry Guide 7, which will be rescinded following a transition period and after the required compliance date of the SEC Modernization Rules.

As a result of the adoption of the SEC Modernization Rules, the SEC will now recognize estimates of "Measured Mineral Resources", "Indicated Mineral Resources" and "Inferred Mineral Resources", which are defined in substantially similar terms to the corresponding CIM Definition Standards. In addition, the SEC has amended its definitions of "Proven Mineral Reserves" and "Probable Mineral Reserves" to be substantially similar to the corresponding CIM Definition Standards.

United States investors are cautioned that while the foregoing terms are "substantially similar" to corresponding definitions under the CIM Definition Standards, there are differences in the definitions under the SEC Modernization Rules and the CIM Definition Standards. Accordingly, there is no assurance any Mineral Resources that the Company may report as "Measured Mineral Resources", "Indicated Mineral Resources" and "Inferred Mineral Resources" under NI 43-101 would be the same had the Company prepared the resource estimates under the standards adopted under the SEC Modernization Rules.

United States investors are also cautioned that while the SEC will now recognize "Measured Mineral Resources", "Indicated Mineral Resources" and "Inferred Mineral Resources", investors should not assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories would ever be converted into a higher category of Mineral Resources or into Mineral Reserves. Mineralization described by these terms has a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to assume that any "Measured Mineral Resources", "Indicated Mineral Resources", or "Inferred Mineral Resources" that the Company reports are or will be economically or legally mineable.

Further, "Inferred Resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Therefore, United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the Inferred Resources exist. In accordance with Canadian securities laws, estimates of "Inferred Mineral Resources" cannot form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies, except in limited circumstances where permitted under NI 43-101.

In addition, disclosure of "contained ounces" is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC has historically only permitted issuers to report mineralization as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

SOURCE Great Panther Mining Limited

http://www.greatpanther.com

See the original post:
Great Panther Files NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Tucano Gold Mine and Provides Update on Exploration Strategy and Programs for 2021 - PRNewswire

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Newswise PHILADELPHIAScientists in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania have uncovered the molecular causes of a congenital form of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), an often-fatal heart disorder.

This inherited form of DCM which affects at least several thousand people in the United States at any one time and often causes sudden death or progressive heart failure is one of multiple congenital disorders known to be caused by inherited mutations in a gene called LMNA. The LMNA gene is active in most cell types, and researchers have not understood why LMNA mutations affect particular organs such as the heart while sparing most other organs and tissues.

In the study, published this week in Cell Stem Cell, the Penn Medicine scientists used stem cell techniques to grow human heart muscle cells containing DCM-causing mutations in LMNA. They found that these mutations severely disrupt the structural organization of DNA in the nucleus of heart muscle cells but not two other cell types studied leading to the abnormal activation of non-heart muscle genes.

Were now beginning to understand why patients with LMNA mutations have tissue-restricted disorders such as DCM even though the gene is expressed in most cell types, said study co-senior author Rajan Jain, MD, an assistant professor of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cell and Developmental Biology at the Perelman School of Medicine.

Further work along these lines should enable us to predict how LMNA mutations will manifest in individual patients, and ultimately we may be able to intervene with drugs to correct the genome disorganization that these mutations cause, said study co-senior author Kiran Musunuru, MD, PhD, a professor of Cardiovascular Medicine and Genetics, and Director of the Genetic and Epigenetic Origins of Disease Program at Penn Medicine.

Inherited LMNA mutations have long puzzled researchers. The LMNA gene encodes proteins that form a lacy structure on the inner wall of the cell nucleus, where chromosomes full of coiled DNA are housed. This lacy structure, known as the nuclear lamina, touches some parts of the genome, and these lamina-genome interactions help regulate gene activity, for example in the process of cell division. The puzzle is that the nuclear lamina is found in most cell types, yet the disruption of this important and near-ubiquitous cellular component by LMNA mutations causes only a handful of relatively specific clinical disorders, including a form of DCM, two forms of muscular dystrophy, and a form of progeria a syndrome that resembles rapid aging.

To better understand how LMNA mutations can cause DCM, Jain, Musunuru, and their colleagues took cells from a healthy human donor, and used the CRISPR gene-editing technique to create known DCM-causing LMNA mutations in each cell. They then used stem cell methods to turn these cells into heart muscle cells cardiomyocytes and, for comparison, liver and fat cells. Their goal was to discover what was happening in the mutation-containing cardiomyocytes that wasnt happening in the other cell types.

The researchers found that in the LMNA-mutant cardiomyocytes but hardly at all in the other two cell types the nuclear lamina had an altered appearance and did not connect to the genome in the usual way. This disruption of lamina-genome interactions led to a failure of normal gene regulation: many genes that should be switched off in heart muscle cells were active. The researchers examined cells taken from DCM patients with LMNA mutations and found similar abnormalities in gene activity.

A distinctive pattern of gene activity essentially defines what biologists call the identity of a cell. Thus the DCM-causing LMNA mutations had begun to alter the identity of cardiomyocytes, giving them features of other cell types.

The LMNA-mutant cardiomyocytes also had another defect seen in patients with LMNA-linked DCM: the heart muscle cells had lost much of the mechanical elasticity that normally allows them to contract and stretch as needed. The same deficiency was not seen in the LMNA-mutant liver and fat cells.

Research is ongoing to understand whether changes in elasticity in the heart cells with LMNA mutations occurs prior to changes in genome organization, or whether the genome interactions at the lamina help ensure proper elasticity. Their experiments did suggest an explanation for the differences between the lamina-genome connections being badly disrupted in LMNA-mutant cardiomyocytes but not so much in LMNA-mutant liver and fat cells: Every cell type uses a distinct pattern of chemical marks on its genome, called epigenetic marks, to program its patterns of gene activity, and this pattern in cardiomyocytes apparently results in lamina-genome interactions that are especially vulnerable to disruption in the presence of certain LMNA mutations.

The findings reveal the likely importance of the nuclear lamina in regulating cell identity and the physical organization of the genome, Jain said. This also opens up new avenues of research that could one day lead to the successful treatment or prevention of LMNA-mutations and related disorders.

Other co-authors of the study were co-first authors Parisha Shah and Wenjian Lv; and Joshua Rhoades, Andrey Poleshko, Deepti Abbey, Matthew Caporizzo, Ricardo Linares-Saldana, Julie Heffler, Nazish Sayed, Dilip Thomas, Qiaohong Wang, Liam Stanton, Kenneth Bedi, Michael Morley, Thomas Cappola, Anjali Owens, Kenneth Margulies, David Frank, Joseph Wu, Daniel Rader, Wenli Yang, and Benjamin Prosser.

Funding was provided by the Burroughs Wellcome Career Award for Medical Scientists, Gilead Research Scholars Award, Pennsylvania Department of Health, American Heart Association/Allen Initiative, the National Institutes of Health (DP2 HL147123, R35 HL145203, R01 HL149891, F31 HL147416, NSF15-48571, R01 GM137425), the Penn Institute of Regenerative Medicine, and the Winkelman Family Fund for Cardiac Innovation.

###

Penn Medicineis one of the worlds leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. Penn Medicine consists of theRaymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (founded in 1765 as the nations first medical school) and theUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System, which together form a $8.6 billion enterprise.

The Perelman School of Medicine has been ranked among the top medical schools in the United States for more than 20 years, according toU.S. News & World Report's survey of research-oriented medical schools. The School is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $494 million awarded in the 2019 fiscal year.

The University of Pennsylvania Health Systems patient care facilities include: the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Penn Presbyterian Medical Centerwhich are recognized as one of the nations top Honor Roll hospitals byU.S. News & World ReportChester County Hospital; Lancaster General Health; Penn Medicine Princeton Health; and Pennsylvania Hospital, the nations first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional facilities and enterprises include Good Shepherd Penn Partners, Penn Medicine at Home, Lancaster Behavioral Health Hospital, and Princeton House Behavioral Health, among others.

Penn Medicine is powered by a talented and dedicated workforce of more than 43,900 people. The organization also has alliances with top community health systems across both Southeastern Pennsylvania and Southern New Jersey, creating more options for patients no matter where they live.

Penn Medicine is committed to improving lives and health through a variety of community-based programs and activities. In fiscal year 2019, Penn Medicine provided more than $583 million to benefit our community.

Read the original post:
Stem Cell Study Illuminates the Cause of a Devastating Inherited Heart Disorder - Newswise

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

KENILWORTH, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has adopted a positive opinion recommending approval of an expanded label for KEYTRUDA, Mercks anti-PD-1 therapy. The opinion is recommending KEYTRUDA as monotherapy for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 3 years and older with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who have failed autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or following at least two prior therapies when ASCT is not a treatment option.

This recommendation is based on results from the pivotal Phase 3 KEYNOTE-204 trial, in which KEYTRUDA monotherapy demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with brentuximab vedotin (BV), a commonly used treatment. KEYTRUDA reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 35% (HR=0.65 [95% CI, 0.48-0.88]; p=0.00271) and showed a median PFS of 13.2 months versus 8.3 months for patients treated with BV. The recommendation is also based on supportive data from an updated analysis of the KEYNOTE-087 trial, which supported the European Commissions (EC) approval of KEYTRUDA for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory cHL who have failed ASCT and BV or who are transplant ineligible and have failed BV. The CHMPs recommendation will now be reviewed by the EC for marketing authorization in the European Union (EU), and a final decision is expected in the first quarter of 2021. If approved, this will be the first pediatric indication for KEYTRUDA in the EU.

This positive opinion reinforces the importance of KEYTRUDA for certain adult and pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the European Union, said Dr. Vicki Goodman, vice president, clinical research, Merck Research Laboratories. We look forward to the decision by the European Commission and will continue to expand our clinical development program in blood cancers with KEYTRUDA and our recently acquired investigational therapies to help address the unmet needs of patients.

Merck is studying KEYTRUDA across hematologic malignancies through a broad clinical program, including multiple registrational trials in cHL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma and more than 60 investigator-initiated studies across 15 tumors. In addition to KEYTRUDA, Merck is evaluating two clinical-stage assets for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies: MK-1026 (formerly ARQ 531), a Brutons tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and VLS-101, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting ROR1.

About KEYNOTE-204

KEYNOTE-204 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02684292) is a randomized, open-label, Phase 3 trial evaluating KEYTRUDA monotherapy compared with BV for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory cHL. The primary endpoints are PFS and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), complete remission rate (CRR) and safety. The study enrolled 304 patients, aged 18 years and older, who were randomized to receive either:

About Hodgkin Lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma is a type of lymphoma that develops in the white blood cells called lymphocytes, which are part of the immune system. Hodgkin lymphoma can start almost anywhere most often in lymph nodes in the upper part of the body, with the most common sites being in the chest, neck or under the arms. Worldwide, there were approximately 83,000 new cases of Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed, and more than 23,000 people died from the disease in 2020. In the EU, there were nearly 20,000 new cases of Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed, and nearly 4,000 people died from the disease in 2020. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma accounts for more than nine in 10 cases of Hodgkin lymphoma in developed countries.

About KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Injection, 100 mg

KEYTRUDA is an anti-PD-1 therapy that works by increasing the ability of the bodys immune system to help detect and fight tumor cells. KEYTRUDA is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby activating T lymphocytes which may affect both tumor cells and healthy cells.

Merck has the industrys largest immuno-oncology clinical research program. There are currently more than 1,300 trials studying KEYTRUDA across a wide variety of cancers and treatment settings. The KEYTRUDA clinical program seeks to understand the role of KEYTRUDA across cancers and the factors that may predict a patient's likelihood of benefitting from treatment with KEYTRUDA, including exploring several different biomarkers.

Selected KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Indications in the U.S.

Melanoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph node(s) following complete resection.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

KEYTRUDA, in combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations.

KEYTRUDA, in combination with carboplatin and either paclitaxel or paclitaxel protein-bound, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC.

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 [tumor proportion score (TPS) 1%] as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations, and is stage III where patients are not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation, or metastatic.

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 (TPS 1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving KEYTRUDA.

Small Cell Lung Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least 1 other prior line of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

KEYTRUDA, in combination with platinum and fluorouracil (FU), is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or with unresectable, recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or with unresectable, recurrent HNSCC whose tumors express PD-L1 [combined positive score (CPS) 1] as determined by an FDA-approved test.

KEYTRUDA, as a single agent, is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of pediatric patients with refractory cHL, or cHL that has relapsed after 2 or more lines of therapy.

Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or who have relapsed after 2 or more prior lines of therapy. KEYTRUDA is not recommended for treatment of patients with PMBCL who require urgent cytoreductive therapy.

Urothelial Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who are not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 10), as determined by an FDA-approved test, or in patients who are not eligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive, high-risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumors who are ineligible for or have elected not to undergo cystectomy.

Microsatellite Instability-High or Mismatch Repair Deficient Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)

This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials. The safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA in pediatric patients with MSI-H central nervous system cancers have not been established.

Microsatellite Instability-High or Mismatch Repair Deficient Colorectal Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic MSI-H or dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC).

Gastric Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 1) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease progression on or after two or more prior lines of therapy including fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-containing chemotherapy and if appropriate, HER2/neu-targeted therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Esophageal Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 10) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease progression after one or more prior lines of systemic therapy.

Cervical Cancer

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer with disease progression on or after chemotherapy whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 1) as determined by an FDA-approved test. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Renal Cell Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA, in combination with axitinib, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Tumor Mutational Burden-High

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) [10 mutations/megabase] solid tumors, as determined by an FDA-approved test, that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials. The safety and effectiveness of KEYTRUDA in pediatric patients with TMB-H central nervous system cancers have not been established.

Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

KEYTRUDA is indicated for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) that is not curable by surgery or radiation.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

KEYTRUDA, in combination with chemotherapy, is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) whose tumors express PD-L1 (CPS 10) as determined by an FDA-approved test. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on progression-free survival. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.

Selected Important Safety Information for KEYTRUDA

Severe and Fatal Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

KEYTRUDA is a monoclonal antibody that belongs to a class of drugs that bind to either the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) or the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, thereby removing inhibition of the immune response, potentially breaking peripheral tolerance and inducing immune-mediated adverse reactions. Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can occur in any organ system or tissue, can affect more than one body system simultaneously, and can occur at any time after starting treatment or after discontinuation of treatment. Important immune-mediated adverse reactions listed here may not include all possible severe and fatal immune-mediated adverse reactions.

Monitor patients closely for symptoms and signs that may be clinical manifestations of underlying immune-mediated adverse reactions. Early identification and management are essential to ensure safe use of antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatments. Evaluate liver enzymes, creatinine, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during treatment. In cases of suspected immune-mediated adverse reactions, initiate appropriate workup to exclude alternative etiologies, including infection. Institute medical management promptly, including specialty consultation as appropriate.

Withhold or permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA depending on severity of the immune-mediated adverse reaction. In general, if KEYTRUDA requires interruption or discontinuation, administer systemic corticosteroid therapy (1 to 2 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) until improvement to Grade 1 or less. Upon improvement to Grade 1 or less, initiate corticosteroid taper and continue to taper over at least 1 month. Consider administration of other systemic immunosuppressants in patients whose adverse reactions are not controlled with corticosteroid therapy.

Immune-Mediated Pneumonitis

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated pneumonitis. The incidence is higher in patients who have received prior thoracic radiation. Immune-mediated pneumonitis occurred in 3.4% (94/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including fatal (0.1%), Grade 4 (0.3%), Grade 3 (0.9%), and Grade 2 (1.3%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 67% (63/94) of patients. Pneumonitis led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in 1.3% (36) and withholding in 0.9% (26) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement; of these, 23% had recurrence. Pneumonitis resolved in 59% of the 94 patients.

Pneumonitis occurred in 8% (31/389) of adult patients with cHL receiving KEYTRUDA as a single agent, including Grades 3-4 in 2.3% of patients. Patients received high-dose corticosteroids for a median duration of 10 days (range: 2 days to 53 months). Pneumonitis rates were similar in patients with and without prior thoracic radiation. Pneumonitis led to discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in 5.4% (21) of patients. Of the patients who developed pneumonitis, 42% of these patients interrupted KEYTRUDA, 68% discontinued KEYTRUDA, and 77% had resolution.

Immune-Mediated Colitis

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated colitis, which may present with diarrhea. Cytomegalovirus infection/reactivation has been reported in patients with corticosteroid-refractory immune-mediated colitis. In cases of corticosteroid-refractory colitis, consider repeating infectious workup to exclude alternative etiologies. Immune-mediated colitis occurred in 1.7% (48/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (1.1%), and Grade 2 (0.4%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 69% (33/48); additional immunosuppressant therapy was required in 4.2% of patients. Colitis led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in 0.5% (15) and withholding in 0.5% (13) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement; of these, 23% had recurrence. Colitis resolved in 85% of the 48 patients.

Hepatotoxicity and Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

KEYTRUDA as a Single Agent

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated hepatitis. Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 0.7% (19/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.4%), and Grade 2 (0.1%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 68% (13/19) of patients; additional immunosuppressant therapy was required in 11% of patients. Hepatitis led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in 0.2% (6) and withholding in 0.3% (9) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement; of these, none had recurrence. Hepatitis resolved in 79% of the 19 patients.

KEYTRUDA with Axitinib

KEYTRUDA in combination with axitinib can cause hepatic toxicity. Monitor liver enzymes before initiation of and periodically throughout treatment. Consider monitoring more frequently as compared to when the drugs are administered as single agents. For elevated liver enzymes, interrupt KEYTRUDA and axitinib, and consider administering corticosteroids as needed. With the combination of KEYTRUDA and axitinib, Grades 3 and 4 increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (20%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (13%) were seen, which was at a higher frequency compared to KEYTRUDA alone. Fifty-nine percent of the patients with increased ALT received systemic corticosteroids. In patients with ALT 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (Grades 2-4, n=116), ALT resolved to Grades 0-1 in 94%. Among the 92 patients who were rechallenged with either KEYTRUDA (n=3) or axitinib (n=34) administered as a single agent or with both (n=55), recurrence of ALT 3 times ULN was observed in 1 patient receiving KEYTRUDA, 16 patients receiving axitinib, and 24 patients receiving both. All patients with a recurrence of ALT 3 ULN subsequently recovered from the event.

Immune-Mediated Endocrinopathies

Adrenal Insufficiency

KEYTRUDA can cause primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency. For Grade 2 or higher, initiate symptomatic treatment, including hormone replacement as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA depending on severity. Adrenal insufficiency occurred in 0.8% (22/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.3%), and Grade 2 (0.3%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 77% (17/22) of patients; of these, the majority remained on systemic corticosteroids. Adrenal insufficiency led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in <0.1% (1) and withholding in 0.3% (8) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement.

Hypophysitis

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated hypophysitis. Hypophysitis can present with acute symptoms associated with mass effect such as headache, photophobia, or visual field defects. Hypophysitis can cause hypopituitarism. Initiate hormone replacement as indicated. Withhold or permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA depending on severity. Hypophysitis occurred in 0.6% (17/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.3%), and Grade 2 (0.2%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 94% (16/17) of patients; of these, the majority remained on systemic corticosteroids. Hypophysitis led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in 0.1% (4) and withholding in 0.3% (7) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement.

Thyroid Disorders

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated thyroid disorders. Thyroiditis can present with or without endocrinopathy. Hypothyroidism can follow hyperthyroidism. Initiate hormone replacement for hypothyroidism or institute medical management of hyperthyroidism as clinically indicated. Withhold or permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA depending on severity. Thyroiditis occurred in 0.6% (16/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 2 (0.3%). None discontinued, but KEYTRUDA was withheld in <0.1% (1) of patients.

Hyperthyroidism occurred in 3.4% (96/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 3 (0.1%) and Grade 2 (0.8%). It led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in <0.1% (2) and withholding in 0.3% (7) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement. Hypothyroidism occurred in 8% (237/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 3 (0.1%) and Grade 2 (6.2%). It led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in <0.1% (1) and withholding in 0.5% (14) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement. The majority of patients with hypothyroidism required long-term thyroid hormone replacement. The incidence of new or worsening hypothyroidism was higher in 1185 patients with HNSCC, occurring in 16% of patients receiving KEYTRUDA as a single agent or in combination with platinum and FU, including Grade 3 (0.3%) hypothyroidism. The incidence of new or worsening hypothyroidism was higher in 389 adult patients with cHL (17%) receiving KEYTRUDA as a single agent, including Grade 1 (6.2%) and Grade 2 (10.8%) hypothyroidism.

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Which Can Present With Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Monitor patients for hyperglycemia or other signs and symptoms of diabetes. Initiate treatment with insulin as clinically indicated. Withhold KEYTRUDA depending on severity. Type 1 DM occurred in 0.2% (6/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA. It led to permanent discontinuation in <0.1% (1) and withholding of KEYTRUDA in <0.1% (1). All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement.

Immune-Mediated Nephritis With Renal Dysfunction

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated nephritis. Immune-mediated nephritis occurred in 0.3% (9/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 4 (<0.1%), Grade 3 (0.1%), and Grade 2 (0.1%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 89% (8/9) of patients. Nephritis led to permanent discontinuation of KEYTRUDA in 0.1% (3) and withholding in 0.1% (3) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement; of these, none had recurrence. Nephritis resolved in 56% of the 9 patients.

Immune-Mediated Dermatologic Adverse Reactions

KEYTRUDA can cause immune-mediated rash or dermatitis. Exfoliative dermatitis, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and toxic epidermal necrolysis, has occurred with antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatments. Topical emollients and/or topical corticosteroids may be adequate to treat mild to moderate nonexfoliative rashes. Withhold or permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA depending on severity. Immune-mediated dermatologic adverse reactions occurred in 1.4% (38/2799) of patients receiving KEYTRUDA, including Grade 3 (1%) and Grade 2 (0.1%) reactions. Systemic corticosteroids were required in 40% (15/38) of patients. These reactions led to permanent discontinuation in 0.1% (2) and withholding of KEYTRUDA in 0.6% (16) of patients. All patients who were withheld reinitiated KEYTRUDA after symptom improvement; of these, 6% had recurrence. The reactions resolved in 79% of the 38 patients.

Other Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions

The following clinically significant immune-mediated adverse reactions occurred at an incidence of <1% (unless otherwise noted) in patients who received KEYTRUDA or were reported with the use of other antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatments. Severe or fatal cases have been reported for some of these adverse reactions. Cardiac/Vascular: Myocarditis, pericarditis, vasculitis; Nervous System: Meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis and demyelination, myasthenic syndrome/myasthenia gravis (including exacerbation), Guillain-Barr syndrome, nerve paresis, autoimmune neuropathy; Ocular: Uveitis, iritis and other ocular inflammatory toxicities can occur. Some cases can be associated with retinal detachment. Various grades of visual impairment, including blindness, can occur. If uveitis occurs in combination with other immune-mediated adverse reactions, consider a Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like syndrome, as this may require treatment with systemic steroids to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss; Gastrointestinal: Pancreatitis, to include increases in serum amylase and lipase levels, gastritis, duodenitis; Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue: Myositis/polymyositis rhabdomyolysis (and associated sequelae, including renal failure), arthritis (1.5%), polymyalgia rheumatica; Endocrine: Hypoparathyroidism; Hematologic/Immune: Hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi lymphadenitis), sarcoidosis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ transplant rejection.

Infusion-Related Reactions

KEYTRUDA can cause severe or life-threatening infusion-related reactions, including hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis, which have been reported in 0.2% of 2799 patients receiving KEYTRUDA. Monitor for signs and symptoms of infusion-related reactions. Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion for Grade 1 or Grade 2 reactions. For Grade 3 or Grade 4 reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue KEYTRUDA.

Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Fatal and other serious complications can occur in patients who receive allogeneic HSCT before or after antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Transplant-related complications include hyperacute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), acute and chronic GVHD, hepatic veno-occlusive disease after reduced intensity conditioning, and steroid-requiring febrile syndrome (without an identified infectious cause). These complications may occur despite intervening therapy between antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatment and allogeneic HSCT. Follow patients closely for evidence of these complications and intervene promptly. Consider the benefit vs risks of using antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatments prior to or after an allogeneic HSCT.

Increased Mortality in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

In trials in patients with multiple myeloma, the addition of KEYTRUDA to a thalidomide analogue plus dexamethasone resulted in increased mortality. Treatment of these patients with an antiPD-1/PD-L1 treatment in this combination is not recommended outside of controlled trials.

Embryofetal Toxicity

Based on its mechanism of action, KEYTRUDA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Advise women of this potential risk. In females of reproductive potential, verify pregnancy status prior to initiating KEYTRUDA and advise them to use effective contraception during treatment and for 4 months after the last dose.

Adverse Reactions

In KEYNOTE-006, KEYTRUDA was discontinued due to adverse reactions in 9% of 555 patients with advanced melanoma; adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation in more than one patient were colitis (1.4%), autoimmune hepatitis (0.7%), allergic reaction (0.4%), polyneuropathy (0.4%), and cardiac failure (0.4%). The most common adverse reactions (20%) with KEYTRUDA were fatigue (28%), diarrhea (26%), rash (24%), and nausea (21%).

In KEYNOTE-054, KEYTRUDA was permanently discontinued due to adverse reactions in 14% of 509 patients; the most common (1%) were pneumonitis (1.4%), colitis (1.2%), and diarrhea (1%). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 25% of patients receiving KEYTRUDA. The most common adverse reaction (20%) with KEYTRUDA was diarrhea (28%).

See original here:
Merck Receives Positive EU CHMP Opinion for Expanded Approval of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) in Certain Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Classical...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

GlobeNewswire2021-02-01

Acumen Research and Consulting, a global provider of market research studies, in a recently published report titledBone Marrow Transplantation Market Global Industry Analysis, Market Size, Opportunities and Forecast, 2020-2027

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 01, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Global Bone Marrow Transplantation Market size is projected to reach US$ 15 Bn by 2027, with CAGR of 5.7% during 2020-2027

Download Sample Pages Of This Report@ https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/request-sample/2425

Disease, cancer, or chemotherapy may damage or kill the bone marrow. A surgical procedure is known as bone marrow transplantation, which replaces compromised or lost bone marrow. Stem cells are collected, processed, frozen and stored in a patient's autologous transplant and then returned to the patient after intensive therapy. Stem cells are obtained from an appropriate donor in an allogeneic transplant and transplanted to the recipient to cure the disease and rebuild the immune system of the recipient.

The growing prevalence of cancer and anemia is the leading catalyst for the growth of global demand for bone marrow transplantation. In turn, global demand for bone marrow transplantation will also expand with advances in technology, enhanced health services, recent evidence of cardiac and neuronal bone marrow transplantation, expanded logistic treatment development and increased per-capita health spending. However, high treatment costs, shortage of bone marrow donors and payment instability in many countries remain a major barrier to the global demand for bone marrow transplantation.

View Table Of Content Of This Report@ https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/bone-marrow-transplantation-market

Cell therapy and tissue engineering products for commercialization

The growing demand for bone marrow transplantation is expected to expand in the industry with several organizations involved in clinical trials for cell therapy and tissue engineering products worldwide. Many of the companies have grown from R&D to full market firms. Over the last five years, some have experienced over 30% growth. Stem cell graft is one of the fastest growing cell therapies on the market, estimated at USD 510 million by the end of 2015.

Small Bone Marrow Repayment and Billing Laps

In developed regions, the inability to pay for organ transplantation techniques in tandem with cost-effective bone marrow transplantation has contributed to the slower implementation of the bone marrow transplantation method, particularly in developing regions. Approximately 30% of the world's people consider their bone transplantation to be financially secure.

The CMS payment scheme, which returns significantly low compared to real bone marrow transplantation prices, underlines the limited scope of drugs. The amount of government interest is 47% higher than the actual cost of the operation. This adds up to nearly US$ 40,000 in transplant costs in US medical transplant hospitals.

The increase in allogeneic demand for bone marrow transplants is driven by a lower incidence of disease recurrence and a strong increase in eligible donors.

Bone marrow transplantation with allogeneic substances is currently leading the bone marrow transplantation type. Demand for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is driven by large increases in healthy patients and a reduced risk of disease recurrence. The market will soon be dominated by autologous bone marrow transplant due to the increasing number of stem cell banks that store healthy cells in patients and the development of healthy blood cells in patients after treatment with conditioning.

Browse Upcoming Market Research Reports@ https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/forthcoming-reports

The lymphoma indicator is behind a significant uptick in new cases of Hodgkin and increased survival levels for post-bone marrow transplantation.

The bone marrow transplantation industry is mainly in the lymphoma group. This consists of 2 types of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 83,180 new cases of lymphoma were registered by the National Cancer Center (NCI) in 2018. Lymphoma progression is driven by a large increase in lymphoma patients and a higher survival rate after bone marrow transplantation. Throughout 2018, 60,300 new cases of leukemia have been reported by the National Cancer Institute, while leukemia is irregular in the development of white blood cells in the bone marrow.

Regional Stance

Europe held significant market share in 2019 in bone marrow transplantation owing to the high number of bone marrow transplants and the expansion of bone marrow registries. With strong potential for treatment, Latin America is expected to see a significant increase in the number of bone marrow transplants.

Key Players & Strategies

Participants include major global Agendia, Sanofi, Diadexus Inc., Abbott, Qiagen N.V., and Others.

Inquiry Before Buying@ https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/inquiry-before-buying/2425

Buy This Premium Research Report https://www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/buy-now/0/2425

Would like to place an order or any question, please feel free to contact atsales@acumenresearchandconsulting.com| +1 407 915 4157

For Latest Update Follow Us:

Tweets by AcumenRC

https://www.facebook.com/acumenresearchandconsulting

https://www.linkedin.com/company/acumen-research-and-consulting

Continued here:
Bone Marrow Transplantation Market to Surpass US$ 15 Bn By 2027: Acumen Research And Consulting - IT News Online

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Stem Cell Therapy Market is valued at USD 9.32 Billion in 2018 and expected to reach USD 16.51 Billion by 2025 with the CAGR of 8.5% over the forecast period.

Rising prevalence of chronic diseases, increasing spend on research & development and increasing collaboration between industry and academia driving the growth of stem cell therapy market.

Scope of Stem Cell Therapy Market-

Stem cells therapy also known as regenerative medicine therapy, stem-cell therapy is the use of stem cells to prevent or treat the condition or disease. Stem cell are the special type of cells those differentiated from other type of cell into two defining characteristics including the ability to differentiate into a specialized adult cell type and perpetual self-renewal. Under the appropriate conditions in the body or a laboratory stem cells are capable to build every tissue called daughter cells in the human body; hence these cells have great potential for future therapeutic uses in tissue regeneration and repair. Among stem cell pluripotent are the type of cell that can become any cell in the adult body, and multipotent type of cell are restricted to becoming a more limited population of cells.

Get Sample of This Report@ https://brandessenceresearch.com/requestSample/PostId/1246

The stem cell therapy has been used to treat people with conditions including leukemia and lymphoma, however this is the only form of stem-cell therapy which is widely practiced. Prochymal are another stem-cell therapy was conditionally approved in Canada in 2012 for the treatment of acute graft-vs-host disease in children those are not responding to steroids. Nevertheless, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only established therapy using stem cells. This therapy involves the bone marrow transplantation.

Stem cell therapy market report is segmented based on type, therapeutic application, cell source and by regional & country level. Based upon type, stem cell therapy market is classified into allogeneic stem cell therapy market and autologous market.

Stem Cell Therapy Companies:

Stem cell therapy market report covers prominent players like,

Based upon therapeutic application, stem cell therapy market is classified into musculoskeletal disorders, wounds and injuries, cardiovascular diseases, surgeries, gastrointestinal diseases and other applications. Based upon cell source, stem cell therapy market is classified into adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, cord blood/embryonic stem cells and other cell sources

The regions covered in this stem cell therapy market report are North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of the World. On the basis of country level, market of stem cell therapy is sub divided into U.S., Mexico, Canada, U.K., France, Germany, Italy, China, Japan, India, South East Asia, GCC, Africa, etc.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Segmentation

By Type

Allogeneic Stem Cell Therapy Market, By Application

Autologous Market, By Application

By Therapeutic Application

By Cell Source

Stem Cell Therapy Market Dynamics

Rising spend on research and development activities in the research institutes and biotech industries driving the growth of the stem cell therapy market during the forecast period. For instance, in January 2010, U. S. based Augusta University initiated Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a single, autologous cord blood stem infusion for treatment of cerebral palsy in children. The study is estimated to complete in July 2020. Additionally, increasing prevalence of chronic diseases creating the demand of stem cell therapy. For instance, as per the international diabetes federation, in 2019, around 463 million population across the world were living with diabetes; by 2045 it is expected to rise around 700 million. Among all 79% of population with diabetes were living in low- and middle-income countries. These all factors are fuelling the growth of market over the forecast period. On the other flip, probabilities of getting success is less in the therapeutics by stem cell may restrain the growth of market. Nevertheless, Advancement of technologies and government initiative to encourage research in stem cell therapy expected to create lucrative opportunity in stem cell therapy market over the forecast period.

Stem Cell Therapy Market Regional Analysis

North America is dominating the stem cell therapy market due increasing adoption rate of novel stem cell therapies fueling the growth of market in the region. Additionally, favorable government initiatives have encouraging the regional market growth. For instance, government of Canada has initiated Strategic Innovation Fund Program, in which gov will invests in research activities carried out for stem cell therapies. In addition, good reimbursing scheme in the region helping patient to spend more on health. Above mentioned factors are expected to drive the North America over the forecast period.

Full Research Report @ https://brandessenceresearch.com/healthcare/stem-cell-therapy-market-size

About us: Brandessence Market Research and Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Brandessence market research publishes market research reports & business insights produced by highly qualified and experienced industry analysts. Our research reports are available in a wide range of industry verticals including aviation, food & beverage, healthcare, ICT, Construction, Chemicals, and lot more. Brand Essence Market Research report will be best fit for senior executives, business development managers, marketing managers, consultants, CEOs, CIOs, COOs, and Directors, governments, agencies, organizations, and Ph.D. Students. We have a delivery center in Pune, India and our sales office is in London.

Contact usat: +44-2038074155 ormail usatsales@brandessenceresearch.com

Website: https://brandessenceresearch.com/

Article: https://businessstatsnews.com

Blog: https://technologyindustrynews.com

Blog: https://marketstatsreport.com

Blog: https://industrywatchnews.com/

Read the rest here:
Stem Cell Therapy Market 2021: Global Key Players, Trends, Share, Industry Size, Segmentation, Forecast To 2027 KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper - KSU |...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

The SA Bone Marrow Registry (SABMR) says their ability to recruit new donors has been severely limited by the outbreak of the second Covid-19 wave.

SABMR head of donor recruitment Nadia Chalkley said they typically recruit a few hundred new donors each year from the Eastern Cape.

The shrinking pool of donors has had a material impact on our ability to match patients suffering from life threatening blood diseases with suitable donors, she said.

At any given time, there are more than 200 patients in SA that need a bone marrow transplant. The fewer donors we have, the lesser the chance of finding a match. For patients with leukemia, thalassemia and other blood disorders, a bone marrow transplant is their only hope of survival.

Chalkley said the the current odds of finding a successful match is about one in 100,000 and will only get worse as the donor pool continues to shrink.

Sadly, more than 70% of patients struggle to find a stem cell match within their own families, which means many rely on strangers for a second chance at life.

If local donors are not forthcoming, we have to look overseas for potential matches, which is costly.

She said SABMR was working hard to ensure the safety of donors and patients by allowing online registration.

We also offer at-home sampling kits, which only requires a cheek swab. These kits can be delivered and collected free of charge from anywhere in the country.

Once new donors have completed the online registration form, they will be contacted by one of our consultants to discuss the easiest way of dispatching and collecting the kits.

One of the biggest misconceptions with regards to bone marrow donation, according to Chalkley, is that it involves large needles being pushed into ones spine.

However, the most common form of donation is whats called peripheral blood stem cell collection, since the same blood-forming cells found in bone marrow are also present in circulating blood.

The process is similar to donating plasma and doesnt require surgery.

In order to register as a bone marrow donor, you must be between the ages of 16 and 45 and meet the required standards listed by the SABMR.

A full list of the criteria can be found at https://sabmr.co.za/.

Each of us have a role to play. This new year, put away frivolous resolutions and rather direct your energy into making a difference by signing up as a donor. The simple act could just make someones new years wish come true, Chalkley said.

Visit the SABMR website, call 021-447-8638 or email donors@sabmr.co.za

Related

Go here to read the rest:
Covid-19 leads to shortage of bone marrow donors - GO! and Express

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

EIMEAR Gooderham (ne Smyth) was just 25 when she died peacefully in hospital with her family at her bedside.

It was just a week after she had married Phillip Gooderham in hospital and she was buried in the wedding dress she never got to wear.

Almost two years on, her family hope a television documentary about Eimear - a make-up artist from the Coolnasilla area of west Belfast - will help create a positive and lasting legacy in her memory.

The programme, due to be broadcast on UTV and presented by journalist Sarah Clarke, features Eimear's own video diaries, which she had hoped would raise awareness of a campaign for stem cell donors that she launched before her death.

Ms Clarke said the documentary had aimed to "follow Eimear's journey, treatment and her recovery".

"She was very open about her battle and while a lot of the programme is distressing, it shows how courageous Eimear was," she said.

Eimear was diagnosed with stage two Hodgkins Lymphoma, a type of blood cancer, in September 2016.

She underwent 12 cycles of intensive chemotherapy and was given the all-clear in spring 2017.

But the disease returned and in December that year, Eimear was treated with an autologous stem cell transplant, intensive chemotherapy and her own stem cells returned afterwards to rescue her bone marrow from the effect of the treatment.

Months later she was given the good news she was in remission, but the Hodgkins Lymphoma returned again and doctors said her best chance of survival was another stem cell transplant - this time from a donor.

With neither of her siblings a match, she desperately needed to find a stem cell donor.

Eimear and her father Sean launched an appeal to raise awareness of the stem cell register, which allows donors of the correct tissue types to be matched with patients.

Their campaign saw the number of people joining the register in Northern Ireland soar.

Determined to use her own experience to help others, Eimear began filming videos on her phone for the UTV documentary.

Her desire to show her cancer battle as well as her upbeat outlook on life are reflected in the diaries, with many filmed as she underwent treatment.

Speaking ahead of the broadcast tonight, Ms Clarke said her own family's cancer battle had also inspired her to tell Eimear's story.

"In 2017, my nephew Jack was diagnosed with leukaemia, aged just 15," she said.

"I remember my brother Simon, who is a doctor, saying they may have to pursue a stem cell transplant. He knew how difficult it would be to find a match and to endure.

"Fortunately Jack didn't need it, but he had to undergo a year of intensive chemo and four years of maintenance chemo.

"It was rough and a very difficult period and thankfully he's now in remission, but it made me relate to Eimear and San's appeal."

On October 31 2018 - a year before Eimear and Phillip had planned to marry - she received her stem cell transplant.

A video extract of the days after the operation shows Eimear describe how "it's been really rough", as the donor's cells began attacking her cells - a condition known as graft versus host disease.

Despite being discharged from hospital, months later she became ill again with complications associated with the transplant - she was losing her brave battle.

Phillip tells the programme: "I wanted to tell her it was going to be ok, but I didn't want to lie to her. I wanted it to be over so she wasn't in pain".

In June 2019, the couple tied the knot and Eimear got "her final wish".

"We had had it planned, we had to cancel our wedding so it was, in the most horrific circumstances, the nicest way to end her life, by her getting her final wish," said Phillip.

Eimear died on June 27 2019.

Since then her family have continued to campaign to raise awareness of stem cell donation.

Her father Sean said they hope the programme will "highlight the need for more people in Northern Ireland to join the stem cell donor register, especially young men aged between 16 and 30".

Sarah also said while the documentary is "not exactly the one we set out to make, its still one of hope and courage".

"It was Eimears dying wish to raise awareness of stem cell donation and to help further research into the treatment to help others," she said.

"She was adamant she wanted people to sign the register and raise awareness. Her family feel the onus is now on them to continue this.

"The programme pays tribute to a courageous young woman and her family's desire to create a positive and lasting legacy in her memory."

Up Close: Eimears Wish is on UTV at 10.45pm.

More:
UTV documentary tells of young Belfast woman's lasting legacy to promote stem cell donation - The Irish News

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Leukemia is the cancer of blood cells, usually white blood cells which fight and clears infections. It is also known as cancer of blood-forming tissues i.e lymphatic system and bone marrow. It is usually characterized by greatly increased numbers of abnormal white blood cells in circulating blood. It is a very serious disorder and the patient needs to change the blood regularly with normal blood from donors.

By Aysha Bibi

How does leukemia develop?

Our blood contains many different types of cells. These include red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. These cells are made on daily basis in the bone marrow. Leukemia happens when the body starts making white blood cells beyond its need. Immature white blood cells are released in the blood and these are non-functional. Moreover, as white blood cells increase in number, the number of red blood cells and platelets are not enough to maintain a healthy life and perform their normal functions.

Types of Leukemia

Leukemia has four main types

In the acute form of leukemia, cells multiply quickly in the bone marrow and enter the circulatory system too early but these cells are immature and non-functional. Chronic leukemia occurs when marrow produces mature cells and it progresses more slowly than other forms.

Lymphocytic leukemia is a type with an accumulation of apparently mature dysfunctional lymphocytes. Normally lymphocytes differentiate to form B-cells, T-cells, and natural killer cells which are the backbone of the immune system.

Myelogenous leukemia is a cancer of white blood cells usually granulocytes and monocytes. Either it is lymphocytic or myeloid, leukemia results in a compromised immune system, and the body cannot protect itself from different infections.

Acute lymphocytic leukemia(ALL) It is most common in children. It can spread to the central nervous system.

Acute myelogenous leukemia(AML) It is the second most common type of leukemia in children and also common in adults.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia It is common in adults. This remains stable for many years but in some types, patients need treatment.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia(CML) Older people may are at higher risk for this type of leukemia.

Risk Factors

Some significant risk factors that can cause leukemia

Symptoms of Leukemia

Various types of leukemia can cause different symptoms. These symptoms usually not appear in the early stages, but they may include;

Diagnosis of Leukemia

CBC: with a blood test doctor looks at several different blood cells and their maturity. Immature cells may appear in the blood.

Bone marrow biopsy is done by taking bone marrow. With help of this doctor check the type and severity of leukemia.

CT scan and MRI are also done for the diagnosis of leukemia.

Treatment of Leukemia

Depending on the type of leukemia and its spreading, a doctor may look for the following options:

In a radiation treatment, high energy X-rays are used to kill leukemic cells. But normal cells are also affected.

In chemotherapy, different drugs are given to kill leukemic cells in blood and bone marrow. This may include a pill or injection in muscle or vein.

Targeted therapy is done to block the expression of some genes or proteins that are involved in the production of cancerous cells.

A Stem cell transplant involves a bone marrow transplant from a healthy donor. In this method, high-dose chemotherapy is done to destroy the leukemic cells of a patient. The healthy stems cells of donor are then injected to body.

Splenectomy is the removal of spleen and doctor may look for this option if spleen becomes fills with cancer cell and start affecting other body organs.

Preventing or reducing the risk of leukemia

Unfortunately, there is currently no cure for leukemia. Minimum exposure to pesticides and radiations may help to reduce the risk of leukemia. Leukemia can also be prevented by avoiding tobacco.

One can lower the risk of developing leukemia by following:

It is the best way to lower the risk of leukemia.

Studies have shown that overweight and obesity are also contributing factors to increasing the risk of developing leukemia.

Pollution, gasoline, car exhaust contains low levels of benzene. It is also found in offices and homes and found in paint, glue, etc. wearing a mask while using these may help you lower the risk of exposure.

Medical radiations like x-rays increase the risk of leukemia. Try to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.

Your body and mind function at their best with a healthy diet. Proper nutrition provides energy fuel for body functioning, it also strengthens the immune system.

References:

Read the original post:
What Is Leukemia: And How To Prevent It? - Technology Times Pakistan

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Full TitleA Phase 1 Multi-Dose Study of Human Placental Hematopoeitic Stem Cell Derived Natural Killer Cells (CYNK-001) in Adults with Primary or Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Morphologic Complete Remission with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)Purpose

The purpose of this study is to find the highest dose of the investigational immunotherapy CYNK-001 that can be given safely in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is in morphologic complete remission with minimal residual disease (MRD). Morphologic complete remission occurs when white blood cell and platelet counts are within the normal range and the amount of leukemia cells is below 5 percent in a bone marrow sample. MRD means there is still a small number of leukemia cells remaining in the bloodstream.

AML with MRD is often resistant to treatment and has a high chance of coming back. CYNK-001 is a cellular therapy made of healthy donated cells called natural killer (NK) cells. The NK cells are taken from human placenta and grown in a laboratory. There are proteins in NK cells that can kill cancer cells. CYNK-001 is given intravenously (by vein).

To be eligible for this study, patients must meet several criteria, including but not limited to the following:

For more information about this study and to inquire about eligibility, please contact Dr. Aaron Goldberg at 646-608-3752.

Read the original post:
A Phase I Study of CYNK-001 Immunotherapy in Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission with Small Amounts Remaining in the Blood - On Cancer -...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy for people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone a stem cell transplant

Uxbridge, UK, 27th January 2021: Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) company, today announces that NICE has issued a Final Appraisal Document (FAD) recommending REVLIMID (lenalidomide) as maintenance treatment after an ASCT for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in adults.[iv] From today, approximately 1150 eligible patients in England will have immediate access to lenalidomide as a treatment option, with interim funding provided via the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) before transferring to baseline commissioning. Lenalidomide is the first treatment to be made available on the NHS in this setting and provides an alternative to the standard watch-and-wait approach, allowing patients to receive active treatment to keep their cancer in remission.

Graham Jackson, Professor of Clinical Haematology at Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust said: Multiple myeloma is a relapsing remitting disease where the goal of treatment is to ensure long periods of remission and a good quality of life. Maintenance therapy is integral to achieving this, particularly for newly diagnosed patients who have received a stem cell transplant. Having lenalidomide within our treatment armoury on the NHS will transform the way we manage the early stages of multiple myeloma. In clinical studies maintenance therapy has been shown to almost double the initial period of remission for this group of patients, so it is fantastic to be able to offer active treatment which can help to keep the cancer at bay.

Multiple myeloma is a cancer that affects the production of plasma cells in the bone marrow and in turn impacts the bodys immune system.[v] It is characterised by a relapsing-remitting pattern, which means that the disease goes through periods where the cancer is active and needs treatment, followed by periods where it is under control.[vi] Each time the cancer relapses, the length of time spent in remission shortens.[vii] The objective of maintenance therapy is to control the cancer during the period of remission and delay relapse of the disease.[viii]

Laura Kerby, Chief Executive of Myeloma UK said: We are delighted with this outcome. Patients who receive lenalidomide maintenance after high-dose therapy and stem cell transplant have a significant increase in overall survival, so the decision to make this available through the NHS is fantastic news.

Across the UK, around 1,500 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients undergo an ASCT each year,1,2 and most of them will eventually relapse.[ix] This first remission is a critical period for people with multiple myeloma, as it can be an indicator of the overall survival of the disease and it has been shown that effective maintenance therapy could be essential to long-term survival.[x]

Lynelle Hoch, General Manager at Bristol Myers Squibb UK & Ireland commented: Todays announcement marks an important milestone for those living with multiple myeloma, with lenalidomide being the first maintenance treatment option to be made accessible to eligible patients in England. We are grateful for the continued collaboration with NICE, healthcare professionals and Myeloma UK to ensure patients can benefit from lenalidomide in this setting.

Following the publication of this guidance, the NHS in Wales is expected to provide funding and resources for lenalidomide in this setting within two months. The treatment is already available on the NHS in Scotland and in Northern Ireland.[xi],[xii]

Go here to see the original:
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy for people with newly diagnosed multiple mye...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

As public demand grows for limited supplies of covid-19 vaccines, questions remain about the vaccines appropriateness for older adults with various illnesses. Among them are cancer patients receiving active treatment, dementia patients near the end of their lives and people with autoimmune conditions.

Recently, a number of readers have asked me whether older relatives with these conditions should be immunized. This is a matter for medical experts, and I solicited advice from several. All strongly suggested that people with questions contact their doctors and discuss their individual medical circumstances.

Experts advice may be helpful since states are beginning to offer vaccines to adults over age 65, 70 or 75, including those with serious underlying medical conditions. Twenty-eight states are doing so, according to the latest survey by The New York Times.

Q: My 80-year-old mother has chronic lymphocytic leukemia. For weeks, her oncologist would not tell her yes or no about the vaccine. After much pressure, he finally responded: It wont work for you, your immune system is too compromised to make antibodies. She asked if she can take the vaccine anyway, just in case it might offer a little protection, and he told her he was done discussing it with her.

First, some basics. Older adults, in general, responded extremely well to the two covid-19 vaccines that have received special authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. In large clinical trials sponsored by drugmakers Pfizer and Moderna, the vaccines achieved substantial protection against significant illness, with efficacy for older adults ranging from 87% to 94%.

But people 65 and older undergoing cancer treatment were not included in these studies. As a result, its not known what degree of protection they might derive.

Dr. Tobias Hohl, chief of the infectious diseases service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, suggested that three factors should influence patients decisions: Are vaccines safe, will they be effective, and what is my risk of becoming severely ill from covid-19? Regarding risk, he noted that older adults are the people most likely to become severely ill and perish from covid, accounting for about 80% of deaths to date a compelling argument for vaccination.

Regarding safety, there is no evidence at this time that cancer patients are more likely to experience side effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines than other people. Generally, we are confident that these vaccines are safe for [cancer] patients, including older patients, said Dr. Armin Shahrokni, a Memorial Sloan Kettering geriatrician and oncologist.

The exception, which applies to everyone, not just cancer patients: people who are allergic to covid-19 vaccine components or who experience severe allergic responses after getting a first shot shouldnt get covid-19 vaccines.

Efficacy is a consideration for patients whose underlying cancer or treatment suppresses their immune systems. Notably, patients with blood and lymph node cancers may experience a blunted response to vaccines, along with patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Even in this case, we have every reason to believe that if their immune system is functioning at all, they will respond to the vaccine to some extent, and thats likely to be beneficial, said Dr. William Dale, chair of supportive care medicine and director of the Center for Cancer Aging Research at City of Hope, a comprehensive cancer center in Los Angeles County.

Balancing the timing of cancer treatment and immunization may be a consideration in some cases. For those with serious disease who need therapy as quickly as possible, we should not delay [cancer] treatment because we want to preserve immune function and vaccinate them against covid, said Hohl of Memorial Sloan Kettering.

One approach might be trying to time covid vaccination in between cycles of chemotherapy, if possible, said Dr. Catherine Liu, a professor in the vaccine and infectious disease division at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

In new guidelines published late last week, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, an alliance of cancer centers, urged that patients undergoing active treatment be prioritized for vaccines as soon as possible. A notable exception: Patients whove received stem cell transplants or bone marrow transplants should wait at least three months before getting vaccines, the group recommended.

The American Cancer Societys chief medical and scientific officer, Dr. William Cance, said his organization is strongly in favor of cancer patients and cancer survivors getting vaccinated, particularly older adults. Given vaccine shortages, he also recommended that cancer patients who contract covid-19 get antibody therapies as soon as possible, if their oncologists believe theyre good candidates. These infusion therapies, from Eli Lilly and Co. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, rely on synthetic immune cells to help fight infections.

Q: Should my 97-year-old mom, in a nursing home with dementia, even get the covid vaccine?

The federal government and all 50 states recommend covid vaccines for long-term care residents, most of whom have Alzheimers disease or other types of cognitive impairment. This is an effort to stem the tide of covid-related illness and death that has swept through nursing homes and assisted living facilities 37% of all covid deaths as of mid-January.

The Alzheimers Association also strongly encourages immunization against covid-19, both for people [with dementia] living in long-term care and those living in the community, said Beth Kallmyer, vice president of care and support.

What I think this question is trying to ask is Will my loved one live long enough to see the benefit of being vaccinated? said Dr. Joshua Uy, medical director at a Philadelphia nursing home and geriatric fellowship director at the University of Pennsylvanias Perelman School of Medicine.

Potential benefits include not becoming ill or dying from covid-19, having visits from family or friends, engaging with other residents and taking part in activities, Uy suggested. (This is a partial list.) Since these benefits could start accruing a few weeks after residents in a facility are fully immunized, I would recommend the vaccine for a 97-year-old with significant dementia, Uy said.

Minimizing suffering is a key consideration, said Dr. Michael Rafii, associate professor of clinical neurology at the University of Southern Californias Keck School of Medicine. Even if a person has end-stage dementia, you want to do anything you can to reduce the risk of suffering. And this vaccine provides individuals with a good deal of protection from suffering severe covid, he said.

My advice is that everyone should get vaccinated, regardless of what stage of dementia theyre in, Rafii said. That includes dementia patients at the end of their lives in hospice care, he noted.

If possible, a loved one should be at hand for reassurance since being approached by someone wearing a mask and carrying a needle can evoke anxiety in dementia patients. Have the person administering the vaccine explain who they are, what theyre doing and why theyre wearing a mask in clear, simple language, Rafii suggested.

Q: Im 80 and I have Type 2 diabetes and an autoimmune disease. Should I get the vaccine?

There are two parts to this question. The first has to do with comorbidities having more than one medical condition. Should older adults with comorbidities get covid vaccines?

Absolutely, because theyre at higher risk of becoming seriously ill from covid, said Dr. Abinash Virk, an infectious diseases specialist and co-chair of the Mayo Clinics covid-19 vaccine rollout.

Pfizers and Modernas studies specifically looked at people who were older and had comorbidities, and they showed that vaccine response was similar to [that of] people who were younger, she noted.

The second part has to do with autoimmune illnesses such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis, which also put people at higher risk. The concern here is that a vaccine might trigger inflammatory responses that could exacerbate these conditions.

Philippa Marrack, chair of the department of immunology and genomic medicine at National Jewish Health in Denver, said theres no scientifically rigorous data on how patients with autoimmune conditions respond to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

So far, reasons for concern havent surfaced. More than 100,000 people have gotten these vaccines now, including some who probably had autoimmune disease, and theres been no systematic reporting of problems, Marrack said. If patients with autoimmune disorders are really worried, they should talk with their physicians about delaying immunization until other covid vaccines with different formulations become available, she suggested.

Last week, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society recommended that most patients with multiple sclerosis another serious autoimmune condition get the Pfizer or Moderna covid vaccines.

The vaccines are not likely to trigger an MS relapse or to worsen your chronic MS symptoms. The risk of getting COVID-19 far outweighs any risk of having an MS relapse from the vaccine, it said in a statement.

Were eager to hear from readers about questions youd like answered, problems youve been having with your care and advice you need in dealing with the health care system. Visitkhn.org/columniststo submit your requests or tips.

Judith Graham: khn.navigatingaging@gmail.com,@judith_graham

Here is the original post:
If I Have Cancer, Dementia or MS, Should I Get the Covid Vaccine? - Kaiser Health News

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

New findings of breast cancer gene mutations in women who have no family history of the disease offer a new way of estimating risk and may change the way in which these women are advised on risk management.

The findings come from two large studies, both published on January 20 in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The two articles are "extraordinary" for broadening and validating the genomic panel to help screen women at risk for breast cancer in the future, commented Eric Topol, MD, professor of molecular medicine, Scripps Research, La Jolla, California, and Medscape editor-in-chief.

"Traditionally, genetic testing of inherited breast cancer genes has focused on women at high risk who have a strong family history of breast cancer or those who were diagnosed at an early age, such as under 45 years," commented the lead investigator of one of studies, Fergus Couch, PhD, pathologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

"[Although] the risk of developing breast cancer is generally lower for women without a family history of the disease...when we looked at all women, we found that 30% of breast cancer mutations occurred in women who are not high-risk," he said.

In both studies, mutations or variants in eight genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D, ATM, and CHEK2 were found to be significantly associated with breast cancer risk.

However, the distribution of mutations among women with breast cancer differed from the distribution among unaffected women, notes Steven Narod, MD, from the Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in an accompanying editorial.

"What this means to clinicians, now that we are expanding the use of gene-panel testing to include unaffected women with a moderate risk of breast cancer in the family history, is that our time will increasingly be spent counseling women with CHEK2 and ATM mutations," he writes. Currently these two are "clumped in with 'other genes'.... [M]ost of the pretest discussion is currently focused on the implications of finding a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation."

The new findings may lead to new risk management strategies, he suggests. "Most breast cancers that occur in women with a mutation in ATM or CHEK2 are estrogen receptor positive, so these women may be candidates for anti-estrogen therapies such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, or aromatase inhibitors," he writes.

Narod observes that for now, the management of most women with either mutation will consist of screening alone, starting with MRI at age 40 years.

The medical community is not ready yet to expand genetic screening to the general population, cautions Walton Taylor, MD, past president of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS).

The ASBrS currently recommends that all patients with breast cancer as well as those at high risk for breast cancer be offered genetic testing. "All women at risk should be tested, and all patients with pathogenic variants need to be managed appropriately it saves lives," Taylor emphasized.

However, "unaffected people with no family history do not need genetic testing at this time," he told Medscape Medical News.

As to what physicians might do to better manage patients with mutations that predispose to breast cancer, Taylor said, "It's surprisingly easy."

Every genetic testing company provides genetic counselors to guide patients through next steps, Taylor pointed out, and most cancer patients have nurse navigators who make sure patients get tested and followed appropriately.

Members of the ASBrS follow the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines when they identify carriers of a pathogenic variant. Taylor says these are very useful guidelines for virtually all mutations identified thus far.

"This research is not necessarily new, but it is confirmatory for what we are doing, and that helps us make sure we are going down the right pathway," Taylor said. "It confirms that what we think is right is right and that matters," he reaffirmed.

The study led by Mayo's Couch was carried out by the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium. It involved analyzing data from 17 epidemiology studies that focused on women in the general population who develop breast cancer. For the studies, which were conducted in the United States, pathogenic variants in 28 cancer-predisposition genes were sequenced from 32,247 women with breast cancer (case patients) and 32,544 unaffected women (control persons).

In the overall CARRIERS analysis, the prevalence of pathogenic variants in 12 clinically actionable genes was 5.03% among case patients and 1.63% among control persons. The prevalence was similar in non-Hispanic White women, non-Hispanic Black women, and Hispanic case patients, as well as control persons, they add. The prevalence of pathogenic variants among Asian American case patients was lower, at only 1.64%, they note.

Among patients who had breast cancer, the most common pathogenic variants included BRCA2, which occurred in 1.29% of case patients, followed by CHEK2, at a prevalence of 1.08%, and BRCA1, at a prevalence of 0.85%.

Mutations in BRCA1 increased the risk for breast cancer more than 7.5-fold; mutations in BRCA2 increased that risk more than fivefold, the investigators state.

Mutations in PALB2 increased the risk of breast cancer approximately fourfold, they add.

Prevalence rates for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 among breast cancer patients declined rapidly after the age of 40. The decline in other variants, including ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, was limited with increasing age.

Indeed, mutations in all five of these genes were associated with a lifetime absolute risk for breast cancer greater than 20% by the age of 85 among non-Hispanic Whites.

Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 yielded a lifetime risk for breast cancer of approximately 50%. Mutations in PALB2 yielded a lifetime breast cancer risk of approximately 32%.

The risk of having a mutation in specific genes varied depending on the type of breast cancer. For example, mutations in BARD1, RAD51C, and RAD51d increased the risk for estrogen receptor (ER)negative breast cancer as well as triple-negative breast cancer, the authors note, whereas mutations in ATM, CDH1, and CHEK2 increased the risk for ER-positive breast cancer.

"These refined estimates of the prevalences of pathogenic variants among women with breast cancer in the overall population, as opposed to selected high-risk patients, may inform ongoing discussions regarding testing in patients with breast cancer," the BCAC authors observe.

"The risks of breast cancer associated with pathogenic variants in the genes evaluated in the population-based CARRIERS analysis also provide important information for risk assessment and counselling of women with breast cancer who do not meet high-risk selection criteria," they suggest.

The second study was conducted by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) under lead author Leila Dorling, PhD, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. This group sequenced 34 susceptibility genes from 60,466 women with breast cancer and 53,461 unaffected control persons.

"Protein-truncating variants in 5 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and PALB2) were associated with a significant risk of breast cancer overall (P < .0001)," the BCAC members report. "For these genes, odds ratios ranged from 2.10 to 10.57," they add.

The association between overall breast cancer risk and mutations in seven other genes was more modest, conferring approximately twice the risk for breast cancer overall, although that risk was threefold higher for the TP53 mutation.

For the 12 genes the consortium singled out as being associated with either a significant or a more modest risk for breast cancer, the effect size did not vary significantly between European and Asian women, the authors note. Again, the risk forER-positive breast cancer was over two times greater for those who had either the ATM or the CHEK2 mutation. Having mutations in BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA1, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D conferred a higher risk for ER-negative disease than for ER-positive disease.

There was also an association between rare missense variants in six genes CHEK2, ATM, TP53, BRCA1, CDH1, and RECQL and overall breast cancer risk, with the clearest evidence being for CHEK2.

"The absolute risk estimates place protein-truncating variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in the high-risk category and place protein-truncating variants in ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, RAD51CC, and RAD51D in the moderate-risk category," Dorling and colleagues reaffirm.

"These results may guide screening as well as prevention with risk-reducing surgery or medication, in accordance with national guidelines," the authors suggest.

The CARRIERS study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. The study by Dorling and colleagues was supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programs, among others. Narod has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

New Eng J Med. Published online January 20, 2021. Couch et al, Abstract; BCAC study, Full text; Editorial

For more from Medscape Oncology, join us on Twitter and Facebook.

See more here:
Breast Cancer Gene Mutations Found in 30% of All Women - Medscape

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

GeneDx launched new tests, including repeat expansion analysis for SCA, Friedreich ataxia, and other common ataxias.

Most types of adult onset hereditary ataxia are caused by nucleotide repeat expansions within the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and are usually identified by specialized testing. The remaining types of hereditary ataxia may be caused by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) that can be identified by sequencing and deletion/duplication testing.

"Individuals with ataxia need more diagnostic testing options for genetic forms of the disease," saidAmanda Lindy, Ph.D., FACMG, Director of Neurogenetics for GeneDx. "Historically, genetic testing for ataxia has been limited, creating a barrier for some individuals to obtain testing. GeneDx's expanded test offerings provide the flexibility of ordering single or multi-gene repeat expansion analyses, concurrently or reflexively, with a phenotypically driven Xpanded panel or an exome. Thus covering the broadest possible differential, delivering more answers to patients and their families, and enabling precision medical management."

"GeneDx has a deep clinical knowledge of the ataxias and related movement disorders, gained from our long history and industry-leading development of neurogenetic testing," saidSean Hofherr, Ph.D., FACMG, Executive Vice President and CLIA Laboratory Director of GeneDx. "Expanding our menu to include adult-onset ataxias, in addition to the existing portfolio for childhood-onset ataxias, underscores GeneDx's commitment to rare disease identification as well as filling an unmet need for patients and providers, alike."

About GeneDx, Inc.GeneDx, Inc. is a global leader in genomics, providing testing to patients and their families from more than 55 countries. Led by its world-renowned clinical genomics program, GeneDx has an acknowledged expertise in rare and ultra-rare genetic disorders, as well as one of the broadest menus of sequencing services available among commercial laboratories. GeneDx offers a suite of additional genetic testing services, including diagnostic testing for hereditary cancers, cardiac, mitochondrial, neurological disorders, prenatal diagnostics and targeted variant testing. GeneDx is a subsidiary of BioReference Laboratories, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of OPKO Health, Inc. To learn more, please visitwww.genedx.com.

About OPKO HealthOPKO is a multinational biopharmaceutical and diagnostics company that seeks to establish industry-leading positions in large, rapidly growing markets by leveraging its discovery, development, and commercialization expertise and novel and proprietary technologies. For more information, visitwww.opko.com.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA), which statements may be identified by words such as "expects," "plans," "projects," "will," "may," "anticipates," "believes," "should," "intends," "estimates," and other words of similar meaning, including statements regarding GeneDx's test offerings and the effectiveness and utility of its ataxias tests, as well as other non-historical statements about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding our business, technologies and products, financial condition, strategies or prospects. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those described in the OPKO Health, Inc. Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed and to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, forward-looking statements may also be adversely affected by equipment and reagent shortages, general market factors, competitive product development, product availability, federal and state regulations and legislation, the regulatory process for new products and indications, manufacturing issues that may arise, patent positions and litigation, among other factors. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release speak only as of the date the statements were made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements. We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the PSLRA.

References:

SOURCE GeneDx, Inc.

http://www.genedx.com

More:
OPKO Health's GeneDx Adds Repeat Expansion Analysis Genetic Tests for Diagnosis of Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA), Friedreich Ataxia, and Other Common...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Connecticut has at least eight cases of the more highly contagious strain of the coronavirus, and stateofficials say there are likely more.

But identifying who is infected with the so-called U.K. variant involves sophisticated genetic testing that is both time-consuming and expensive.

Only a handful of labs in Connecticut currently have the ability to screen for the U.K. or other variants, let alone do the genetic testing,said Dr. Jafar Razeq, head of Connecticuts state laboratory.

The U.S. as a whole is lagging behind in these surveillanceefforts, which public health experts say are key to identifying mutations of the virus that could be more highly transmissible, make people more sick or evade vaccines. Experts expect the U.K. variant to bepredominant in the U.S. in March.

The yes/no answer for infection was great throughout 2020. We now need to be able to ask these more sophisticated questions about what exactly is circulating in the state, said Mark Adams,professor and deputy directorat The Jackson Laboratory in Farmington.

Late last year, when newsbegan circulating that a more highly contagious strain ofthevirus was spreading in the U.K, Jackson Lab became one of the only places in Connecticut to start screening positive COVID-19 samples for the U.K. variant.

The labis responsiblefor about 20% to 25% of all COVID-19 tests administered in the state, and is one of few labs that have thetestscapable of screening for the U.K. variant, a process that involves looking for mutations in the virus's genome. Once it identifies those mutations indicating the potential for theU.K. variant, the lab then does genetic testing on the samples to confirm.

The lab has performed genetic testing on 21 positive samples so far,and confirmed only three of them were the U.K. variant, "so it's still quite rare in the state," Adams said. Another batch of samples is being tested, he said.

The lab is in the process of developing a system to more quickly detect if someone hasthe U.K. variant or other mutations of the virus,and that would enable the analysis tobe donefasterand ona wider scale, Adams said.

Razeq said the state lab over the past several weeks has received a portion of the positive samples from other labs in the state that don't have the capability to screen for the U.K. variant. Any samples that meet the"candidacy criteria" are sent toJacksonLab or Yale for genetic testing.

"It's impossible to test every single positive case, so we are trying to test a representative sample coming from different geographical locations around the state," Razeq said.

A portion of the positive samples are being sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be analyzed.

Regardlessof whethersomeone has a more contagious strain of the virus, the public healthmessaging is the same, Adams and Razeq said: keep wearing masks, social distancing and washing hands.

"The same mechanisms worked with previous variants and they should work with the current and any new variants," Razeq said."There's no magic solution until we have everybody vaccinated and the vaccine works and we are good to go."

j.bergman@theday.com

Read the original here:
Connecticut has eight cases of U.K. coronavirus variant. Finding others involves sophisticated genetic testing. - theday.com

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

The recently published report called Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market 2020 2027 is a fundamental study carried out by the experts with a perspective of the global market. It gets to the details of competing structure of industries worldwide. The report investigates the limits and strong points of the players. The report focuses on analyzing this market on the basis of various market uprights and presents a clear picture of it. This Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market report aimed to stick to sources whose reputation rests on their objectivity, rather than on excited statements of companies whose incentive is to see the future their way.

The worldwide Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices industry 2020 research report has described Forecasted Compound Annual growth Rate (CAGR) in terms of % value for specified period, it will clearly help user to take their decision depending on the futuristic chart including key players in worldwide Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market. The report profiles some of the key players in the global Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market and provides insightful information about Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices industry, such as business overview, Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market product segmentation, revenue segmentation, and latest developments.

Get Sample Report Here@ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-sample/1046

The global Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices industrys rivalry structure is also analyzed in the report in which a competitors core values, niche markets, missions, objectives, strengths, and weaknesses are heavily emphasized. It explains the association between global Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market and its peers and parent markets. Additionally, the proposed competitive analysis aids a market player to comprehend the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market at a minute level and gain competitive advantages.

Besides, the report examines and provides a detailed delineation of industry environment which explores influential factors such as social, political, economic, and atmospheric conditions as well as provincial trade frameworks, market entry barriers, and other hindering factors that may impact the global Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market growth and causes profit declines. Eventually, the report offers valuable research conclusions that help players make informed business decisions and stay ahead of the curve.

The research report presents a comprehensive evaluation of the market and contains thoughtful insights, historical data, facts, and statistically supported and industry-validated market data. It also includes predictions using a proper set of assumptions and methodologies. The research report provides analysis and information according to market segments such as application, geographies, and industry.

Major Players In The Industry Are: Pathway Genomics, Color Genomics, Counsyl, Inc., deCode genetics, Inc., Map My Gene, and GenePartner.

While performing in a specific industry it is highly essential to determine forthcoming possibilities, therefore the global Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market report covers all-inclusive evaluation based on upcoming business and investment opportunities, market restraining factors, business threats, challenges, regulatory alliance as well as industry environment. With the help of proposed valuable insight readers could achieve its predetermined business goals.

LIMITED TIME OFFER Hurry Up!

Apply Promo Code CMIFIRST1000 And Get Instant Discount Of USD 1000

Buy This Research Report Here: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/buy-now/1046

Featured Attribute in the Report

Major Points from Table of Contents:

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market Research Report 2020-2027, by Manufacturers, Regions, Types and Applications

1 Introduction

1.1 Objective of the Study 1.2 Definition of the Market 1.3 Market Scope 1.3.1 Market Segment by Type, Application and Marketing Channel 1.3.2 Major Regions Covered (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Mid East and Africa) 1.4 Years Considered for the Study (2016-2027) 1.5 Currency Considered (U.S. Dollar) 1.6 Stakeholders

2 Key Findings of the Study

3 Market Dynamics

3.1 Driving Factors for this Market 3.2 Factors Challenging the Market 3.3 Opportunities of the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market (Regions, Growing/Emerging Downstream Market Analysis) 3.4 Technological and Market Developments in the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market 3.5 Industry News by Region 3.6 Regulatory Scenario by Region/Country 3.7 Market Investment Scenario Strategic Recommendations Analysis

4 Value Chain of the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market

4.1 Value Chain Status 4.2 Upstream Raw Material Analysis 4.3 Midstream Major Company Analysis (by Manufacturing Base, by Product Type) 4.4 Distributors/Traders 4.5 Downstream Major Customer Analysis (by Region)

5 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market-Segmentation by Type

6 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market-Segmentation by Application

7 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market-Segmentation by Marketing Channel 7.1 Traditional Marketing Channel (Offline) 7.2 Online Channel

8 Competitive Intelligence Company Profiles

9 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market-Segmentation by Geography

9.1 North America 9.2 Europe 9.3 Asia-Pacific 9.4 Latin America

9.5 Middle East and Africa

10 Future Forecast of the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market from 2020-2027

10.1 Future Forecast of the Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market from 2020-2027 Segment by Region 10.2 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Production and Growth Rate Forecast by Type (2020-2027) 10.3 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Consumption and Growth Rate Forecast by Application (2020-2027)

11 Appendix

11.1 Methodology 12.2 Research Data Source

Continued.

About Coherent Market Insights

Coherent Market Insights is a prominent market research and consulting firm offering action-ready syndicated research reports, custom market analysis, consulting services, and competitive analysis through various recommendations related to emerging market trends, technologies, and potential absolute dollar opportunity.

Contact Us

Mr. Shah

Coherent Market Insights

1001 4th Ave,

#3200 Seattle, WA 98154

Phone: US +12067016702 / UK +4402081334027

Email: sales@coherentmarketinsights.com

See the original post:
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Devices Market by 2027 Report: Opportunities, Vendors, Shares, Industry Growth, and Forecast KSU | The Sentinel...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

The Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Market report upholds the future market predictions related to Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics market size, revenue, production, Consumption, gross margin and other substantial factors. It also examines the role of the prominent Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics market players involved in the industry including their corporate overview. While emphasizing the key driving factors for Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics market, the report also offers a full study of the future trends and developments of the market.

Request Sample https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/request-sample.php?id=23517

Our industry professionals are working relentlessly to understand, assemble and timely deliver assessment on impact of COVID-19 disaster on many corporations and their clients to help them in taking excellent business decisions.

The key insights of the report:

For competitor segment, the report includes global key players of Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics as well as some small players.

The information for each competitor includes:

For product type segment, this report listed main product type of Predictive Genetic Testing And Consumer/Wellness Genomics market

For end use/application segment, this report focuses on the status and outlook for key applications. End users are also listed.

For geography segment, regional supply, application-wise and type-wise demand, major players, price is presented from 2020 to 2028. This report covers following regions:

The key countries in each region are taken into consideration as well, such as United States, China, Japan, India, Korea, ASEAN, Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, CIS, and Brazil etc.

Ask for Discount https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/ask-for-discount.php?id=23517

The key questions answered in this report:

Various factors are responsible for the markets growth trajectory, which are studied at length in the report. In addition, the report lists down the restraints that are posing threat to the global Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics market. It also gauges the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat from new entrants and product substitute, and the degree of competition prevailing in the market. The influence of the latest government guidelines is also analyzed in detail in the report. It studies the Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics markets trajectory between forecast periods.

Reasons Why You Should Buy This Report

This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics

Enquiry Before Buying https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/enquiry-before-buying.php?id=23517

Customization of the Report

Market Research Inc provides customization of reports as per your need. This report can be personalized to meet your requirements. Get in touch with our sales team, who will guarantee you to get a report that suits your necessities.

Table of Contents:

Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Overview

Impact on Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Industry

Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Competition

Servo Motors and Drives, Revenue by Region

Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Supply, Consumption, Export and Import by Region

Servo Motors and Drives, Revenue, Price Trend by Type

Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Analysis by Application

Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Cost Analysis

Internal Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Market Effect Factors Analysis

Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Market Forecast (2020-2028)

Appendix

About Us: Research Corporation Reports is a piece of Absolute Markets Insights and offers premium dynamic measurable looking over, statistical surveying reports, examination and estimate information for businesses and governments around the world. Research Corporation Reports includes a thorough rundown of statistical surveying reports from many distributors around the world. We brag a database traversing basically every market class and a considerably progressively complete gathering of statistical surveying reports under these classifications and sub-classifications.

Contact Us: The Research CorporationWilliam K (Sales Manager)1632 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10028, USA+1 929 299 7373sales@theresearchcorporation.com

Read the original post:
Predictive Genetic Testing and Consumer/Wellness Genomics Market Size study, by Product Type, By Application, and Regional Forecasts 2020-2028 and Key...

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Global Prenatal and Newborn Genetic Testing Market trends analysis report 2021, the future of the industries is predicted on the basis of the current scenario, income, and growth opportunities. An assortment of graphical introduction systems is utilized to demonstrate the actual facts. In the end, we examine some variables that provide drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges for the Prenatal and Newborn Genetic Testing Market.

This report provides a mixture of qualitative and quantitative information including Geographical Growth, Trends, Market Share, Size, Applications, Types, Key Players, Production, Competition by Revenue, Cost Analysis, and Goal Value by important segments.

Request for Sample copy:

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/01272569770/global-prenatal-and-newborn-genetic-testing-market-size-status-and-forecast-2021-2027/inquiry?mode=112.

Key Market Players: Roche Diagnostic, Elitech Group, Myriad Genetics, Biocartis, IntegraGen, Perkin Elmer, WaferGen Biosystem, Interpace Diagnostics, Quest Diagnostic, Bio-Rad, AutoGenomics, Abbott, Cepheid, EKF Diagnostics, Natera, Agilent Technologies, Illumina, Ariosa Diagnostics, Sequenom

The information for each competitor includes:

Company Profile, SWOT Analysis, Regional Sales Analysis, Revenue Share, Price, Gross Margin

And Production Rate

Market segment by Type, the product can be split intoHospitals

Diagnostic Organization

OtherMarket segment by Application, split intoArray-Comparative Genetic Hybridization (aCGH)

Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH)

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The report has 150 tables and figures browse the report description and TOC:

https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/reports/01272569770/global-prenatal-and-newborn-genetic-testing-market-size-status-and-forecast-2021-2027?mode=112.

The key questions answered in this report:

Reasons to buy this Prenatal and Newborn Genetic Testing Market Report:

Regional Analysis

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), and market share and growth rate ofPrenatal and Newborn Genetic Testing Marketthese regions, from 2021 to 2027 (forecast), covering

North America,Europe,China,Japan, Southeast Asia, India, North America (USA, Canada, and Mexico)Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia, and Italy)Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, and Southeast

About Us:

MarketInsightsReports provides syndicated market research on industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. MarketInsightsReports provides global and regional market intelligence coverage, a holistic market view which includes statistical forecasts, competitive landscape, detailed segmentation, key trends, and strategic recommendations.

Contact Us:

Irfan Tamboli (Head of Sales) Market Insights Reports

Phone: + 1704 266 3234 | +91-750-707-8687

sales@marketinsightsreports.com | irfan@marketinsightsreports.com

Here is the original post:
Prenatal and Newborn Genetic Testing Market Report Region wise share, business scope, and demand analysis - The Courier

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, discusses genetic testing and emerging precision medicine strategies in the field of colorectal cancer.

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, consultant, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, discusses genetic testing and emerging precision medicine strategies in the field of colorectal cancer (CRC).

As part of the Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) research consortium, multiple clinical trials are using genetic information obtained from roughly 6,000 patients with CRC across 16 centers. The study known as COLOMATE utilizes both liquid and tissue biopsy to identify genetic alterations in patients with CRC, say Bekaii-Saab. Other research includes the PULSE study (NCT03992456) of panitumumab (Vectibix), regorafenib (Stivarga), or TAS-102 (Lonsurf) as treatment of patients with metastatic and/or unresectable RAS wild-type disease. Finally, the MOUNTAINEER study (NCT03043313) of tucatinib trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive disease is also underway as part of ACCRU. Presentations on these studies occurred during the 2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

Outside of these studies, Bekaii-Saab says there are basket trials that coverEGFR-mutated CRC,MET-mutated disease, as well asKRASG12C-mutated disease. The hope is that the landscape continues to expand and CRC will become classified as multiple diseases based on the genetic alterations found in patients.

Read more from the original source:
Genomics May Reclassify Disease in Patients With Colorectal Cancer - Targeted Oncology

Recommendation and review posted by Bethany Smith